University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
NCT Number: NCT04392336
This study will examine the efficacy of a feedback system for providers that tracks patient trust/respect on an ongoing basis and to test the hypothesis that receiving feedback on trust/respect will lead to improvements in patient satisfaction, functioning, symptoms, and trust/respect.
.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
This is a randomized effectiveness trial in which real-world providers will be given feedback on patient trust/respect. Approximately 40 clinicians, and up to 180 consumers will be enlisted participate in the randomized effectiveness trial. All enrolled patients will complete the BASIS-24, the Satisfaction with Care scale, and the Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities Scale on handheld tablets or desktop computers at baseline. Patients will be randomized to one of two conditions. Patients in the first condition will attend therapy with clinicians who have received a standard automated outcome report, plus a report that contains information on the patient's trust/respect with suggestions for interventions if low/declining trust/respect is apparent. Patients in the second condition will attend therapy and complete the same measures as patients in the first condition, but their therapists will only receive a standard automated outcome report, without any patient information on trust/respect. At the time of the first therapy appointment and for all remaining therapy appointments, patients will complete four total measures: the new measure of trust/respect, the BASIS-24, the Satisfaction with Care scale, and the Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities scale.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This feedback includes information on the level of trust/respect that a consumer has for their clinician in addition to symptom feedback.
Time frame: Up to 12 sessions, an average of 3 months
Evaluates satisfaction with social roles and activities. Raw scores range from 4 to 20. This is a longitudinal assessment of change between multiple time points.
Time frame: Up to 12 sessions, an average of 3 months
The 24-item Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale is used to determine overall well-being. Scores range from 0 to 4. Lower scores indicate overall better well-being. This is a longitudinal assessment of change between multiple time points.
Time frame: Up to 12 sessions, an average of 3 months
Asks participants questions regarding trust/respect for their clinician. Scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater trust/respect. This is a longitudinal assessment of change between multiple time points.
Time frame: Up to 12 sessions, an 3 months
Evaluates satisfaction with care. Raw scores range from 1 to 7. This is a longitudinal assessment of change between multiple time points.
University of Pennsylvania
Other
Development and Validation of a Feedback System for Tracking and Improving Trust/Respect in an Economically Disadvantaged Behavioral Health Population
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.