TMH Intervention
BehavioralHome visits and close interaction with injured patient to assure plan for care is being followed.
NCT Number: NCT03108820
This proposal aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 6-month collaborative care intervention in improving the functional and psychological recovery of 430 injury survivors 50 and older. The trial has the following specific aims: 1) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to improve the physical recovery of older injury survivors; and 2) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to improve the psychological recovery of older injury survivors; and 3) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to reduce healthcare costs of older injury survivors and evaluate the cost of effectiveness of the TMH intervention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Eskenazi Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Despite the potential for full recovery surprisingly few older injury survivors are able to realize maximal recovery of function and quality of life after injury due to fragmentation of care delivery and lack of focus on psychological symptoms in the early post-injury period. Older injured adults are at particular risk of death and disability after injury. Thus, a fundamental gap in knowledge exists regarding the best way to enhance the recovery of injury survivors. The continued existence of this gap is an important problem because unless it is filled, injury survivors will continue to suffer from potentially reversible impairments of health and well-being. The long-term goal of this line of research is to improve the health and quality of care for injured patients. Indiana University School of Medicine researchers have over 20 years of experience developing innovative and effective collaborative care models that integrate with primary care and specialty physicians to address the complex biopsychosocial needs of patients with chronic disease states, such as dementia and depression. Based on these successes, an interdisciplinary team of clinical investigators at Indiana University revised the collaborative care model to meet the needs of injury survivors who are in an active recovery state. This injury specific collaborative care model is called the Trauma Medical Home (TMH). This proposal aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 6-month collaborative care intervention in improving the functional and psychological recovery of 430 injury survivors 50 and older. The trial has the following specific aims: 1) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to improve the physical recovery of older injury survivors; and 2) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to improve the psychological recovery of older injury survivors; and 3) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to reduce healthcare costs of older injury survivors and evaluate the cost of effectiveness of the TMH intervention. The research proposed in this application is innovative, in our opinion, because it represents a new and substantive departure from the status quo. Previous collaborative care models focused on chronic care management and they lack rapid adaptability. Because the recovery trajectory of injured patients is dynamic and changes quickly, the innovations in this proposal have to do with providing real-time feedback to a care coordinator that will allow the care coordinator to adjust an injury specific collaborative care protocol to meet the needs of the injured as they move through the dynamic recovery period after injury. This contribution will be significant as broad application of the Trauma Medical Home in trauma centers and trauma systems nationwide could result in better health and improved quality of post-injury care for older injured patients. Improved physical health and fewer psychological symptoms, will likely result in better overall functional ability, the increased ability to return to work and less reliance on family, social, and health care resources.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Home visits and close interaction with injured patient to assure plan for care is being followed.
Review hospital discharge and rehabilitation plan, identification of primary care provider, provision of educational materials on communication skills, caregiver coping skills, and legal and financial advice.
Time frame: 12 months
As determined using the Physical Component Score of Short form (SF) SF-36. Score range: 0-100, higher scores indicate a better health state. The change is between baseline and 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
As determined using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). SPPB total score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 points (best performance). The change was determined between baseline and 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
As determined using the Mental Component Score of SF-36. Score range: 0-100, higher scores indicate a better health state. The change was determined between baseline and 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
As determined by hospital readmission
Time frame: 6 months
As determined using the Physical Component Score of Short form (SF) SF-36. Score range: 0-100, higher scores indicate a better health state. The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
As determined using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). SPPB total score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 points (best performance). The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
As determined using the Mental Component Score of SF-36. Score range: 0-100, higher scores indicate a better health state. The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.
Time frame: 12 months
As determined using the (Patient Health Questionnaire) PHQ-9. The scale is from 1 - 27 with higher scores related to worse depression severity. The change was determined between baseline and 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
As determined using the (Generalized Anxiety Disorder) GAD-7. Scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. The change was determined between baseline and 12 months.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
As determined using the cost-effectiveness ratio
Time frame: 6 months
As determined using the (Patient Health Questionnaire) PHQ-9. The scale is from 1 - 27 with higher scores related to worse depression severity. The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
As determined using the (Generalized Anxiety Disorder) GAD-7. Scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.
Indiana University
Other
Collaborative Care for the Older Injured Patient: A Trauma Medical Home
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06715618
Injuries, Prevention
Saint-Sébastien-de-Morsent, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06092866
Digestive System Diseases, Gastro-Intestinal Disorder
Malmö, Region Skane, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07031869
Arm Injuries, Athletes
Falun, Dalarna County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07115160
Grip Strength, Injuries
Leksand, Region Dalarna, Sweden
View Trial Details