Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03793816

Tonsillectomy Using BiZact™ - a Randomized Side-controlled Clinical Trial

Tonsillectomies are frequently followed by severe postoperative pain, hence high analgetics consumption and prolonged hospitalization. Also, postoperative hemorrhages can be hazardous. Constant evaluation of surgical techniques is paramount to improve safety and cost-effectiveness. Frequently tonsillectomies are performed in cold steel technique. Aim of this study will be the evaluation of handling, surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative hemorrhage rates using the BiZactTM-Device in comparison to traditional techniques on the contralateral side. In one patient, two different techniques will be used.

The primary objective will be the surgical time. Regardless of surgeon handedness, surgeons will randomly be assigned to either start with the left or right tonsil, and randomly either to start with the BiZact™ Device or with "cold steel" methods.

Additionally, time to stop bleeding, intraoperative blood loss, tonsil mobility, device handling, as well as wound healing will be assessed.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Although stricter indication criteria have been implanted (especially in Austria since 2008), tonsillectomies are still performed very frequently. Post-surgical bleeding can potentially be life-threatening, and occur within 3 weeks after tonsillectomy. A broad survey in Great Britain revealed a postoperative hemorrhage rate in 33.921 patients between 1.5 and 5.4 %, varying on hospital size. Small collectives also showed rates up to 21.7%.

Worldwide, different techniques are used. Generally, "cold" steel and "hot" techniques can be distinguished, although often current-carrying ("hot") and "cold" instruments are used alternately. Postoperative pain seems to be uninfluenced by technique, whereas postoperative hemorrhage rates seem to be higher in "hot" techniques.

LigaSure® is a bipolar "current-carrying" device, which is able to seal vessels. Simultaneously tissue impedance is measured to control energy application. In this way only the required energy levels are applied. Therefore LigaSure® can also be referred as a "softened hot" technique.

In 2005 Lachanas et al. compared the LigaSure®-technique with the "cold" steel technique in 200 patients and found significantly less postoperative pain in favor of the LigaSure®-technique. Postoperative hemorrhage rates were not higher with LigaSure®. Based on the LigaSure®-scissors, Medtronic introduced a device specifically developed and licensed for tonsillectomies (BiZactTM).

Aim of this study will be the evaluation of handling, surgical time, postoperative pain and postoperative hemorrhage rates in comparison to traditional techniques on the contralateral side. In one patient, two different techniques will be used. This side-controlled evaluation of surgical techniques in tonsillectomies has been proven successfully in previous studies.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 14 and older
  • Written informed consent (in case of underage participant also parental informed consent)
  • Assigned for Tonsillectomy on both sides due to chronic tonsillitis

Exclusion criteria

  • History of abscesses in tonsillar region
  • Coagulation disorder (as assessed by a coagulation questionnaire and blood results)
  • Suspicion of untreated malignancy of any kind
  • Planned removal of only one tonsil

Treatment and study plan

BiZactTM Open Sealer/Divider

Device

The BiZactTM Open Sealer/Divider creates a seal by application of radiofrequency (RF) electrosurgical energy to blood and lymphatic vessels or tissue bundles interposed between the jaws of the instrument. A cutting blade within the instrument is surgeon-activated to divide tissue. It is a single-use device and will not be reused in other patients.

Primary outcomes

  1. surgical time

    Time frame: 1 hour (intraoperative)

    For the aim of the study surgical time is defined as time from superior mucosal incision to the moment when the removed tonsil is placed on instrument table (recorded by theatre staff - stopwatch).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to stop bleeding

    Time frame: 1 hour (intraoperative)

    Time to stop bleeding per side after tonsil removal (recorded by theatre staff - stopwatch)

  2. intraoperative blood loss

    Time frame: 1 hour (intraoperative)

    intraoperative blood loss as measured by A) secretion/blood volume in suction device side separately B) number of used swabs C) swab weight (documented by surgical assistant, side separately at the earliest time point after removal out of the oral cavity - weighing scale provided only for this investigation)

  3. Postoperative pain assessment

    Time frame: Day of surgery until 2 months after surgery

    Postoperative pain assessment A) using a side specific questionnaire (visual analogue scales (VAS-Scale) 0-100mm: differences of more than 16mm can be judged as significant in style of Bijur et al. 2001) on days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 10.

    B) follow-up phone call 2 months after surgery (or in-visit as preferred by the patient) assesses for swallowing difficulties and residual pain in side comparison.

  4. Wound healing

    Time frame: approx. 10 days after surgery

    Wound healing on a VAS-Scales for each side (from 0 very nice tissue / no inflammation to 100mm scale very thick fibrin / strong inflammation as seen by redness/secretion) (evaluated by ENT specialist not familiar with previous randomized side in course of postoperative follow-up visit including review of histological findings)

  5. Tonsil mobility intraoperatively

    Time frame: intraoperative

    Tonsil mobility intraoperatively on a VAS-Scales for each side (from 0 not mobile to 100mm very easy to move)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Vienna

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jan 4, 2019
Registry last updated
Jan 5, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.