University Hospital Waterford
Waterford, X91 ER8E, Ireland
NCT Number: NCT06274905
This study aims to assess if EMLA or ethyl chloride spray are effective in reducing the pain associated with local anaesthetic administration in cutaneous surgery of the head and neck compared to a placebo and control group through a randomized control trial study design.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Waterford, X91 ER8E, Ireland
Operations on cutaneous tissues of the head and neck are some of the most frequently performed types of operation performed. They can often successfully be performed using local anaesthetic (LA). However, tissues in this anatomic area are some of most sensitive tissues in the body to nociceptive pain. As such, local anaesthetic can be a distressing experience for patients in many ways. Unfortunately, it is also the most common anatomical site for cutaneous malignancies. The majority of these lesions are resected under local anaesthetic. However, one of the major disadvantages of local anaesthetic such as lidocaine is pain during administration.
Several interventions have been used to reduce pain from needles and injections including ethylene chloride cryoanalgesic spray and topical anaesthetic agents including EMLA (lidocaine and prilocaine) and Ametop ointments. These have been extensively used in paediatric populations with great success to reduce pain during procedures requiring hypodermics such as cannulation. Several studies have trialled these interventions in adult populations across a variety of anatomical locations with variable results. The investigators aim to assess the efficacy of EMLA and ethyl chloride in mitigating nociceptive pain associated with local anaesthetic administration in patients undergoing cutaneous head and neck surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
EMLA cream
Ethyl chloride
Aqueous cream
Time frame: The pain score is measured essentially immediately after administration of the local anaesthetic (within 20 seconds of administration).
The primary outcome measure is patient reported pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS)(1; no pain, 10; worst pain imaginable) recorded after LA administration
Time frame: The overall patient satisfaction score is measured essentially immediately after the operation had concluded (within 20 seconds of completion).
Patient satisfaction measured on NRS scale of 1=not bad at all, to 10=worst experience imaginable recorded immediately postoperatively
University Hospital Waterford
Other
Topical Anaesthesia in Cutaneous Head and Neck Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05283980
Acute Pain, Behavior
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05476575
Acute Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
New Taipei City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT06062108
Acute Pain, Chronic Pain
Draguignan, Var, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07249827
Acute Pain, Agnosia
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial Details