University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
NCT Number: NCT01209260
This is a randomized controlled trial examining whether a mechanical needle versus a needle that uses radiofrequency energy is better at puncturing through a thin wall in the heart (called "transseptal puncture") as measured by procedure time, during an electrical procedure/study of the heart .
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Transseptal puncture is a commonly performed procedure allowing access to the left atrium for catheter ablation. Historically, a conventional Brockenbrough needle has been used for this procedure to mechanically puncture the fossa ovalis, which has been well described in the literature.1, 2 Although generally safe, serious complications such as perforation of the atrial wall or aorta can occur.3, 4
Previous studies have evaluated the feasibility and safety of radiofrequency (RF) energy applied to a conventional needle as a technique to access the left atrium, particularly in patients with a repeat procedure, fibrotic septum or aneurysmal septum.5, 6 As a result of this earlier work, a special proprietary device has been designed. The NRG RF needle (Baylis Medical Inc., Montreal, Canada), uses radiofrequency energy emitted from the needle tip to aid in transseptal access. Despite limited literature to support its superiority and safety7-9compared to the conventional approach, the new device has become adopted in some electrophysiology procedures involving a transseptal puncture.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Radiofrequency energy needle for transseptal access
Other names: Baylis Medical Inc. transseptal needle, NRG RF transseptal needle
Mechanical needle for transseptal access
Other names: Brockenbrough Needle
Time frame: Day of procedure
Total amount of procedure time, from the beginning of the transseptal procedure until left atrium (LA) access is obtained in each patient. Participants for whom puncture failed crossed over to the other Intervention. Analysis performed on an intention-to-treat basis.
Time frame: During or immediately after procedure, up to 1 day after procedure. On average, up to 1 day after the procedure.
Time frame: at time of procedure
Failure to achieve transseptal access with the assigned needle type resulted in crossover because of an inability to puncture the interatrial septem despite forward pressure and tenting, leading to concern that further effort might lead to perforation of the free (lateral) LA wall.
Time frame: immediately prior to procedure
In ex vivo pre-procedural testing, the assigned transseptal needle was advanced through the plastic dilator and sheath, and the presence of grossly visible plastic shavings after introduction of the needle through the dilator and long sheath was recorded.
University of California, San Francisco
Other
Transseptal Needle Versus Radiofrequency Energy for Left Atrial Access (TRAVERSE-LA): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: TRAVERSE-LA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05481359
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Athens, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03940066
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Santander, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05351775
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Turku, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT01385202
Arrhythmia, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
View Trial Details