Hunter College of the City University of New York
New York, 10065, United States
NCT Number: NCT04348812
The present study tested whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) across the prefrontal cortex (PFC), versus sham stimulation, effectively augments the beneficial effects of a gamified attention bias modification training (ABMT) mobile app.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
New York, 10065, United States
Anxiety-related attentional bias (AB) is the preferential processing of threat observed in clinical and sub-clinical anxiety. Attention bias modification training (ABMT) is a computerized cognitive training technique designed to systematically direct attention away from threat and ameliorate AB, but mixed and null findings have highlighted gaps in our understanding of mechanisms underlying ABMT and how to design the most effective delivery systems. One neuromodulation technique, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) across the prefrontal cortex (PFC) may augment the effects of ABMT by strengthening top-down cognitive control processes, but the evidence base is limited and has not been generalized to current approaches in digital therapeutics, such as mobile applications. The present study tested whether tDCS across the PFC, versus sham stimulation, effectively augments the beneficial effects of a gamified ABMT mobile app. Thirty-eight adults (Mage = 23.92, SD = 4.75; 18 females) evidencing low-to-moderate anxiety symptoms were randomly assigned to active or sham tDCS for 30-minutes while receiving ABMT via a mobile app. Participants reported on potential moderators of ABMT, including life stress and trait anxiety. ECG was recorded during a subsequent stressor to generate respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) suppression as a metric of stress resilience.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
mobile attention bias modification training for anxiety, using the app Personal Zen
Other names: Personal Zen
Soterix 1X1 tDCS Limited Total Energy (LTE) Stimulator
Other names: tDCS
Time frame: Day 1
Self report using the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS); Higher scores mean more severe negative mood/worse outcomes (scores ranging from 0-42)
Time frame: Day 1
Self report of state anxiety using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); Higher scores mean greater anxiety severity/worse outcomes (scores ranging from 20-80).
Time frame: Day 1
Using the computerized, reaction time-based cognitive assessment task, the "dot probe", biased attention towards or away from threat-relevant information will be assessed based on reaction-time based scoring procedures. Higher scores mean greater bias/worse outcomes
Time frame: Day 1
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), calculated using mobile electrocardiogram, will be assessed during the Trier Social Stress Task, a standardized behavioral assessment of stress. Higher scores mean greater contribution of respiratory rate to heart rate.
Hunter College of City University of New York
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05438446
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Athens, Attica, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT07737366
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Sakarya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07712978
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Oulu, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT06406946
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
View Trial Details