Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701, United States
NCT Number: NCT02494336
This is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy of trans-incisional rectus sheath block to laparoscopic guided rectus sheath block for pediatric single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). umbilical hernia repair in children.
Patients aged 10-21 years old undergoing SILC for cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, or biliary dyskinesia will be screened for study inclusion. Eligible patients and their parents/guardians will be approached and, if agreeable, consented for the study pre-operatively. Patients will be randomized to receive either trans-incisional rectus sheath block or intra-operative rectus sheath block under direct laparoscopic visualization. Both will be done by the attending pediatric surgeon. The patient, patient guardians, select research team members, and Post anesthesia care unit (PACU) staff will be blinded to the method of analgesic administration.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me10 year–21 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701, United States
Regional anesthesia has been increasingly utilized for providing post-operative analgesia for a number of surgical procedures in children. Rectus sheath block and local anesthetic infiltration of the surgical site are two common modes for providing post-operative analgesia. Studies comparing the two modes have shown ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block to improve immediate pain scores and reduce use of post-operative analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing umbilical hernia repair. However, these studies have compared pre-incisional ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block to post-operative local anesthetic infiltration as a subcutaneous and/or intradermal injection. Also, to our knowledge, there are no studies evaluating the use or efficacy of laparoscopic guided rectus sheath block for pediatric single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Single-incision surgery involves performing abdominal operations though a single, small incision, usually located at the umbilicus.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of trans-incisional rectus sheath block to intra-operative infiltration of the rectus sheath under direct laparoscopic visualization via an intra-abdominal approach for providing post-operative analgesia following single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) in children.
The investigators propose a prospective study where pediatric patients who are undergoing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be randomized pre-operatively to receive either a trans-incisional rectus sheath block after facial closure but prior to skin closure or intra-operative infiltration of the rectus sheath under direct laparoscopic visualization after cholecystectomy. The primary outcome is the post-operative pain rating based on the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS) following SILC. Additional outcomes measured will include: operative times, the use of intravenous/oral opioid and/or non-opioid medication in the post-operative period, duration of analgesia following surgery based on time to first rescue analgesic, intra-operative hemodynamic changes, post-operative hemodynamic changes, incidence of side-effects, and complications. Patients/patient guardians will receive a sheet to document post-operative WBFPRS scores, oral opioid and non-opioid medication administration once discharged to home for a total of 5 days.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After removal of the gallbladder, a predetermined volume of 0.2% ropivacaine (1cc/kg, max dose 10cc, divided into equal doses bilaterally) will be administered under direct visualization into the rectus sheath bilaterally by the attending surgeon. This will be done after closure of the fascial incision but prior to closure of the skin incision.
After removal of the gallbladder, a predetermined volume of 0.2% ropivacaine (1cc/kg, max dose 10cc, divided into equal doses bilaterally) will be administered intra-abdominally under direct laparoscopic visualization into the rectus sheath bilaterally by the attending surgeon.
Ropivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic. It has been shown to be effective for peripheral nerve, caudal, and lumbar/thoracic epidural blocks and produce less motor blockade than bupivacaine after caudal administration. It will be the local anesthetic used to perform the rectus sheath block for both arms.
Other names: Naropin
Time frame: 5 days
Using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS). The WBFPRS is a visual pain rating scale in which the participant looks at pictures of faces depicting levels of pain and chooses the one that most closely resembles their own pain. The scale ranges from 0 "no hurt" to 10 "Hurts Worst."
Time frame: 1 day
Operative time is measured as the time between X and Y. Reported in minutes.
Time frame: 5 days
Amount of postoperative intravenous/oral opioid and non-opioid medications received by patient. This is being recorded as Morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/kilogram(kg) for days 1-5.
Time frame: 1 day
Amount of time in minutes until the first analgesic is given postoperatively.
Time frame: 5 days
Number of participants with side effects such as nausea, vomiting, allergic reactions.
Time frame: 30 days
Number of participants with complications such as infection, bleeding, intravascular injection, bowel puncture.
Time frame: 30 days
Total number of complications such as infection, bleeding, intravascular injection, bowel puncture.
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
Other
Trans-incisional Rectus Sheath Block Versus Laparoscopic Guided Rectus Sheath Block for Pediatric Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05283980
Acute Pain, Behavior
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05859061
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06791577
Blood Coagulation Disorders, Bruising
São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03090776
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details