transradial
Proceduretransradial route for coronary angiography and PCI
NCT Number: NCT02983721
The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the feasibility, success and safety of Transradial approach (TRA) verses Transfemoral approach (TFA) for diagnostic and therapeutic coronary angiography and coronary interventions, in terms of procedural time, access time, fluoroscopy time, procedural failure, , length of hospital stay in terms of days in hospital, Complications in terms of thrombophlebitis, hematoma, ecchymosis, infections thrombosis of vessel, MACE, Stroke and others.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Background: PCI has been done traditionally through transfemoral route. But now transradial and transbrachial routes are also coming up in practice. We compared transradial versus transfemoral routes for ease of operability, time for procedure, complications, and failure rates through a prospective study. Methods: 400 Patients admitted in department of cardiology for percutaneous interventions were enrolled in the study. 200 patients were assigned to each group randomly. A single team did all the procedures. Pre procedure, intra procedure and post procedure data of all the patients was collected, tabulated and analysed properly.
The variables studied include Access time ,Fluoroscopy time and overall procedure time, post procedure complications( ecchymosis ,Thrombophelibites, Hematoma, procedure access bleed), Failure rates,post procedure myocardial infarction, stroke, acute renal failure and infections.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
transradial route for coronary angiography and PCI
transfemoral route for coronary angiography and PCI
Time frame: 4 years
Access time for the procedures
Time frame: 4 years
measure of radiation exposure
Time frame: 4 years
time taken to do the full procedure
Time frame: 4 years
time period the patient stayed in the hospital
Time frame: 4 years
hematoma development at the site of puncture
Time frame: 4 years
local complication at the access site
Time frame: 4 years
at the access site
Time frame: 4 years
failure to gain access for the procedure
Sheri Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences
Other
Comparison Between Transradial and Transfemoral Routes of Coronary Angiography and Interventions
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03188705
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07468955
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kütahya, Center, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04058990
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
View Trial Details