Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Enrolling by Invitation

NCT Number: NCT05261204

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Standard Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

The mechanical intervention is treating aortic valve stenosis (AVS) which may be performed using the standard open surgical approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The key question of this study is to establish the difference in all-cause and cause-specific (cardiac vs noncardiac) mortality, all hospitalizations for heart failure within 24 months of follow-up, left ventricular reverse remodeling after adjustment for death, as assessed by means of the left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), in patients who received the TAVI vs the standard surgical procedure for AVS. Any potential failure of the devices in question will be thoroughly investigated by means of CT scanning and biomechanical computational modelling, utilising finite element analysis (FEA).

Enrolling by Invitation

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Francesco Nappi

Saint-Denis, France, 93200

About this study

The target population enrolled in the study includes patients with aortic-valve stenosis at risk to severe valve obstruction who have had TAVI or standard surgical procedure of their aortic valve with or without coronary artery by pass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Individuals were adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease (CAD), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, AVS, and heart failure (HF). Patients enrolled in the studies were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II, III, or outpatient NYHA IV.

Three groups of patients are included in the study. Patients who were managed with TAVI, patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and recipients of AVR undergoing surgery with the use of sutureless aortic valve.

we calculated that a total of 649 patients per group would be needed for 90% power to show an absolute between-groups difference of 10% in the primary outcome at a two-sided alpha level of 0.02 (corrected alpha level to take into account multiple comparison between 3 groups). In this exhaustive study between 2011 and 2021, we hope to include a total of 6700 patients (2800 in the TAVI group, 3200 patients who received AVR with conventional stented xenograft and 700 patients with the use of sutureless aortic valve).

Two supplementary studies will be conducted. The study will concentrate on the CT scan evaluation of potential morphological and functional alterations in the aortic root following implantation of the respective devices, incorporating a comparative analysis. The second study will concentrate on the biomechanics of the implanted device and potential failure, using a finite element analysis investigation.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals enrolled in TAVI arm were required to have the predicted risk of operative mortality was ≥ 15% and/or a STS score of ≥ 10. A candidate who did not meet the STS score criteria of ≥ 10 was included in the study if a peer review by at least two surgeon investigators concluded and documented that the patient's predicted risk of operative mortality was ≥ 15%. For all group Senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiography derived criteria: mean gradient > 40 mm Hg or jet velocity > 4.0 m/s or an aortic valve area (AVA) of < 0.8 cm2 (or AVA index < 0.5 cm2/m2).

Exclusion criteria

  • • Patients with evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month before the intended treatment (defined as Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK-MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation.
  • Blood dyscrasias as defined : leukopenia (WBC < 3000 mm3), acute anemia (Hb < 9 mg%), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm³), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic therapy or mechanical hemodynamic support devices
  • Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction.
  • Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 20%.
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  • Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding within the prior 3 months.
  • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine (Ticlid), or clopidogrel
  • (Plavix), or sensitivity to contrast media, which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
  • For TAVI arm Native aortic annulus size < 18mm or 25mm as measured by echocardiogram.
  • Subject was offered surgery but refused surgery.
  • Recent (within 6 months) cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack.
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0mg/dL) and/or end stage renal disease requiring chronic
  • dialysis.
  • Life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions.
  • For TAVI group significant abdominal or thoracic aorta disease, including aneurysm (defined as maximal luminal diameter 5 cm or greater), marked tortuosity, aortic arch atheroma, narrowing of the abdominal aorta with particular regard for calcification and surface irregularities, or severe "unfolding" and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta. This criteria were applicable for transfemoral patients only.
  • For TAVI group Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of 14F or 18F introducer
  • For TAVI arm sheath such as severe calcification, severe tortuosity or vessels size diameter < 7 mm for 22F
  • Active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections.
  • For TAVI arm bulky calcified aortic valve leaflets in close proximity to coronary ostia.

Treatment and study plan

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Device

Patients who are deemed receive TAVI first underwent evaluation of their peripheral arteries before the procedure, in order to separate those eligible for transfemoral placement (TFP) from those who would require transapical placement. Technological advances achieved in the new platforms for the treatment of SHD have allowed the use of reduced size catheters and sheaths in the new armamentarium, favoring the TFP technique. The transcatheter valve (TV) is positioned at the level of the native aortic valve during the final step of valve replacement, when the balloon is inflated within the native valve during a brief period of rapid ventricular pacing. The delivery system i traverses the aorta retrograde over a guidewire from its point of insertion in the femoral artery during the use of TFP. Before balloon inflation, the valve and balloon are collapsed on the catheter and fit within the sheath. After balloon inflation, the calcified native valve is replaced by the expanded TV

Other names: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Repacement

Bioprothesis

Procedure

The bioprosthesis is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.

Other names: SAVR

Sutureless

Procedure

The sutureless is implanted using the SAVR procedure during median sternotomy in extracorporeal circulation. Minimally invasive procedures using a thoracotomy approach and peripheral cannulation have found widespread use.

Other names: SAVR

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment failure

    Time frame: 5 years

    The primary end point of the study is the degree of treatment failure as assessed by death, recurrent aortic valve regurgitation and reoperation

  2. Hospitalizations for Heart Failure (HF)

    Time frame: 5 yeras

    The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of hospedalization rates for heart failure valve due to structural/ non structural valve deterioration, thromboembolism and recurrent endocarditis

  3. Determining Device Malfunction Through CT Evaluation of the Aortic Root

    Time frame: 5 years

    The primary endpoint of the study is the degree of device failure, assessed by measuring the aortic root via CT scan

  4. Predictive Determination of Device Malfunction Through FEA of the Aortic Root

    Time frame: 5 years

    The primary objective of the study is to assess the degree of device malfunction. This is achieved by measuring the mechanical characteristics of the aortic root using computational modelling. The modelling compares different implanted devices.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Mortality

    Time frame: 5 years

    The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of overall mortality

  2. Cardiac Death

    Time frame: 5 years

    The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of cardiac death

  3. Non Cardiac Death

    Time frame: 5 years

    The secondary endpoint of the study is the evaluation of non cardiac death

  4. Major Adverse Cardiac or Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (rate of death, stroke, subsequent mitral valve surgery, hospitalization for heart failure, or an increase in New York Heart Association class higher than one), serious adverse events, recurrent aortic regurgitation, quality of life, and rehospitalization

  5. Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEF)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Changes from baseline parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction

  6. Echocardiographic Parameter Changes ( AVR recurrence)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Recurrent moderate-to-severe aortic regurgitation after intervention

  7. Echocardiographic Parameter Changes (LVEDD/LVEDV)

    Time frame: 5 years

    Changes from baseline Left Ventricular End Diastolic Diameter or Volume

Other outcomes

  1. CT scan evaluation of the aortic root.

    Time frame: 5 years

    The predetermined outcome is the assessment of changes to the aortic root.

  2. Finite Element Analysis Study

    Time frame: 5 years

    Changes in the Mechanical Properties of AR Following Device Implantation Using Computational Modeling

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Other

Collaborators

  • Henri Mondor University Hospital
  • Universita degli Studi di Genova

Registry information

Official study title

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Versus Standard Surgical Aortic Valve Operation for Aortic-Valve Stenosis in Patients at Risk to Severe Valve Obstruction.

Acronym: TAVISAR

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2029
First posted
Mar 2, 2022
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.