University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
NCT Number: NCT05847881
The purpose of this study is to introduce and test the usefulness of a reflective process meant to empower people with chronic pain and help support participant's resiliency and thriving.
The study team hypothesizes that:
-Greater or equal to 80 percent of participants will report that the intervention was relatively easy to understand after orientation, low burden, potentially effective, and will have completed at least 2 of the 3 reflective tools.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After the kick-off meeting participants will complete the cultural probe kit for 3 weeks. This kit is a design research tool, to prompt participants to document, map, journal, and reflect on various aspects of daily lives. Following this, participants will attend a facilitated workshop and then complete the next at-home kits.
Time frame: Baseline (T1) to Exit Interview (T4), up to 68 days
The timepoints were as follows: consent and survey (T1), Kick-off Meeting (T2), Workshop (T3), and Exit Interview (T4). Participants had to attend the Kick-off Meeting (T2) to be considered engaged in the intervention. Participants who did not attend the Kick-off Meeting (T2) were withdrawn. Participants who did not attend the Workshop (T3) could still attend the Exit Interview (T4).
Time frame: at T4 Exit Interview, up to 68 days
Participants completed the PGIC at the exit interview. The PGIC had one question with seven options ranging from -3 to 3: very much worse (-3), much worse (-2), minimally worse (-1), no change (0), minimally improved (1), much improved (2), very much improved (3). A higher score indicated greater improvement since the start of the study.
Time frame: Up to 68 days
There were 4 questions in this questionnaire. For each question, participants selected one of five options, ranging from "not at all" (1) to "very much" (5). Total scores ranged from 4 to 20 points, where higher scores indicated more pain interference. Since this survey was discussing the change in the pain interference, a negative score indicated less pain interfering with day-to-day activities.The change betwen the baseline (T1 and Exit Interview (t4) is reported.
University of Michigan
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07145788
Agnosia, Chronic Pain
Stuttgart, Auerbachstraße 112, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07426497
Chronic Pain, Coccydynia
Istanbul, Sisli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06931158
Chronic Low-back Pain, Chronic Pain
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06842381
Chronic Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Almería, Almeria, Spain
View Trial Details