Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT01965860
To design, validate and prove cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive endovascular simulation curriculum consisting of cognitive and psychomotor skills training for endovascular management of symptomatic vascular disease in the lower limbs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
The main goal is to design a comprehensive endovascular simulation curriculum consisting of cognitive and psychomotor skills training for endovascular management of symptomatic vascular disease in the lower limbs (Rutherford classification 2-5; stenosis or occlusion in the iliac, superficial femoral and popliteal arteries). The curriculum will consist of E-learning, video-based learning and simulation exercises on the Virtual Reality simulator on which an endovascular procedure will be simulated.
Skills transferability to real life practice will be verified by means of a RCT. In this RCT the investigators will compare the cognitive knowledge and technical performance of curricular trained surgical trainees with conventionally trained trainees during treatment of patients under supervision. The hypothesis states that surgeons trained within the PROSPECT curriculum will show improved technical knowledge of endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic disease in the iliac, superficial femoral and popliteal arteries and will demonstrate increased technical proficiency in the angiosuite in comparison with surgeons who received only conventional training. Subjects will be surgical trainees (N=32). They will be randomized into a three groups: a control group (N=11), a group that only has access to E-learning (N=10) and a PROSPECT group (N=11). Both groups will continue their traditional clinical education and the PROSPECT group will additionally be trained within this endovascular curriculum. The investigators hope that this study may ultimately lead to an improvement in the quality of patient care by standardizing competencies of endovascular operators in training and practice.
Additionally a cost-effectiveness analysis of PROSPECT compared to traditional training modalities will be executed. A successful training program is expected to lead to a shortening of the learning curve, reduction in number of errors during real life procedures and more efficient use of hybrid angio suites. The financial impact of potentially shorter duration of endovascular interventions will be studied and compared to time investment and additional costs associated with stepwise, supervised training using VR simulators.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
Time frame: 6 weeks after intervention
The consultant will assess the trainee during the intervention.
For both scales, the higher the score, the better. Surrogate measures of performance are also evaluated (total procedure and fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, contrast volume and number of endovascular tools used). Post-hoc videos of hand movements and the fluoroscopy imaging recorded during the real procedure will be rated using the same scoring systems. Two real life endovascular procedures will be performed within six weeks after completing the curriculum. Evaluation will occur during the intervention and videos of hand movements and fluoroscopy imaging will be evaluated afterwards.
Time frame: Pre curriculum, 6 weeks and 3 months after completion of the curriculum (3 months only for intervention arms)
The cognitive and technical skills retention of the surgical trainee is measured by a MCQ test and a simulation based exercise, pre and post PROSPECT.
MCQ test: validated Multiple Choice Test - Range 0-20 GRS: Global Rating Scale of Endovascular Performance, modified OSATS (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) scale: to assess global performance (same as primary outcome) - Range: 11-55 Examiners checklist: Examiner Checklist for Diagnostic Angiography, Angioplasty and Stenting: to assess technical performance (same as primary objective) - Range: 17-85
For al outcome measures: the higher the score, the better
Time frame: After RCT
After the RCT, a registry was started with all participants that started PROSPECT. Outcome: do PROSPECT participants pass the curriculum, do they become proficient?
University Ghent
Other
The Study of Transferability and Cost-effectiveness of a Proficiency-based Stepwise Endovascular Curricular Training Program (PROSPECT) in Surgical Trainees
Acronym: PROSPECT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02685098
Amputation, Arterial Occlusive Disease
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02807779
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02065648
Cardiovascular Diseases, Vascular Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02863926
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
View Trial Details