Francesco Nappi
Saint-Denis, France, 93200
NCT Number: NCT05261204
The mechanical intervention is treating aortic valve stenosis (AVS) which may be performed using the standard open surgical approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The key question of this study is to establish the difference in all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, all hospitalizations for heart failure within 24 months of follow-up, left ventricular reverse remodeling after adjustment for death, as assessed by means of the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), in patients who received the TAVI vs the standard surgical procedure for AVS. Any potential failure of the devices in question will be thoroughly investigated by means of CT scanning and biomechanical computational modelling, utilising finite element analysis (FEA).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–90 year
All sexes
Observational
Saint-Denis, France, 93200
The target population enrolled in the study includes patients with aortic-valve stenosis at risk to severe valve obstruction who have had TAVI or standard surgical procedure of their aortic valve with or without coronary artery by pass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, AVS, and heart failure (HF). Patients enrolled in the studies were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.
Three groups of patients are included in the study. Patients who were managed with TAVI, patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and recipients of AVR undergoing surgery with the use of sutureless aortic valve.
we calculated that a total of 649 patients per group would be needed for 90% power to show an absolute between-groups difference of 10% in the primary outcome at a two-sided alpha level of 0.02 (corrected alpha level to take into account multiple comparison between 3 groups). In this exhaustive study between 2011 and 2021, we hope to include a total of 6700 patients (2800 in the TAVI group, 3200 patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and 700 patients with the use of sutureless aortic valve).
Two supplementary studies will be conducted. The study will concentrate on the CT scan evaluation of potential morphological and functional alterations in the aortic root following implantation of the respective devices, incorporating a comparative analysis. The second study will concentrate on the biomechanics of the implanted device and potential failure, using a finite element analysis investigation.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients who are deemed receive TAVI first underwent evaluation of their peripheral arteries before the procedure, in order to separate those eligible for transfemoral placement (TFP) from those who would require transapical placement. Technological advances achieved in the new platforms for the treatment of SHD have allowed the use of reduced size catheters and sheaths in the new armamentarium, favoring the TFP technique. The transcatheter valve (TV) is positioned at the level of the native aortic valve during the final step of valve replacement, when the balloon is inflated within the native valve during a brief period of rapid ventricular pacing. The delivery system i traverses the aorta retrograde over a guidewire from its point of insertion in the femoral artery during the use of TFP. Before balloon inflation, the valve and balloon are collapsed on the catheter and fit within the sheath. After balloon inflation, the calcified native valve is replaced by the expanded TV
Other names: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Repacement
The bioprosthesis is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Other names: SAVR
The sutureless is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.
Other names: SAVR
Time frame: 5 years
The primary end point of the study is the degree of treatment failure as assessed by death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation
Time frame: 5 yeras
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of hospedalization rates for heart failure valve due to structural/ non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis
Time frame: 5 years
The primary endpoint of the study is the degree of device failure, assessed by measuring the aortic root via CT scan
Time frame: 5 years
The primary objective of the study is to assess the degree of device malfunction. This is achieved by measuring the mechanical characteristics of the aortic root using computational modelling. The modelling compares different implanted devices.
Time frame: 5 years
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of overall mortality
Time frame: 5 years
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of cardiac death
Time frame: 5 years
The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of non cardiac death
Time frame: 5 years
Composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (rate of death, stroke, subsequent mitral valve surgery, hospitalization for heart failure, or an increase in New York Heart Association class higher than one), serious adverse events, recurrent aortic regurgitation, quality of life, and rehospitalization
Time frame: 5 years
Changes from baseline parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction
Time frame: 5 years
Recurrent moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation after intervention
Time frame: 5 years
Changes from baseline Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter or Volume
Time frame: 5 years
The predetermined outcome is the assessment of changes to the aortic root.
Time frame: 5 years
Changes in the Mechanical Properties of AR Following Device Implantation Using Computational Modeling
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
Other
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Standard Surgical Aortic Valve Operation for Aortic-Valve Stenosis in Patients at Risk to Severe Valve Obstruction.
Acronym: TAVISAR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07544264
Arthropathy of Knee, Pathologic Processes
Bologna, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06433700
Arthritis Knee, Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06114069
Pathologic Processes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Al Mansurah, DK, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04688593
Arthritis, Hip Osteoarthritis
Kiel, Germany
View Trial Details