Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil
NCT Number: NCT04546529
Parkinson disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Pain is the frequent non-motor symptom that significantly compromises the quality of life, affecting 80% of patients during the course of the disease. There is currently no evidence-based treatment for PD-related pain in general. Nociceptive pain is the most frequent pain in PD an is frequently musculoskeletal in nature. Epidural spinal cord stimulation is known to provide analgesic effects in several types of pain syndromes. Here we test analgesic effects of a non-invasive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation as an add-on treatment for nociceptive (musculoskeletal) pain directly related to Parkinson disease.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
São Paulo, 05403-900, Brazil
Background: pain is frequent non-motor symptom in Parkinson's disease (PD) that significantly compromises the quality of life, affecting 80% of patients during the course of the disease. Nociceptive pain is the most frequent subtype, mainly musculoskeletal in nature. There is currently no evidence-based treatment for PD-related pain in general. The present study tests the effectiveness and safety of non-invasive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (TsMS) to treat musculoskeletal pain directly related to PD in a sham-controlled randomized approach.
Patients and Methods: this is a randomized, sham-controlled trial including 40 subjects, aged between 18 and 85 years, with musculoskeletal pain directly related to PD, that will be randomized to receive TsMS active or TsMS sham in a 1:1 ratio. Enrollment will take place at the Pain Center of the University of São Paulo and Movement Disorders Center of the University of São Paulo.
We have decided to perform an interim analysis when 24 patients will be included in the trial in order to assess safety and calculate effect size of the active intervention, after meeting with the research and statistical board. A decision will thereafter be made to, either: 1: halt the study due to futility, 2: continue the study with a new target sample size based on the calculations made with the effect from the n= 24 sample.
Expected results: the study hypothesis is that non-invasive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation is superior to sham and it is safe to use that device in patients with nociceptive (musculoskeletal) pain in PD.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients undergoing real TsMS with coil
Patients undergoing placebo TsMS with coil
Time frame: base line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the patient assessment (2x in two months)
Number of individuals presenting 50% pain intensity reduction (on VNS 0-10 average pain of BPI item 5) in the active vs the sham group at the last (8th week) assessment compared to baseline values.
Time frame: base line (moment of inclusion) and in the last day after the final session of TMS-e (2x in two months)
Assessing by score derivated of Parkinson's Disease Pain Classification System (PD-PCS). This score range from 0 (minimum) to 90 (maximum), being considered an effective improvement in the patient's pain when the pain decreases at least in 50% from the basal score.
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention (session of stimulation)
The safety of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (TsMS) will be assessed by measuring the number of participants who experience serious events. Each serious adverse event be described in detail
Time frame: base line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)
Assess mood by hospital anxiety and depression scale
Time frame: base line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)
Assess by EuroQol- 5 Dimension
Time frame: base line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)
Assess by UPDRS part III
Time frame: base line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)
measured by brief pain inventory
Time frame: base line (moment of inclusion) and the last day of the sessions of TMS-e (2x in two months)
Assess % of very much and much improved
University of Sao Paulo
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05537597
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05998369
Abdominal Pain, Autonomic Nervous System Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04543097
Absence, Behavior
Newcastle-under-Lyme, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT02822989
Autoimmune Diseases, Connective Tissue Diseases
Manhasset, New York, United States
View Trial Details