Training Medical Residents in the Use of the Venous Excess UltraSound (VExUS) Score for Bedside Volume Assessment.

The primary outcome will be a quality score, adapted from a quality score used in a previous randomized controlled trial which investigated a simulator-based training program for transoesophageal echocardiography.11 The quality score will include items commonly used for assessment of ultrasound quality: angle and depth, overall clarity, visualization of the anatomical structures, focus, doppler gain, scale and baseline resulting in a maximum achievable quality score of 100 points. If multiple images of the predefined views are captured, each image will be rated, and the best rating will be kept to calculate the final score. If a view is missing, 0 point will be awarded for that view.

All ultrasound images will be independently assessed by experts for abdominal sonography and use Doppler sonography in their daily clinical practice and are blinded to the role (resident vs. SGUM-certified physician) and training (in-person vs. remote) program of the participants.

Time required by participants to perform the ultrasound examination and interpret the images during VExUS assessment

Self-reported confidence measured using a Likert-scale questionnaire before and after training

Acceptability of the program will be assessed using a structured survey with 5-point Likert scale items based on an implementation framework (e.g., Theoretical Domains Framework). Results will be reported as mean scores or median values on a 5-point scale, where higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

The Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS) is a semi-quantitative ultrasound-based score used to assess systemic venous congestion by combining inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and Doppler flow patterns of abdominal veins, including hepatic, portal, and intrarenal veins. The score ranges from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no congestion, 1 indicating mild congestion, 2 indicating moderate congestion, and 3 indicating severe venous congestion. Higher scores indicate greater venous congestion and worse clinical status.

Acceptability, including perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation, will be explored through semi-structured interviews. Data will be analyzed using thematic analysis guided by an implementation framework.