Tanta University
Tanta, ElGharbia, 31527, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06710704
The aim of the study is to compare between transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency and corticosteroids injections in management of pain severity, forearm pain, functional disability and patient capability to operate daily activities in patients with lateral epicondylitis
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tanta, ElGharbia, 31527, Egypt
Lateral epicondylitis (LE), or tennis elbow, is the most common elbow pain condition. Pain in the lateral aspect of the elbow, especially the extensor tendon origin (extensor carpi radialis brevis [ECRB] and extensor digitorum communis [EDC]), is the most consistent symptom. It affects up to 3 % of the population and is usually an overload injury that often follows minor and often unrecognized trauma to the extensor forearm muscles of the forearm.
Transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency treatment is a noninvasive, needleless, painless, office/outpatient treatment that requires no recovery, sedation, or anesthesia. We were encouraged to research transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency as a treatment option because of favorable outcomes in previous trials. Therefore, transcutaneous pulsed radiofrequency treatment used successfully in a type of orthopedic surgeries, we designed this trial to examine it in the management of pain in lateral epicondylitis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Lateral epicondylitis was diagnosed when pain is elicited by two or more of these diagnostic exams:
Exclusion criteria
Patients underwent transcutaneous PRF at the affected elbow.
Patients received intraarticular injections of methylprednisolone (40 mg/ml) with 1 ml mepacaine at the point with utmost tenderness in the lateral epicondyle area under aseptic conditions.
Time frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Assessment of pain severity by visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment.
The visual analog scale (VAS) score it has 10-cm scale that represents a continuum between "0 = no pain" and "10 = worst pain."
Time frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Forearm pain wasassessed by patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE).
The Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) was also used to rate the levels of tennis elbow pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of 2 subscales:
Pain subscale - 5 items (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable). Function subscale (0 = no difficulty, 10 = unable to do) Specific activities - 6 items.
Time frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Functional disability was assessed by patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) before treatment and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment..
The Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) was also used to rate the levels of tennis elbow pain and disability from 0 to 10, and consists of 2 subscales:
Pain subscale - 5 items (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable). Function subscale (0 = no difficulty, 10 = unable to do) Specific activities - 6 items.
Time frame: 12 weeks after treatment
Patient capability to operate daily activities was evaluated using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) questionnaire before treatment and at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment.
The Quick DASH is a shortened edition of the original DASH result amount. Quick DASH was used to measure of self-rated upper-extremity disability and symptoms before. It is a 11-item and self-report questionnaire that looks at the ability of a patient to perform certain upper extremity activities, patients can rate difficulty and interference with daily life on a 5-point Likert scale (1 being no difficulty, 5 being unable).
Tanta University
Other
A Comparative Study Between Transcutaneous Pulsed Radiofrequency and Corticosteroids Injections in Management of Pain in Lateral Epicondylitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06710782
Arthritis, Chronic Pain
Tanta, ElGharbia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07371676
Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Recovery
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04838002
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Van, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07331337
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Kannur, Kerala, India
View Trial Details