Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00275561

Topical Steroid Treatment for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

This was a randomized controlled trial of swallowed fluticasone vs. placebo for eosinophilic esophagitis. Eosinophilic esophagitis is an inflammatory condition in which the wall of the esophagus becomes filled with large numbers of eosinophils, a type of white blood cell. Patients who have this condition have difficulty in swallowing (dysphagia) solid food.

Prior to treatment the patients had biopsies of their esophagus and took questionnaires regarding their symptoms. Treatment was given for 6 weeks, after which biopsies were taken from the esophagus to measure any changes in the tissue from before treatment. The primary endpoint was improvement in dysphagia as measured by the validated Mayo Dysphagia Questionaire. Secondary outcomes included partial symptom response, and histologic (tissue) response to treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This was a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial to evaluate the effect of aerosolized fluticasone therapy on symptomatic dysphagia and histologic eosinophilia in adults newly diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Participants were randomized to receive aerosolized swallowed fluticasone 880 mcg bid or placebo inhaler swallowed bid for 6 weeks.

Four mid esophageal biopsies were obtained from 10 cm above the squamo-columnar junction; then formalin-fixed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All esophageal biopsies were read and scored by a single expert gastrointestinal pathologist. The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded esophageal biopsies were retrieved and underwent standard major basic protein (MBP) immunofluorescence staining. All special stain slides were then read and scored by another pathologist. 24-hour urine was collected for free cortisol by the standard technique. The original endoscopy was performed before the patient was enrolled in the trial by standard clinical technique. The endoscopy post treatment was done in the clinical research unit by the principal investigator.

Patients kept compliance logs that were reviewed at phone interviews at 2 and 4 weeks time and at the end of study evaluation. Ninety percent compliance was required for study inclusion.

At the end of 6 weeks, a 24-hour urine cortisol was done, and patients underwent a repeat endoscopy while still on treatment. Mid-esophageal biopsies were obtained and evaluated for eosinophil density and mast cell degranulation. At this visit the patients returned dysphagia and side effects questionnaires.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • > 20 eosinophils / hpf on biopsies from mid esophagus (hpf = high-powered field)
  • Abnormal dysphagia questionnaire (question 1a "yes", question 1c > "moderate" and question 2 > "less than once a week") on Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire.

Exclusion criteria

  • Clinical evidence of infectious process potentially contributing to dysphagia (e.g., candidiasis, cytomegalovirus, herpes)
  • Systemic or topical steroid therapy for any reason over the past 3 months
  • Previous steroid treatment for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Intolerance to steroid therapy in the past
  • Other cause of dysphagia identified at endoscopy (e.g., reflux esophagitis, stricture, web, ring, achalasia, esophageal neoplasm)
  • Dilatation of esophagus at time of index endoscopy

Treatment and study plan

Fluticasone

Drug

Aerosolized swallowed fluticasone 880 mg twice a day

Other names: Flonase, Veramyst

Placebo

Drug

Placebo inhaler swallowed twice a day for 6 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Complete Response to Dysphagia

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Measured by the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire, a validated 28 item instrument; 0=no dysphagia, higher levels indicate greater dysphagia severity. A complete symptom response was defined as an answer of "no" to the question "In the past 2 weeks, have you had trouble swallowing, not associated with other cold symptoms (such as strep throat or mono)?"

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Partial or Complete Response to Dysphagia

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    Measured by the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire, a validated 28 item instrument; 0=no dysphagia, higher levels indicate greater dysphagia severity. A complete symptom response was defined as an answer of "no" to the question "In the past 2 weeks, have you had trouble swallowing, not associated with other cold symptoms (such as strep throat or mono)?" A partial symptom response was defined as an answer of yes to the above question and a decrease in severity of at least 2 levels, or a decrease in frequency of at least 1 level.

  2. Number of Participants With Complete Histologic Response

    Time frame: 2 weeks

    A complete histologic response was defined as >90% decrease in mean eosinophil count/high powered field

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial of Swallowed Fluticasone in Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jan 12, 2006
Registry last updated
May 8, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.