Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05426421

Tolerability of Lopinavir Versus Dolutegravir for Children and Adolescents Living With HIV

Dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy is set to be increasingly replace ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based regimens for the treatment of paediatric HIV. This prospective cohort study aims to compare tolerability, adverse effects, and virological outcomes between the two regimen types using a before-after design. The study is conducted in Lesotho, southern Africa, and includes children and adolescents transitioning from ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy. It aims to provide detailed information on treatment tolerability and to inform paediatric treatment programmes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Dolutegravir, an antiretroviral drug to treat HIV, has recently been rolled out on a large scale across much of Africa. With paediatric formulations becoming increasingly available, dolutegravir is set to replace ritonavir-boosted lopinavir as the core agent in paediatric treatment regimens in many countries. While both drugs are well-studied and highly effective, they reportedly differ with regards to their tolerability at least in adults, with ritonavir-boosted lopinavir typically associated with gastrointestinal adverse effects and dolutegravir mostly associated with neuropsychiatric adverse effects including insomnia. Resistance patterns also differ between these two treatment options. However, studies focusing specifically on the tolerability of and adverse effects associated with either drug in children and adolescents are scarce.

This prospective cohort study aims to i) compare treatment satisfaction, health-related quality of life, tolerability, and symptoms or side-effects associated with either drug option, ii) specifically compare sleep outcomes quantified through actigraphy with either drug option, and iii) provide observational evidence on virological outcomes in a resource-limited setting using a before-after design.

The study is conducted at several sites in Lesotho, southern Africa. It enrols children and adolescents <18 years of age who are taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-based therapy at enrolment and routinely due to transition to dolutegravir-based therapy as per the national roll-out plan. On the day of transitioning to dolutegravir as well as four weeks thereafter, participants will complete questionnaires on treatment satisfaction, gastrointestinal symptoms, depressive symptoms, and sleep habits. A subset of participants fulfilling additional inclusion criteria will additionally use actigraphy sensors to monitor sleep duration and sleep fragmentation; these individuals will have study visits two weeks before transition to dolutegravir to initiate actigraphy, at transition, as well as two and four weeks after transition, with questionnaires at all but the pre-transition visit and actigraphy (target: at least seven nights with high-quality data) between all visits. For all participants, medical records will be assessed and additional clinical and sociodemographic data collected. A viral load test will be done on the day of transitioning to dolutegravir, and subsequent routine viral load test results (every six months as per national guidelines) will be assessed. Dried blood spots will be taken at all visits, barring the pre-transition visit for those with actigraphy.

This study aims to inform the continued roll-out of dolutegravir replacing ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in paediatric antiretroviral therapy regimens, notably assessing the suitability of a one-size-fits-all approach and providing detailed information on tolerability and adverse effects of either regimen.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

- general:

  • Currently taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-containing antiretroviral therapy
  • Eligible for dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy as per national roll-out/guidelines
  • Age < 18 years
  • Informed consent (as per consenting procedures)

Exclusion criteria

- general:

  • No transition to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy foreseen
  • Already enrolled in another study judged as non-compatible by the Principal Investigator or Local Principal Investigator

Inclusion criteria

- actigraphy:

  • Enrolled into main cohort
  • Age ≥6 and <18 years
  • Taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-containing antiretroviral therapy for at least 12 weeks
  • Last viral load <50 copies/mL and taken within <36 weeks and while taking ritonavir-boosted lopinavir-containing antiretroviral therapy
  • Willingness to wear an actimetry sensor every night for at least 7 nights (daytime wearing optional)
  • Patient and/or caregiver judged to be able to fulfil requirements (wearing actimetry sensor; filling in sleep diary) by study team member conducting screening
  • Stated ability to attend all study visits
  • Informed consent (as per consenting procedures)

Exclusion criteria

- actigraphy:

  • Intention to transfer out of the study site (and not into a different study site) within 6 weeks
  • No actimetry sensor available

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Sleep duration during monitoring period 3 (2-4 weeks post-transition) versus monitoring period 1 (0-2 weeks pre-transition)

    Time frame: [2-4 weeks post-transition] vs [0-2 weeks pre-transition]

    Sleep will be monitored using actigraphy sensors for a subset of participants. There will be three sleep monitoring periods: 0-2 weeks before transition from ritonavir-boosted lopinavir- to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (period 1), 0-2 weeks after transition, and 2-4 weeks after transition). We will conduct a before-after analysis.

  2. Change in treatment satisfaction, assessed using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (HIVTSQ) change version (HIVTSQ-c)

    Time frame: 4 weeks post-transition

    10-item scale with each item scored from -3 to +3 (overall range -30 to +30), with higher scores indicating increases in treatment satisfaction

Secondary outcomes

  1. Viral suppression rate among those with virological data

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after transition

    Proportion of participants with a viral load <50 copies/mL among all participants with virological data

  2. Engagement in care with viral suppression

    Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after transition

    Proportion of participants with a viral load <50 copies/mL among all participants

  3. Sleep duration during monitoring period 2 (0-2 weeks post-transition) versus monitoring period 1 (0-2 weeks pre-transition)

    Time frame: [0-2 weeks post-transition] vs [0-2 weeks pre-transition]

    Sleep will be monitored using actigraphy sensors for a subset of participants. There will be three sleep monitoring periods: 0-2 weeks before transition from ritonavir-boosted lopinavir- to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (period 1), 0-2 weeks after transition, and 2-4 weeks after transition). We will conduct a before-after analysis.

  4. Sleep fragmentation

    Time frame: [2-4 weeks post-transition] vs [0-2 weeks pre-transition], and [0-2 weeks post-transition] vs [0-2 weeks pre-transition]

    Sleep will be monitored using actigraphy sensors for a subset of participants. There will be three sleep monitoring periods: 0-2 weeks before transition from ritonavir-boosted lopinavir- to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (period 1), 0-2 weeks after transition, and 2-4 weeks after transition). We will conduct a before-after analysis.

  5. Treatment satisfaction after vs before transition, assessed using the HIVTSQ status version (HIVTSQ-s)

    Time frame: 4 weeks post-transition vs at transition

    10-item scale with each item scored from 0 to 6 (overall range 0 to 60), with higher scores indicating higher treatment satisfaction. Two time points compared in a before-after analysis.

  6. Gastrointestinal symptoms after vs before transition, assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale adapted for protease inhibitors (GSRS-PI)

    Time frame: 4 weeks post-transition vs at transition

    13-item scale with each item scored from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater discomfort. Two time points compared in a before-after analysis.

  7. Depressive symptoms after vs before transition, assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC)

    Time frame: 4 weeks post-transition vs at transition

    20-item scale with each item scored from 0 to 3 (overall range 0 to 60), with higher scores indicating higher depressive symptoms. Two time points compared in a before-after analysis.

  8. Sleep outcomes after vs before transition, assessed using the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) or Adolescent Sleep Habits Questionnaire (ASHQ)

    Time frame: 4 weeks post-transition vs at transition

    33-item scale (2 items used in two subscales) with each item scored from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating more sleep problems. Two time points compared in a before-after analysis.

  9. Health-related quality of life after vs before transition, assessed using the KINDL questionnaire

    Time frame: 4 weeks post-transition vs at transition

    24-item scale with each item scored from 1 to five, with higher scores indicating higher health-related quality of life

Other outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants with drug resistance among participants with viraemia while taking dolutegravir

    Time frame: until 24 months after transition

    Classified Stanford HIV drug resistance database (susceptible, potential low-level resistance, low-level resistance, intermediate resistance, high-level resistance) referring to each drug in the current ART regimen

  2. Impact of drug resistance at time of transition on subsequent viral suppression

    Time frame: until 24 months after transition

    Assessment whether resistance at transition predicts subsequent routinely assessed viral load outcomes

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • Baylor College of Medicine Children's Foundation
  • Baylor International Pediatric AIDS Initiative
  • Lesotho Ministry of Health
  • University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
  • University of Basel
  • University of Zurich

Registry information

Official study title

Tolerability of Lopinavir Versus Dolutegravir for Children and Adolescents Living With HIV (LoDoCA): a Prospective Cohort Study

Acronym: LoDoCA

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Jun 22, 2022
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.