Allergie-Zentrum-Charité, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, D-10117, Germany
NCT Number: NCT01963793
Topical Aprepitant in Prurigo Patients - An Exploratory Phase IIa Trial With Topically Applied Aprepitant in Patients With Prurigo
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Berlin, D-10117, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Aprepitant gel (10 mg/g)
Other names: Aprepitant gel
gel without active component
Other names: aprepitant gel vehicle
Time frame: At end of treatment (Day 28)
At end of treatment (Day 28) participants assessed the intensity of present pruritus of each treated area on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score of "0" (no itch at all) to "10" (worst imaginable itch) at the two extremes on a 100 mm line.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28), and Day 42
At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42, participants assessed the intensity of present pruritus of each treated area on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score of "0" (no itch at all) to "10" (worst imaginable itch) at the two extremes on a 100 mm line.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42, participants assessed their prurigo on each treated area using the following score: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. The change was calculated as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline. The change at Day 1 was therefore 0 and negative values represent a decrease in score.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator assessed the clinical picture at each treated area at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 using the following score:
Criteria:
Crusts
Evaluation:
0 = not existing
The score will be an integer on the scale 0-3.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator will assess the clinical picture at each treated area at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 using the following score:
Criteria:
Erythema
Evaluation:
0 = not existing
The score will be an integer on the scale 0-3.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator will assess the clinical picture at each treated area at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 using the following score:
Criteria:
Scratch artefacts: Superficial damage to the skin caused by severe scratching.
Evaluation:
0 = not existing
The score will be an integer on the scale 0-3.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator will assess the clinical picture at each treated area at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 using the following score:
Criteria:
Infiltration
Evaluation:
0 = not existing
The score will be an integer on the scale 0-3.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The (sub)investigator will made the following clinical assessment:
Transepidermal water loss was defined as amount of released water from skin surface in g/cm^2 per hour. The TEWL is increased in case of damage of skin barrier.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The skin colour of the participants was evaluated by use of a Mexameter spectrophotometer. The instrument computed an erythema index (with a range between 0 and 999, where higher values indicate more erythema or redness) which may be used as an indication of skin properties.
Mexameter measurements were performed at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 to assess stimulation of microcirculation, irritating effects, and occurring erythema.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The skin colour of the participants was evaluated by use of a Mexameter spectrophotometer. The instrument computed an erythema index (with a range between 0 and 999, where higher values indicate more erythema or redness) which may be used as an indication of skin properties.
Mexameter measurements were performed at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 to assess stimulation of microcirculation, irritating effects, and occurring erythema.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The skin colour of the participants was evaluated by use of a Mexameter spectrophotometer. The instrument computed a melanin index (with a range between 0 and 999, where higher values indicate more melanin) which may be used as an indication of skin properties.
Mexameter measurements were performed at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 to assess stimulation of microcirculation, irritating effects, and occurring erythema.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42
The skin colour of the participants was evaluated by use of a Mexameter spectrophotometer. The instrument computed a melanin index (with a range between 0 and 999, where higher values indicate more melanin) which may be used as an indication of skin properties.
Mexameter measurements were performed at baseline (Day 1), Day 14, end of treatment (Day 28) and Day 42 to assess stimulation of microcirculation, irritating effects, and occurring erythema.
Time frame: From baseline to Day 31
During the trial participants completed a diary twice daily, in the morning and in the evening, each covering the preceding 12 hours, which collected the number of hours with pruritus within the last 12 hours on both areas by use of a 7-point scale (<0.5 hours, 0.5-1 hours, 1-2 hours, 3-4 hours, 5-6 hours, 7-8 hours, 9-12 hours).
Duration of pruritus was categorized as follows: 1 if <0.5 hours, 2 if 0.5-1 hours, 3 if 1-2 hours, 4 if 3-4 hours, 5 if 5-6 hours, 6 if 7-8 hours and 7 if 9-12 hours.
The evening baseline measure was taken on the evening of Day -1 and the morning baseline measure was taken on the morning of Day 1 before cream was applied.
Time frame: From baseline to Day 31
During the trial participants completed a diary twice daily, in the morning and in the evening, each covering the preceding 12 hours, which collected the average intensity of pruritus since last evaluation by use of a VAS (ranging from 0 to 100). The participants assessed the intensity of present pruritus of each treated area on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score of "0" (no itch at all) to "10" (worst imaginable itch) at the two extremes on a 100 mm line.
The evening baseline measure was taken on the evening of Day -1 and the morning baseline measure was taken on the morning of Day 1, before cream was applied.
Time frame: From baseline to Day 31
During the trial participants completed a diary twice daily, in the morning and in the evening, each covering the preceding 12 hours, which collected the maximum intensity of pruritus since last evaluation by use of a VAS (ranging from 0 to 100). The participants assessed the intensity of present pruritus of each treated area on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score of "0" (no itch at all) to "10" (worst imaginable itch) at the two extremes on a 100 mm line.
The evening baseline measure was taken on the evening of Day -1 and the morning baseline measure was taken on the morning of Day 1 before cream was applied.
Time frame: Day 28
On the last day of treatment, participants assessed the change of pruritus compared to baseline in percentage by use of a VAS (ranging from 0 to 100). The participants assessed the intensity of present pruritus of each treated area on a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score of "0" (no itch at all) to "10" (worst imaginable itch) at the two extremes on a 100 mm line.
LEO Pharma
Industry
Topical Aprepitant in Prurigo Patients An Exploratory Phase IIa Trial With Topically Applied Aprepitant in Patients With Prurigo
Acronym: iTAPP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04950127
Bile Duct Diseases, Biliary Tract Diseases
Erlangen, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT07641530
Hemodialysis, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06800755
Dry Skin, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Gdansk, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07478133
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms, Pruritus
Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
View Trial Details