Traditional Rehabilitation Versus Rehabilitation With the Imoove® Device for Spinal Musculoskeletal Disorders

The secondary objectives of this study are to evaluate and compare the two physical therapy techniques at 6 weeks and 6 months after the start of the rehabilitation protocol in terms of:

A - improving postural stability and visual control on an unstable surface (with and without visual control)

B - improving levels of abdominal strength (Ito test) and erector spinae (Sørensen test)

C - the impact of back pain on daily life using questionnaires (Dallas, Québec, FABQ and Tampa questionnaires/scores)

D - Improvement of pain (Visual Analog Scale),

Inclusion criteria

• The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
• The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
• The patient is available for 6 months of follow-up
• Patients with pain in the lumbar spine (low back pain) for at least 3 months, not in connection with an operation

Exclusion criteria

• The patient is participating in another study
• The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
• The patient will have difficulties with follow-up (the patient is about to move, or isn't motivated)
• The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
• The patient refuses to sign the consent
• It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
• The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
• The patient has already participated in a dynamic physical therapy program
• The patient has a contraindication for a treatment used in this study
• The patient has had surgery in the past year
• The patient has a pathology that can interfere with the physical therapy regimen (heart failure, respiratory failure, major orthopedic problems)