Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06177418

Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy (TULA) is increasingly favored in the treatment of appendicitis within the realm of minimally invasive surgical approaches. This procedure offers advantages such as superior cosmetic outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. However, like all surgical interventions, it carries the inherent risk of surgical site infections (SSI), which pose significant challenges to patient health and healthcare systems by escalating treatment costs, prolonging recovery, and increasing morbidity rates. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the "glove finger method" in mitigating SSI risk in TULA.

The rationale for this study is predicated on the hypothesis that the glove finger method could serve as a simple and cost-effective measure offering potential protection against SSIs. When compared to traditional methods, this technique may not only reduce surgical duration but also diminish the risk of SSIs, thereby potentially decreasing hospital stay durations. Furthermore, enhancing the understanding of factors contributing to the development of SSIs and developing effective strategies for their prevention can elevate patient care quality and alleviate the burden on healthcare systems.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

5 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mustafa Azizoğlu

Istanbul, 34430, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Mustafa Azizoğlu

CONTACT

[email protected]

+905447448244

About this study

Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy (TULA) is increasingly favored in the treatment of appendicitis within the realm of minimally invasive surgical approaches. This procedure offers advantages such as superior cosmetic outcomes and reduced postoperative pain. However, like all surgical interventions, it carries the inherent risk of surgical site infections (SSI), which pose significant challenges to patient health and healthcare systems by escalating treatment costs, prolonging recovery, and increasing morbidity rates. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of the "glove finger method" in mitigating SSI risk in TULA.

The rationale for this study is predicated on the hypothesis that the glove finger method could serve as a simple and cost-effective measure offering potential protection against SSIs. When compared to traditional methods, this technique may not only reduce surgical duration but also diminish the risk of SSIs, thereby potentially decreasing hospital stay durations. Furthermore, enhancing the understanding of factors contributing to the development of SSIs and developing effective strategies for their prevention can elevate patient care quality and alleviate the burden on healthcare systems.

This study will compare transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy (TULA) methods applied to pediatric patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis at our clinic. Employing a randomized controlled design, the study aims to assess the efficacy and safety differences between two distinct surgical techniques currently in practice.

The study will adopt a randomized, controlled, and prospective design. Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups based on the treatment methods:

Group 1: Standard TULA Group: In this group, patients will undergo the standard TULA procedure through a 15 mm trocar port in the umbilical region. The procedure will involve locating the appendix and removing it via an extracorporeal approach.

Group 2: TULA + Glove Finger Technique Group: In addition to the standard TULA procedure, patients in this group will receive the glove finger technique, aimed at preventing contamination of surrounding tissues by infected tissue.

The research will examine parameters such as age, gender, duration of symptoms, laboratory and radiological findings, applied treatment methods, surgical techniques, complications, operation time, and the frequency of postoperative wound infections in both groups. This study intends to shed light on the clinical outcomes of various TULA methodologies.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

patients undergo appendectomy between 5 and 18 years.

Exclusion criteria

Comorbidity previous surgery

Treatment and study plan

Transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy + Glove finger technique

Procedure

Ssince the appendix becomes infected when it is removed from the umbilicus, the infected appendix contacts the edge of the incision during release, thus contaminating the incision and causing postoperative wound infection. Additionally, in the experimental, to prevent this wound infection, after the appendix is taken out through the umbilical incision, the appendix is placed inside the glove finger, thus preventing the appendix from touching the wound during its release. This reduces wound infection in the postoperative period.

Standard transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy

Procedure

Standart transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy

Primary outcomes

  1. Operative time

    Time frame: intraopertaive period

    operative time

  2. Postoperative wound infection

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Postoperative wound infection

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Necmi Kadıoğlu Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Glove Finger Method to Prevent Wound Infection in Children Undergoing Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Dec 20, 2023
Registry last updated
Aug 20, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.