The University of Texas at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
NCT Number: NCT05368350
The purpose of the study is to test whether low level electric stimulation, called transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), on the part of the brain (i.e., pre-supplementary motor area and left inferior frontal gyrus) thought to aid in memory will improve speech and language difficulties in patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS). The primary outcome measures are neuropsychological assessments of speech and language functions, and the secondary measures are neuropsychological assessments of other cognitive abilities and electroencephalography (EEG) measures.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
This pilot study has one treatment arm with open-label treatment and will examine improvement of speech output, verbal fluency, and other cognitive deficits associated with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS), by utilizing 1 milliamp transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) active treatment applied to pre-supplementary motor area or left inferior frontal gyrus for 20 minutes over 10 sessions. There will be baseline testing, and follow up testing immediately after and 8 weeks after completion of treatment.
All patients with a clinical diagnosis of PPA or PAOS will be assigned to either one of the two open-label arms to receive active tDCS. Primary outcome speech and language measures, secondary neuropsychological and electroencephalography (EEG) measures, and pre-screening assessments for study medical history and contraindications for treatment will be collected prior to the treatment (i.e., baseline).
Primary outcome speech and language functions measures and secondary neuropsychological and electroencephalography (EEG) measures will be collected after treatment session 10 and following treatment competition (i.e., 8-week).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other Names:
tDCS
1 milliamp tDCS High definition tDCS High definition transcranial direct current stimulator, Neuroelectrics Starstim tES, SN E20200930-10 Transcranial direct current stimulation will be delivered via a Neuroelectrics Starstim tES. Stimulation will consist of 1 milliamp stimulation, with (1) Pre-SMA stimulation arm -- anodal stimulation delivered at electrode Fz (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes F7, FP1, FP2, and F8 as returns or (2) LIFG stimulation arm -- at electrode F7 (International 10/10 System for electroencephalography electrode placement) and electrodes T7, FP1, AF3, and FC5 as returns. All electrodes are 1 cm diameter Ag/AgCl electrodes and make contact with the scalp via connective gel. Stimulation will linearly ramp up from 0 milliamps to 1 milliamp over 60 seconds, then remain at 1 milliamp of stimulation over 20 minutes, and finally ramping down at to 0 milliamps over 60 seconds.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on the Control Word Association Test
Benton, L.A., Hamsher, K., & Sivan, A.B., (1994). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: AJA Associates.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on Category Fluency
Benton, L.A., Hamsher, K., & Sivan, A.B., (1994). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: AJA Associates.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Boston Naming Test (accuracy and speech latency)
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S., (1983). Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.). Lea & Febiger: Philadelphia.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on Spontaneous speech (content and fluency) of the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised
Kertesz, Andrew. ( 1982). The Western aphasia battery. New York :Grune & Stratton.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on characteristics of articulation of the the Apraxia battery for Adults - 2
Dabul, B. L. (2000). Apraxia Battery for Adults (ABA-2) (2nd edn). Austin, TX: ProEd.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Trail Making Test (Part A & B)
Reitan, R.M., (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept. Motor Skill., 8, 271-276.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Digit Span Forward & Backward
Wechsler, D., (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Digit Symbol Substitution Test
Wechsler, D., (2008). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised
Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., & Brandt, J. (1998). The Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: Normative data and analysis of interform and test-retest reliability. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 43-55.
Time frame: Treatment change from Baseline to Immediate post, and 8 weeks post treatment completion.
Evaluation of treatment differences in change on The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test
Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encéphalopathie traumatique. (Les problems.). [The psychological examination in cases of traumatic encepholopathy. Problems.]. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 215- 285.
The University of Texas at Dallas
Other
Treating Primary Progressive Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech With High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HDtDCS-PPA/PAOS)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03313011
Aphasia, Aphasia, Broca
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01818661
Aphasia, Aphasia, Broca
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01623284
Aphasia, Aphasia, Broca
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05741853
Alzheimer Disease, Aphasia
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial Details