Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06430710

Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices (TAD) Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite

Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system (TADs) for the correction of anterior deep overbite

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Deep Overbite Malocclusion Malocclusion, Angle Class II Overbite Stomatognathic Diseases Tooth Diseases

Age range

15 year–22 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Al-Azhar University

Cairo, Egypt

About this study

this study determined which method was more compliant, efficacy and comfortable. It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and temporary anchorage devices (TADs) [miniscrew] and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors. It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Class I or Class II malocclusion with minimal crowding.
  • 70% to 100% overbite.
  • High lip line with gingival display on smiling and super-eruption of maxillary incisors.
  • All patients had permanent dentition with average to vertical growth pattern and curve of Spee of 4mm or less.

Exclusion criteria

  • Having missing teeth on the anterior maxillary area.
  • Any history of trauma or root canal treatment.
  • Previous orthodontic treatment.
  • Low lip line duing social smile.
  • Having any hormonal disorder or syndromes.

Treatment and study plan

Intrusion

Device

2 different methods for incisor intrusion

Primary outcomes

  1. Measure distance of insicors intrusion

    Time frame: 2 years

    measure in mm the distance of apical movement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Time frame: 8 months

    By unit on Visual Analogue Scale

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite;Oral Hygiene, Pain and Treatment Effect

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 28, 2024
Registry last updated
May 28, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.