Insulin Patch Pump System
Devicepatients who enrolled in this group use the Insulin Patch Pump System
NCT Number: NCT07403565
Patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either the test group or the control group for short-time intensive insulin therapy in inpatient setting. The test group will receive treatment with the Insulin Patch Pump System, while the control group will be treated with the Medtronic MMT-1805 insulin pump (MiniMed 700). The treatment period will last 7 days, during which blood glucose monitoring will be conducted in both groups.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
The efficacy and safety of the Insulin Patch Pump System for insulin infusion therapy in patients with diabetes are evaluated by comparing it with the MMT-1805 insulin pump (MiniMed 700). This clinical trial employs a prospective, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, multicenter, non-inferiority design.
On Day 0 (baseline), all participants maintain their pre-existing antidiabetic regimens to collect baseline glucose data. From Day 1 to Day 7, patients undergo a 7-day course of intensive insulin pump therapy. The test group receives treatment with the Insulin Patch Pump System, while the control group is treated with the Medtronic MMT-1805 insulin pump (MiniMed 700). During the intervention, participants receive standardized diabetic hospital meals and perform eight-point daily capillary blood glucose (BG) monitoring. Concurrently, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is maintained. Glycated albumin (GA) levels are assessed at baseline (Day 0) and post-treatment (Day 8).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
patients who enrolled in this group use the Insulin Patch Pump System
patients who enrolled in this group use Minimed 700
Time frame: Compare the difference in the change of mean blood glucose from baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 between the two groups
Time frame: Compare the difference in the change of mean preprandial blood glucose from baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 between the two groups
Time frame: Compare the difference in the change of mean 2-hour postprandial blood glucose from baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 between the two groups
Time frame: Compare the difference in the change of postprandial glucose excursion (PPGE) from baseline (Day 0) to Day 7 between the two groups.
Time frame: Compare the difference in TIR between the two groups during the treatment period (Day 1 to Day 7).
Time frame: Compare the difference in glucose coefficient of variation between the two groups during the treatment period (Day 1 to Day 7).
Time frame: Compare the difference in changes in glycated albumin (GA) between the two groups from Day 0 to Day 8
Time frame: Compare the difference in TAR between the two groups during the treatment period (Day 1 to Day 7)
Time frame: Compare the difference in TBR between the two groups during the treatment period (Day 1 to Day 7)
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 7
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 7
Time frame: Day 1 to Day 7
Time frame: Day 0 to Day 7
Time frame: Day 8
After completing the training, the investigators administered treatment using the device in accordance with the Instructions for Use. Upon completion of treatment, the investigators rated the device's performance across 11 dimensions, including Ease of device assembly/Ease of parameter configuration/Ease of consumable replacement/Product sealing integrity/Infusion smoothness/Adhesion stability/Battery life/Alarm reliability/Failure-free operation/User interface smoothness/Bluetooth Function and Connection Stability. Each item was scored on a 3-point scale (3 = excellent, 2 = satisfactory, 1 = poor), with higher scores indicating better performance.
Time frame: Day 8
After treatment completion, subjects rated their satisfaction with the device's ease of use and operation across 5 dimensions, including Implantation Pain Satisfaction/Comfortable Satisfaction/Convenient Satisfaction/Blood Glucose Management Satisfaction/Treatment Satisfaction. Each item was scored on a 3-point scale (3 = excellent, 2 = satisfactory, 1 = poor), with higher scores indicating a more favorable outcome.
Suzhou Hechun Medical Technology Co., Ltd.
Industry
To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Insulin Patch Pump System in Patients With Diabetes: A Prospective, Randomized, Positive Parallel Controlled, Open-label, Multicenter, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05229718
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05253521
Autoimmune Diseases, Brain Diseases
Markham, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04698122
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus
Perugia, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT01094899
Autoimmune Diseases, Bone Diseases
Paris, France
View Trial Details