Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03108820

Trauma Medical Home for Older Injured Patients

This proposal aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 6-month collaborative care intervention in improving the functional and psychological recovery of 430 injury survivors 50 and older. The trial has the following specific aims: 1) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to improve the physical recovery of older injury survivors; and 2) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to improve the psychological recovery of older injury survivors; and 3) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to reduce healthcare costs of older injury survivors and evaluate the cost of effectiveness of the TMH intervention.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Eskenazi Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Despite the potential for full recovery surprisingly few older injury survivors are able to realize maximal recovery of function and quality of life after injury due to fragmentation of care delivery and lack of focus on psychological symptoms in the early post-injury period. Older injured adults are at particular risk of death and disability after injury. Thus, a fundamental gap in knowledge exists regarding the best way to enhance the recovery of injury survivors. The continued existence of this gap is an important problem because unless it is filled, injury survivors will continue to suffer from potentially reversible impairments of health and well-being. The long-term goal of this line of research is to improve the health and quality of care for injured patients. Indiana University School of Medicine researchers have over 20 years of experience developing innovative and effective collaborative care models that integrate with primary care and specialty physicians to address the complex biopsychosocial needs of patients with chronic disease states, such as dementia and depression. Based on these successes, an interdisciplinary team of clinical investigators at Indiana University revised the collaborative care model to meet the needs of injury survivors who are in an active recovery state. This injury specific collaborative care model is called the Trauma Medical Home (TMH). This proposal aims to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 6-month collaborative care intervention in improving the functional and psychological recovery of 430 injury survivors 50 and older. The trial has the following specific aims: 1) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to improve the physical recovery of older injury survivors; and 2) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to improve the psychological recovery of older injury survivors; and 3) Evaluate the ability of the TMH intervention to reduce healthcare costs of older injury survivors and evaluate the cost of effectiveness of the TMH intervention. The research proposed in this application is innovative, in our opinion, because it represents a new and substantive departure from the status quo. Previous collaborative care models focused on chronic care management and they lack rapid adaptability. Because the recovery trajectory of injured patients is dynamic and changes quickly, the innovations in this proposal have to do with providing real-time feedback to a care coordinator that will allow the care coordinator to adjust an injury specific collaborative care protocol to meet the needs of the injured as they move through the dynamic recovery period after injury. This contribution will be significant as broad application of the Trauma Medical Home in trauma centers and trauma systems nationwide could result in better health and improved quality of post-injury care for older injured patients. Improved physical health and fewer psychological symptoms, will likely result in better overall functional ability, the increased ability to return to work and less reliance on family, social, and health care resources.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • English-speaking adult age 50 years and older;
  • admitted to Indiana University Health - Methodist or Eskenazi Health hospitals;
  • able to provide consent or has a legally authorized representative to provide consent;
  • access to a telephone;
  • and an injury severity score (ISS) of 9 or greater.

Exclusion criteria

  • have a self-reported diagnosis of cancer with short life expectancy;
  • have a history of dementing illnesses and other neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, or vascular dementia;
  • have a significant traumatic brain injury (defined as the presence of any intracranial blood on Computed Tomography scan of the head or best Glasgow Coma Scale Score of less than 13 at the time of study enrollment);
  • have any spinal cord injury with persistent neurologic deficit at the time of study enrollment;
  • are pregnant women (assessed by a urine pregnancy test);
  • have a primary residence outside the state of Indiana;
  • are incarcerated at the time of study enrollment;
  • have an acute stroke upon admission or develop a stroke as a new event during the course of hospitalization;
  • unable to complete study questionnaire due to severe hearing loss;
  • recent history of alcohol or substance abuse;
  • discharged to a permanent care facility;
  • admitted with a burn affecting >10% total body surface area.

Treatment and study plan

TMH Intervention

Behavioral

Home visits and close interaction with injured patient to assure plan for care is being followed.

Usual Care

Other

Review hospital discharge and rehabilitation plan, identification of primary care provider, provision of educational materials on communication skills, caregiver coping skills, and legal and financial advice.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Self Reported Physical Recovery

    Time frame: 12 months

    As determined using the Physical Component Score of Short form (SF) SF-36. Score range: 0-100, higher scores indicate a better health state. The change is between baseline and 12 months.

  2. Change in Physical Recovery

    Time frame: 12 months

    As determined using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). SPPB total score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 points (best performance). The change was determined between baseline and 12 months.

  3. Change in Self Reported Psychological Recovery

    Time frame: 12 months

    As determined using the Mental Component Score of SF-36. Score range: 0-100, higher scores indicate a better health state. The change was determined between baseline and 12 months.

  4. Healthcare Utilization

    Time frame: 12 months

    As determined by hospital readmission

  5. Change in Self Reported Physical Recovery

    Time frame: 6 months

    As determined using the Physical Component Score of Short form (SF) SF-36. Score range: 0-100, higher scores indicate a better health state. The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.

  6. Change in Physical Recovery

    Time frame: 6 months

    As determined using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). SPPB total score ranges from 0 (worst performance) to 12 points (best performance). The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.

  7. Change in Self Reported Psychological Recovery

    Time frame: 6 months

    As determined using the Mental Component Score of SF-36. Score range: 0-100, higher scores indicate a better health state. The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Depression Symptoms

    Time frame: 12 months

    As determined using the (Patient Health Questionnaire) PHQ-9. The scale is from 1 - 27 with higher scores related to worse depression severity. The change was determined between baseline and 12 months.

  2. Change in Anxiety Symptoms

    Time frame: 12 months

    As determined using the (Generalized Anxiety Disorder) GAD-7. Scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. The change was determined between baseline and 12 months.

  3. Cost Effectiveness

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    As determined using the cost-effectiveness ratio

  4. Change in Depression Symptoms

    Time frame: 6 months

    As determined using the (Patient Health Questionnaire) PHQ-9. The scale is from 1 - 27 with higher scores related to worse depression severity. The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.

  5. Change in Anxiety Symptoms

    Time frame: 6 months

    As determined using the (Generalized Anxiety Disorder) GAD-7. Scores range from 0-21, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms. The change was determined between baseline and 6 months.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Indiana University

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Missouri, Kansas City

Registry information

Official study title

Collaborative Care for the Older Injured Patient: A Trauma Medical Home

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Apr 11, 2017
Registry last updated
Jun 24, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.