Integrated model of primary care
OtherIntervention includes: 1) consistent risk screening and assessment; 2) care coordination and system navigation; 3) patient/caregiver engagement and shared decision-making; and 4) enabling technology supports.
NCT Number: NCT03442426
It is well known that older Canadians are high users of health care services. What is less well known is that the health care system is not well-designed to meet the needs of those who use it most. Older persons look to their primary care practitioners to assess their needs and coordinate their care. Unfortunately, the health concerns of older persons are often missed in too-short office visits. They may need care from a variety of providers and services, but this care is often not well-coordinated. Older persons and their caregivers are the experts in their own needs and preferences, but often do not have a chance to participate fully in treatment decisions or care planning. As a result, they may have health problems that are not properly assessed, managed or treated resulting in poorer health, as well as preventable and expensive emergency department visits and hospital stays.
Improving the health of older Canadians means identifying health problems early. It means providing timely supports so that manageable concerns do not spiral out of control. And, above all, it means helping health care providers actively engage older patients and their family caregivers as partners in care. Patients want to make informed choices about their health and the care they receive, based on their personal values, preferences and goals, and informed by available evidence.
Nine primary care clinics in three provinces (Quebec, Ontario, Alberta) will use a quick screening tool to identify older patients who are at risk of becoming frail. This will help initiate referral to health care or support services where necessary. Innovative technology will be used to streamline the referral process and help assist older adults in decision-making about their care.
With support from the Canadian Frailty Network (CFN, formerly TVN), researchers, collaborators, health care providers and older adults from across Canada will work together to transform primary health care for frail elderly Canadians.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me70 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alberta PCNs, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
The team will be implementing evidence-based and tested interventions as a coherent strategy to enhance primary health care for older adults, working collaboratively with study sites, older adults, and other stakeholders to develop a scalable and sustainable model. The investigators aim to develop the capacity of primary health care teams to identify, assess, and support older adults (70+) who are frail, and to delay or prevent decline for those at lower risk. The project will support patient/caregiver engagement, and stronger care coordination and integration with other health and social services. The primary research question is: compared to usual care in primary care settings, does the proposed model improve health, social and economic outcomes for frail and at-risk older Canadians (aged 70+)? The investigators hypothesize that older adults will benefit from screening, active engagement in care planning, and appropriate referrals to services earlier in their care trajectories. In addition to improving health outcomes and quality of life for patients, more proactive interventions can reduce costly emergency department visits and unplanned hospital admissions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intervention includes: 1) consistent risk screening and assessment; 2) care coordination and system navigation; 3) patient/caregiver engagement and shared decision-making; and 4) enabling technology supports.
Time frame: The tool will be used at 4 time points: at baseline recruitment (B1), then 6 months later (B2), then 6 months later following intervention implementation (I1), and 6 months later (I2). Scores will be compared pre and post.
This tools measures specific items related to the Chronic Care Model, and reports on patient experience with the system. There are 5 sub scales (patient activation, delivery system, goal setting, problem solving and coordination) and 26-items. This tool has been validated.
Time frame: The tool will be used at 4 time points: at baseline recruitment (B1), then 6 months later (B2), then 6 months later following intervention implementation (I1), and 6 months later (I2). Scores will be compared pre and post.
This tool measures health-related quality of life. The tool is comprised of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression).
Time frame: This tool will be used at two time points. Once at baseline (B1) and again at the end of the study (2.5 years later) post implementation (I2). All providers involved in the work will completed the tool.
This survey addresses team function, involvement in governance, use of information technology and scope of practice.
Time frame: The tool will be used at 4 time points: at baseline recruitment (B1), then 6 months later (B2), then 6 months later following intervention implementation (I1), and 6 months later (I2). Scores will be compared pre and post.
Self-reported health care utilization data including hospital admissions; emergency department visits, home care services; specialist visits and primary care visits.
Time frame: GAS will be completed with a small sub-set of participants during qualitative interviews at baseline recruitment (B1), then 6 months later (B2), then 6 months later following intervention implementation (I1), and 6 months later (I2).
GAS is an individualized, client-centred goal-setting and measurement approach that can accommodate a client's individual wishes, values and preferences. Goals are scaled on a five-point rating scale from -2 (much less than expected) to +2 (much better than expected). The GAS formula translates the total GAS score into a standardized score, with a score of 50 representing overall goal attainment.
Time frame: This tool will be used at two time points. Once at baseline (B1) and again at the end of the study (2.5 years later) post implementation (I2).All providers involved in the work will completed the tool.
This survey is usually completed by a manager or director of the primary care site. The survey covers many domains such as human resources, accessibility, coordination, quality improvement, and system integration.
University of Waterloo
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03964363
Frail Elderly Syndrome, Frailty
München, Bavaria, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05393362
Atrophy, Cardiovascular Diseases
Málaga, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06438718
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Zaragoza, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05610605
Adherence Interventions, Behavior
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial Details