Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05670522

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Versus Virtual Reality on Gait in Children With Spastic Diplegia

Spastic diplegia is the most frequent type of cerebral palsy (CP), and impaired gait is a common sequela of this condition. The investigators compared the effects of two novel research interventions transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and virtual reality (VR) on gait impairments in children with spastic diplegia.

Currently, both tDCS and VR require further investigation to determine their clinical effectiveness for children with CP. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of tDCS and VR training on spatiotemporal and kinetic gait parameters in children with spastic diplegia, as a supplemental intervention to traditional physical therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy Brain Damage, Chronic Brain Diseases Central Nervous System Diseases Nervous System Diseases

Age range

7 year–12 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

outpatient clinic run by the faculty of physical therapy at Cairo University

Giza, 12624, Egypt

About this study

Cerebral palsy (CP) is caused by early-stage brain injury, affecting 2 to 3 children in every 1000 live births. CP is divided into different subtypes depending on the dominant neurological signs: spastic, dyskinetic, or ataxic. Epilepsy and intellectual disability, as well as problems with speech, hearing, and vision, are all common complications [1]. spastic diplegic CP is one of the most common developmental disabilities throughout life, caused by large-scale changes in subcortical brain activity with a reduced activation of corticospinal and somatosensory circuits, which leads to diminished activation of the central nervous system during volitional activities.

Gait impairment is seen in 90% of children with spastic diplegic CP, stemming from this decreased cortical excitability and compounded by spasticity of the lower extremities, excessive muscular weakness, impaired joint mobility, and poor coordination and balance. Specifically, children with CP have reduced gait velocity, cadence, and stride length, among other affected spatiotemporal gait parameters. The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health consider changes in the spatial and temporal characteristics of gait to be important predictors to poor function and community participation. Additionally, crouched gait, scissoring, and other atypical gait patterns are common in this population, further affecting the kinematic and kinetic characteristics of gait and leading to metabolically expensive locomotion, high fall risk, and long-term musculoskeletal injury. For children with spastic diplegic CP, the primary goal of rehabilitation is to facilitate mobility and appropriate walking patterns with or without external assistance. Improving spatiotemporal and kinetic characteristics of gait would improve gait function, increase gait efficiency, and reduce the risk of long-term disability. In turn, it would allow these children to participate in more activities of daily living, meaningful interactions with family and society, and environmental exploration, as well as to improve their physical development.

In the current study, the investigators considered two technology-driven strategies that could potentially target gait impairments and improve gait function in children with CP: virtual reality (VR) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Both interventions have been studied for their therapeutic potential with mixed results, especially in children. Specifically, VR can simulate real-life activities while providing repetition, augmented sensory input and feedback, error reduction/augmentation to increase motivation during the rehabilitation process. As a training tool, VR provides visual perceptual stimulation resulting from dynamic changes in context, which may aid in the execution of regulated exercises while also requiring concentration and additional postural control. Neuroimaging studies suggest that VR can facilitate learning and recovery by stimulating cortical reorganization and neural plasticity. Previous research has utilized VR as a therapeutic tool for children to improve balance, walking speed, and/or distance, as well as to encourage physical activity. Additional VR therapies have been shown to enhance functional performance in activities including squatting, standing posture, and energy expenditure. With the commercialization of VR-related products like the Nintendo Wii, many virtual games are readily available for home use. These games are often designed to challenge and train balance, posture, and dynamic movements all of which are critical factors for gait. Thus, VR-based rehabilitation may offer a unique, accessible therapeutic approach to reduce gait impairments and improve dynamic function.

In contrast, tDCS is a neuromodulation technique focused on optimizing existing neural pathways to prolong and/or improve the functional gains achieved by rehabilitation. tDCS is applied through either anodal or cathodal stimulation, which corresponds to excitation or inhibition of the stimulated brain areas, respectively. Anodal stimulation enhances cortical excitability through depolarization, allowing for more spontaneous cell firing, while cathodal stimulation has an inhibitory effect through hyperpolarization. Functionally, this means application of tDCS will influence activity in the area of the brain it targets. Previous research indicates that inhibited cortical input to the corticospinal tract is a possible cause of increased spasticity in CP, so it is reasonable to predict that anodal stimulation would mitigate these symptoms in individuals with spastic CP. The neurophysiological effects of anodal tDCS can also potentiate motor learning through this increase in cortical activity, which is applicable to the treatment of all subtypes of CP. These benefits may translate into functionally improved gait as well.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosed with diplegic CP
  • the ages 7-12 years old
  • minimum spasticity grades of 1 and 1+ according to modified Ashworth Scale
  • Gross motor function classification system (GMFCS) at level I or II.
  • Independent ambulation without any assistance or with minimal assistance
  • A degree of cognition that allows understanding of the proposed procedures

Exclusion criteria

  • children who had visual impairments, hearing damage, fixed deformities at lower limbs,
  • History of orthopedic surgeries or injection with botulinum toxin in the previous year
  • Had metal implants in the skull
  • History of epilepsy or other neurological disorders
  • or inability to understand the task.

Treatment and study plan

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Device

Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), over the motor cortex, is a potential therapy option for motor control deficits in children with CP. The application of tDCS involves positioning 2 rubber electrodes sheathed in saline-soaked pads onto the scalp, held in place by a rubber strap. Low-intensity, direct-current, of 1 to 2 mA, is delivered to cortical areas from the device.

The standard-of-care gait training included various gait training and balance tasks as well as resistive exercises and passive stretching as necessary. Task-specific gait exercises included: walking in a closed indoor environment, walking in an open indoor environment, walking on various floor surfaces, and climbing stairs up and down without assistance. The children also performed dynamic balance exercises by walking on a balance board.

Virtual reality

Device

Virtual reality rehabilitation is an emerging therapy for motor rehabilitation of children with CP. The therapy is provided through a computer-simulated environment where they interact with real-world-like objects and events through sight, sound, and touch. The Wii Remote was used as the interactive interface, and standard computer/television screens were used as the display hardware. Therefore, VR therapy was of the non-immersive type.

The standard-of-care gait training included various gait training and balance tasks as well as resistive exercises and passive stretching as necessary. Task-specific gait exercises included: walking in a closed indoor environment, walking in an open indoor environment, walking on various floor surfaces, and climbing stairs up and down without assistance. The children also performed dynamic balance exercises by walking on a balance board.

Primary outcomes

  1. Gait velocity (m/s) (Pre-treatment)

    Time frame: baseline

    Gait velocity was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with the soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  2. Gait velocity (m/s) (post-treatment)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Gait velocity was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with the soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  3. Gait velocity (m/s) (Follow up)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Gait velocity was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with the soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cadence (steps/min) (Pre-treatment)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Cadence was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  2. Cadence (steps/min) (post-treatment)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Cadence was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  3. Cadence (steps/min) (Follow up)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Cadence was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  4. Stance time (s) (Pre-treatment)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Stance time was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  5. Stance time (s) (post-treatment)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Stance time was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  6. Stance time (s) (Follow up)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Stance time was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  7. Swing time (s) (Pre-treatment)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Swing time was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  8. Swing time (s) (post-treatment)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Swing time was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  9. Swing time (s) (Follow up)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Swing time was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  10. Step length (cm) (Pre-treatment)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Step length was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  11. Step length (cm) (post-treatment)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Step length was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  12. Step length (cm) (Follow up)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Step length was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  13. Stride length (cm) (Pre-treatment)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Stride length was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  14. Stride length (cm) (post-treatment)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Stride length was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  15. Stride length (cm) (Follow up)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Stride length was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  16. Maximum force (kg) (Pre-treatment)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Maximum force was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  17. Maximum force (kg) (post-treatment)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Maximum force was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  18. Maximum force (kg) (Follow up)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Maximum force was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  19. Maximum peak pressure (N/cm²) (Pre-treatment)

    Time frame: Baseline

    Maximum peak pressure was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with the soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  20. Maximum peak pressure (N/cm²) (post-treatment)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Maximum peak pressure was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

  21. Maximum peak pressure (N/cm²) (Follow up)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Maximum peak pressure was measured using Walkway Pressure Measurement System. This system consists of a digital mat inserted in a wooden walkway, equipped with sensors and a pressure recording system at a sampling resolution up to 185 Hz. A computer with soft-ware (version 7) and transmission hardware were used to download the data. Three trials were then completed to collect the gait parameters for analysis.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beni-Suef University

Other

Collaborators

  • Cairo University
  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 4, 2023
Registry last updated
Jan 11, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.