Nutrition and Exercise Lab, DSB, University of Padova
Padova, 35131, Italy
NCT Number: NCT05769361
Ageing involves several physiological changes such as loss of muscle mass, muscle strength, and alteration of balance control mechanisms. Consequently, there is an increased fall risk that can lead the older adult to a reduced self-sufficiency in daily living activities. Investigating the role of different physical activities to counteract the age-related declines deserves attention. The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of two trainings performed with and without unstable devices, on dynamic balance control and lower limb strength compared to a control group that received no intervention.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Padova, 35131, Italy
The a-priori power analysis calculation reported a total sample size of 51 participants. We decided to increase the sample size of approximatively 20% hypothesizing an increment of drop-outs due to the not completely solved COVID-19 pandemic at the time of the study.
In this single-blinded randomized controlled study, both intervention groups received 24 training sessions of 45 minutes each, twice a week for 12 weeks.The two intervention groups and the control group were tested at the baseline (T0), after six weeks (T1), and after twelve weeks (T2).
Subjects of the intervention groups had to complete at least 21 out of 24 training sessions. Moreover, all subjects had to complete all the assessments. Otherwise, they were completely excluded from the data analysis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Strength and balance training using different destabilizing devices
Strength and balance training over firm surfaces
Time frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test:
Time frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test:
Time frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test:
Time frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test:
Time frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
From the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory the following parameter is calculated in the dynamic test:
Time frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
Isometric quadriceps maximal strength (Newton) measured with an instrumented chair. Specifically, a load cell is placed perpendicular to the subject's shank and collects the force in Newton expressed by the subject while sitting on the chair. The knee angle during the maximal effort is fixed at 90 degrees.
Time frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
Stand up from a chair, walk at the preferred pace to a cone at 3 meters, turn around, and walk back to the chair to sit down. The outcome is the time measured in seconds to complete the test.
Time frame: At baseline (t0), after six weeks (t1) and after 12 weeks (t2)
Walking 20 meters in a straight line at the preferred speed. The outcome is the time measured in seconds to complete the distance from the 5th to the 15th meter.
University of Padova
Other
Effect of a 12-week Training Program With Unstable Devices on Strength and Dynamic Balance in Older Adults
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04949529
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07643051
Accidental Injuries, Fall
View Trial DetailsNCT05022589
Fall
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06479694
Fall
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details