Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03574038

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Neuroprotection in Acute Stroke

This proposal is a prospective, single-center, dose-escalation safety, tolerability, feasibility and potential efficacy study of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in acute stroke patients with substantial salvageable penumbra due to a large vessel occlusion who are ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of California- Los Angeles (UCLA)

Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States

About this study

This is a single center, sham-controlled, dose escalation study where cathodal tDCS is delivered to threatened but not yet irreversibly damaged (penumbral) tissue in patients with large vessel occlusion who are not eligible for blood flow restoring recanalization procedures. Patients will be randomized in a 3:1 design, to cathodal versus sham (control) stimulation, at each six designed dose tiers. The dose tiers will be increasing in both intensity and duration of the stimulation.

The occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage will determine the pace of the escalation through the dose tiers.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • New focal neurologic deficit consistent with AIS
  • NIHSS≥4 or NIHSS <4 in the presence of disabling deficits
  • Age>18;
  • Presence of any cortical vessel occlusion including ICA, branches of MCA, Anterior Cerebral artery (ACA), Posterior Cerebral artery (PCA), Posterior-Inferior cerebellar artery (PICA);
  • Presence of salvageable penumbra with Tmax> 6 sec/ ischemic core volume (ADC < 620 μm2/s or rCBF< 30%) ≥ 1.2
  • Patient ineligible for IV tPA, per national AHA/ASA Guidelines
  • Patient ineligible for endovascular therapy per AHA/ASA national Guidelines - one or more of: poor prestroke functional status (mRS score >1), mild neurological symptoms (NIHSS <6), large ischemic core (ASPECTS <6), thrombectomy not technically performable due to severe vessel tortuosity, cervical artery chronic occlusion, or other unfavorable angioarchitectural features that preclude endovascular access to the target intracranial vessel. 8) Subject is able to be treated with tDCS within 24 hours of last known well time;
  • A signed informed consent is obtained from the patient or patient's legally authorized representative

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute intracranial hemorrhage
  • Evidence of a large Ischemic core volume (ADC < 620 μm2/s or rCBF< 30%) ≥ 100
  • Presence of tDCS contraindications - electrically or magnetically activated intracranial metal and non-metal implants.
  • Severe MR contrast allergy or renal dysfunction with eGFR<30ml/min, precluding MRI gadolinium or CT iodine contrast
  • Pregnancy
  • Signs or symptoms of acute myocardial infarction, including EKG findings, on admission
  • Suspicion of aortic dissection on admission
  • History of seizure disorder or new seizures with presentation of current stroke
  • Evidence of any other major life-threatening or serious medical condition that would prevent completion of the study protocol including attendance at the 3-month follow-up visit
  • Concomitant experimental therapy
  • Preexisting scalp lesion at the site of the stimulation or presence of skull defects (may alter current flow pattern)
  • Preexisting coagulopathy, consist of platelet count of ≤ 100, INR ≥ 3, PTT ≥ 90.

Treatment and study plan

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Device

Patients will be randomized to active treatment (C-tDCS) vs sham stimulation in a 3:1 ratio. There will be 6 dose tiers, reflecting increasing intensity and duration of stimulation: Tier 1 - 1 mA, single 20 - min cycle; Tier 2- 2 mA, single 20 min cycle; Tier 3 - 1 mA, 2 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 4- 2 mA, 2 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 5 - 1 mA, 3 cycles of 20 min/20 min off; Tier 6 - 2 mA, 3 cycles of 20 min/20 min off.

Other names: C-tDCS

Sham stimulation

Other

Patients will be randomized to active treatment (C-tDCS) vs sham stimulation in a 3:1 ratio. Patients in the sham stimulation arm at all the tiers will have the cap and electrodes in place, and sham switch moved but without prolonged delivery of electrical stimulation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety Outcome: Rate of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage (SICH) in the Active Treatment Arms Compared to Sham Arm

    Time frame: At 24-hour post-stimulation

    The presence of SICH will be assessed on 24-hour post-stimulation scan. SICH will be defined as an intracranial parenchymal hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intraventricular hemorrhage with an increase of 4 or more points on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) within 24 hours of stimulation.The treatment will be considered to have exhibited adequate safety if tDCS results in lower or equivalent rates of SICH compared to sham.

    The NIHSS is a validated quantitative assessment tool to measure stroke-related neurological deficits and ranges from 0 (no neurological deficits) to a maximum of 42, indicative of a very severe level of impairment.

  2. Feasibility Outcome: Speed With Which HD C-tDCS Was Implemented

    Time frame: Time from randomization to tDCS initiation assessed up to 30 minutes

    The median time from enrollment to HD C-tDCS initiation in the last 4 enrolled patients included three Active-Tier 2 patients and one sham.

  3. Tolerability Outcome: Percentage of the Patients Completing the Protocol-assigned Stimulation Treatment

    Time frame: After 20 minutes of stimulation period

    Percentage of the patients completing the protocol-assigned stimulation treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Safety Outcome: Rate of Early Neurologic Deterioration in All Active Patients Compared to Sham Arm

    Time frame: During the 24-hour post-stimulation

    Early neurological deterioration will be defined as worsening ≥ 4 on NIHSS during the 24-hour period after stimulation without intracranial hemorrhage.

  2. Secondary Safety Outcome: Rate of Mortality in All Active Patients Compared to Sham Arm,

    Time frame: By day 90 post stimulation

    Mortality will be defined as death or modified Rankin Scale of 6.

  3. Secondary Safety Outcome: Rate of All Serious Adverse Events Occured During the 90 Days of Study Participation in All Active Patients Compared to Sham.

    Time frame: By day 90 post-stimulation

    A serious adverse event is any adverse event that is fatal, is life-threatening, is permanently or substantially disabling, requires or prolongs hospitalization, or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes. The rate of serious adverse events will be compared between the active treatment and sham patients.

Other outcomes

  1. Per-protocol Exploratory Imaging Efficacy Outcome of Imaging Biomarkers of Neuroprotection and Collateral Enhancement Excluding One Patient With no Penumbra at Baseline on Imaging Core Review and One Patient With Septic Embolization as Stroke Cause.

    Time frame: At 2-hour and 24-hour post-stimulation

    By comparing the baseline MR/CT imaging with the MR/CT imaging at 2-hour (early) and 24-hour (final) post-stimulation, the following were measured: 1) Final penumbra salvage proportion, 2) Final hypoperfusion lesion reduction, 3) Early relative quantitative cerebral blood volume (qrCBV) enhancement.

  2. Per-protocol Exploratory Clinical Efficacy Outcome: Rate of Functional Independence at 3-month in Active vs. Sham Excluding Two Patients, One With no Penumbra Was Present at Baseline on Imaging Core Review and One With Septic Embolization as Stroke Cause.

    Time frame: At day 90 post stimulation

    Rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of 0-2

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Stroke EaRly After Onset Clinical Trial

Acronym: TESSERACT

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jun 29, 2018
Registry last updated
Jun 27, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.