Pfizer
New York, 10017, United States
NCT Number: NCT04682587
To assess how dose reductions or treatment interruptions related to axitinib can be implemented to manage and resolve adverse events occurring among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line axitinib in combination with avelumab or pembrolizumab
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
New York, 10017, United States
The specific objectives of the study are as follows:
Describe incident adverse events (AEs) experienced among patients with advanced RCC who received first-line axitinib in combination with immuno-oncology (IO) therapies.
Among patients with advanced RCC who developed incident AEs while receiving first line axitinib in combination with IO therapies, characterize and describe management strategies for AEs, stratified by type and seriousness of AEs.
Assess the frequency of and time to AE resolution (from AE onset and initiation of management strategy, separately) among patients with advanced RCC who developed incident AEs while receiving first-line axitinib in combination with IO therapies according to different management strategies implemented, stratified further by type and seriousness of AEs, as allowed by sample size.
The above objectives will also be conducted for repeated AEs of the same type
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Physicians meeting the following criteria will be invited to participate in the chart review study:
Eligible oncologists will be asked to select up to three patients meeting the following criteria for inclusion in the chart review study:
Exclusion criteria
There are no exclusion criteria for this study
Inlyta, axitinib
Avelumab, Bavencio
Pembrolizumab, Keytruda
Time frame: Observation period of maximum up to 7.1 months; duration of this retrospective study was approximately 1.5 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship to it.Index date was defined as the initiation of first-line axitinib (used in combination with IO therapy) on or after May 2019, which marked FDA approval of axitinib in combination with avelumab for first-line advanced RCC treatment. Observation period was time from index date to the earliest of initiation of a second line therapy, death, loss to follow-up, or date of chart abstraction. Data, index date, and observation period were on the basis of data extracted from medical charts of participants.
Time frame: 6 months
AE was considered serious when it: resulted in death, life-threatening, requires in-participant hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was an important medical event that may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. Index date was defined as the initiation of first-line axitinib (used in combination with IO therapy) on or after May 2019, which marked FDA approval of axitinib in combination with avelumab for first-line advanced RCC treatment. Observation period was time from index date to the earliest of initiation of a second line therapy, death, loss to follow-up, or date of chart abstraction. Data, index date, and observation period were on the basis of data extracted from medical charts of participants.
Time frame: Observation period of maximum up to 7.1 months; duration of this retrospective study was approximately 1.5 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study medication without regard to possibility of causal relationship to it. In this outcome measure time from index date to occurrence of incidence of any AE is reported. Index date was defined as the initiation of first-line axitinib (used in combination with IO therapy) on or after May 2019, which marked FDA approval of axitinib in combination with avelumab for first-line advanced RCC treatment. Observation period was time from index date to the earliest of initiation of a second line therapy, death, loss to follow-up, or date of chart abstraction. Data, index date, and observation period were on the basis of data extracted from medical charts of participants.
Time frame: Observation period of maximum up to 7.1 months; duration of this retrospective study was approximately 1.5 months
The time to resolution from AE onset and from initiation of management strategy was calculated for all AEs experienced including repeated AEs. The time to resolution of AE (from the onset of AE and from the initiation of management strategies) was separately estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis; median time to event will be reported. Index date was defined as the initiation of first-line axitinib (used in combination with IO therapy) on or after May 2019, which marked FDA approval of axitinib in combination with avelumab for first-line advanced RCC treatment. Observation period was time from index date to the earliest of initiation of a second line therapy, death, loss to follow-up, or date of chart abstraction. Data, index date, and observation period were on the basis of data extracted from medical charts of participants.
Time frame: Observation period of maximum up to 7.1 months; duration of this retrospective study was approximately 1.5 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship with the study treatment. Index date was defined as the initiation of first-line axitinib (used in combination with IO therapy) on or after May 2019, which marked FDA approval of axitinib in combination with avelumab for first-line advanced RCC treatment. Observation period was time from index date to the earliest of initiation of a second line therapy, death, loss to follow-up, or date of chart abstraction. Data, index date, and observation period were on the basis of data extracted from medical charts of participants.
Time frame: Observation period of maximum up to 7.1 months; duration of this retrospective study was approximately 1.5 month
Duration of treatment interruption was calculated as the total days of treatment interruption. Index date was defined as the initiation of first-line axitinib (used in combination with IO therapy) on or after May 2019, which marked FDA approval of axitinib in combination with avelumab for first-line advanced RCC treatment. Observation period was time from index date to the earliest of initiation of a second line therapy, death, loss to follow-up, or date of chart abstraction. Data, index date, and observation period were on the basis of data extracted from medical charts of participants.
Time frame: Observation period of maximum up to 7.1 months; duration of this retrospective study was approximately 1.5 months
Maximum axitinib dose reduction was calculated as the difference between axitinib dose at AE onset and the minimum axitinib dose recorded between the date of AE onset and either the date of AE resolution (if the AE had a reported resolution date) or the end of follow up (if the AE did not have a reported resolution date).Index date was defined as the initiation of first-line axitinib (used in combination with IO therapy) on or after May 2019, which marked FDA approval of axitinib in combination with avelumab for first-line advanced RCC treatment. Observation period was time from index date to the earliest of initiation of a second line therapy, death, loss to follow-up, or date of chart abstraction. Data, index date, and observation period were on the basis of data extracted from medical charts of participants.
Pfizer
Industry
A Panel-Based Chart Review Study to Examine the Effects of Axitinib Dose Reduction and Interruption for Adverse Event Management Among Patients Receiving First-Line Axitinib in Combination With Immune-Oncology Drugs for the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02718066
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02009449
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05256472
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03294083
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial Details