Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04721561

Towards Understanding Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke

After a stroke, more than two out of three patients experience problems with upper limb movement and sensation. During the past decade, robotic technology has been increasingly used to asses these problems in a detailed and accurate manner. However, sensory processing, one of the most important sensory functions, has not been assessed using robotic technology yet. Therefore, the investigators have developed a robotic assessment of sensory processing. During this study, the investigators aim to initially validate this novel assessment. The investigators aim to examine 20 chronic stroke patients and 20 age-matched healthy controls using the robotic assessment on one hand, and a set of existing clinical assessments on the other hand. The investigators hypothesize that stroke patients will have a poorer performance on this novel robotic assessment compared to age-matched healthy controls, and that these findings are similar to what is found with existing clinical assessments.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

KU Leuven

Leuven, 3001, Belgium

About this study

Up to 70% of stroke survivors show upper limb impairments consisting of motor and/or somatosensory impairments. These impairments often persist well into the chronic stage, and may lead to significant limitations in activities of daily living and may negatively affect quality of life. It is therefore of utmost importance to accurately assess upper limb impairments. Clinical assessments exist for both motor and somatosensory function, but lack good psychometric properties. Robotic technology show promising potential and is readily available to assess motor function and proprioception. Robotic assessment for sensory processing is currently not yet available, despite being the most relevant somatosensory function. Indeed, sensory processing shows the strongest association with upper limb movement, and only shows incomplete recovery at 6 months after stroke.

The investigators recently developed a novel robotic assessment of sensory processing, using the Kinarm End-Point Lab (BKIN Technologies Ltd., Canada). This cross-sectional study was set up to initially validate this novel robotic assessment and to collect pilot data to form the basis for future research. 20 chronic stroke patients and 20 age-matched controls will be recruited and will undergo extensive clinical and robotic assessment of upper limb motor and somatosensory function. The investigators hypothesize stoke patients with sensory processing deficits to have a worse performance on this novel robotic assessment compared to healthy controls and patients without sensory processing deficits. The investigators also hypothesize to see moderate to high correlations between the robotic assessment of sensory processing, and clinical assessments for both somatosensory and motor function.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

- Stroke Patients:

  • At least 18 years old
  • A first-ever unilateral, supratentorial stroke (as defined by WHO)
  • In the chronic phase after stroke (i.e. being at least 6 months after stroke)
  • The ability to perform, at least to some extent, active shoulder abduction and wrist extension against gravity

Exclusion criteria

- Stroke Patients:

  • Any serious musculoskeletal and/or other neurological conditions
  • Serious communication or cognitive deficits
  • No written informed consent

Inclusion criteria

- Healthy Controls:

  • At least 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

- Healthy Controls:

  • History of stroke or TIA
  • Upper limb somatosensory and/or motor impairments
  • Any serious musculoskeletal and/or other neurological conditions
  • Serious communication or cognitive deficits
  • No written informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Kinarm: sensory processing task

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Newly-developed task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab used to assess passive and active sensory processing

Secondary outcomes

  1. Kinarm: position matching task

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Assessment of limb position sense using a 9-target mirror-matching task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab

  2. Kinarm: visually guided reaching

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Assessment of motor function using a 4-target centre-out reaching task on the Kinarm End-Point Lab

  3. Erasmus modified Nottingham sensory assessment

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of sensory processing with an area under the curve based scoring system, with higher scores meaning better performance

  4. Tactile discrimination test

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of sensory processing with an area under the curve based scoring system, with higher scores meaning better performance

  5. Tactile functional object recognition

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of sensory processing on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 42, with higher scores meaning better performance

  6. Stereognosis section of the original Nottingham sensory assessment

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of sensory processing on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 22, with higher scores meaning better performance

  7. Wrist position sense test

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of wrist position sense on a continuous scale, with lower scores meaning better performance

  8. Perceptual threshold of touch

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    TENS-based assessment of exteroception on a continuous scale, with lower scores meaning better performance

  9. Fugl-Meyer upper extremity assessment

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of motor function on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 66, with higher scores meaning better performance

  10. Action research arm test

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of motor activity performance on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 57, with higher scores meaning better performance

  11. Barthel index

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of activities of daily living on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 20, with higher scores meaning better performance

  12. Montreal cognitive assessment

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of cognitive function on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores meaning better performance

  13. Star cancellation test

    Time frame: Once in the chronic phase (at least 6 months after stroke)

    Clinical assessment of visuospatial neglect on an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 54, with higher scores meaning better performance, and a score below 44 indicating the presence of visuospatial neglect

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

KU Leuven

Other

Collaborators

  • Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Registry information

Official study title

Robotic Assessment of Upper Limb Passive and Active Sensory Processing in the Chronic Phase After Stroke

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jan 22, 2021
Registry last updated
Mar 29, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.