Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02941471

Transabdominal Electrical Stimulation for Constipation

Several transabdominal electrical stimulation studies have been reported for constipation in childhood. This study aims to assess the efficacy of this technique in adults with chronic constipation and compare two different electrical therapies.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

About this study

Patients with Rome III defined constipation unresponsive to medical and behavioural treatment will be randomised in a double-blind prospective trial to receive either four weeks of transabdominal electrical stimulation (TENS) or Interferential stimulation (IFC). Treatment will be self-administered at home for sixty minutes a day. The response to treatment will be assessed with the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL), the Patient-Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) tool and a bowel visual analogue scale (VAS). A bowel diary will be kept a week before and during the final week of stimulation, recording daily bowel frequency.

IFC stimulation is an effective, cheap and low risk intervention which has demonstrated efficacy for dysphagia, urinary incontinence, overactive bladder syndromes and chronic pain. The precise mechanism of its analgesic and pro-kinetic effect is unknown. The intervention is delivered by two separate continuous alternating electrical currents. Two pairs of pad electrodes are arranged in a quadripolar manner where each pair delivers a different frequency of current. It is suggested that this arrangement of stimulation improves colonic propagation. However as direct massage of the abdomen has demonstrated benefit in constipation it is argued that IFC is not a specific requirement and that non-IFC electrical stimulation over the abdomen is sufficient to evoke the same colonic and clinical responses. Owing to these questions the efficacy of this intervention will be further evaluated in adults.

This study has two aims. The primary aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of transabdominal electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in adult patients with chronic constipation. The secondary aim is to establish whether IFC was superior to non-IFC (TENS) electrical stimulation in adults with chronic constipation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18 years
  • Rome III defined constipation (frequency of defecation of less than three times a week, straining or sense of incomplete emptying associated with at least 25% of defecations. Lumpy, hard stools or anal digitation for at least 25% of defecations
  • Failed Biofeedback
  • Competent and willing to complete stimulation at home
  • Competent and willing to complete the questionnaires and bowel diaries

Exclusion criteria

  • Rectal prolapse
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease
  • Pregnancy or intention to become pregnant during trial
  • Spinal cord injuries/cauda equina syndrome
  • Other implanted electrical devices
  • Allergy to device components
  • Neurological disorders

Treatment and study plan

Interferential Stimulation

Device

Transabdominal interferential electrcial stimulation

Other names: NeuroTrac® IFC Rehab device (Verity Medical Ltd, UK).

TENS stimulation

Device

Transabdominal standard electrical stimulation

Other names: NeuroTrac® Continence device (Verity Medical Ltd, UK).

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire (PAC-QOL)

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of stimulation

    A validated tool for constipation severity assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient-Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM)

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of stimulation

    A validated tool for constipation severity assessment

  2. A bowel visual analogue scale

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of stimulation

    a bowel visual analogue scale (0-100 where 0= 'very unhappy' 100= 'very happy') based on patients' response to the question 'how happy are you with the way your bowel has been functioning'

  3. Weekly bowel and laxative diary

    Time frame: one week and 4 weeks of stimulation

    Standard bowel and laxative diary

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

St Mark's Hospital Foundation

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Double-blind Pilot Randomised Trial of Transabdominal Interferential Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Severe Chronic Constipation in Adults Unresponsive to Conservative Treatments

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Oct 21, 2016
Registry last updated
Oct 21, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.