Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03242902

To Decrease Fatigue With Light Therapy

Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and distressing long-term complaints reported by (non-) Hodgkin survivors. The SPARKLE study will test the efficacy of two intensities of light therapy on cancer related fatigue. Additionally, it explores possible working mechanisms of light therapy on CRF including improvements in sleep quality, psychosocial variables (depression, anxiety, cognitive complaints, and quality of life), and changes in biological circadian rhythms.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Rationale: Cancer related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most prevalent and distressing long-term complaints reported by (non-)Hodgkin survivors. So far, there is no standard treatment. Some non-pharmacological interventions have shown large effects but show limitations as well, e.g. they are labor intensive. A novel and promising treatment for CRF is exposure to bright white light (BWL) therapy. This low-cost intervention is easy to deliver and has a low burden for professionals as well as for patients.

Objective: To examine the efficacy of BWL therapy as an intervention for CRF. As a secondary aim, this study will explore possible working mechanisms including changes in sleep quality, psychological variables, biological circadian rhythms, sleep-wake cycles, inflammation markers and genotype.

Study design: A multicenter randomized controlled trial will invite participants and allocate them to either a light intensity 1 condition (n=80) or a light intensity 2 condition (n=80). The longitudinal design will include four measurement points: baseline, mid-intervention, post-intervention, and at 3 and 9 months follow-up.

Study population: Hodgkin and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) survivors fulfilling the clinical criteria of CRF and a survivorship of ≥ 3 years will be invited. Fatigue should not be attributable to a clear somatic cause or treatment for secondary cancer in the past year. Moreover, 25 Hodgkin survivors without CRF will be recruited to explore the association between circadian rhythms and CRF.

Intervention: The light intervention includes exposure to light for 30 minutes within the first half hour after awakening during 3,5 weeks.

Main study parameters/endpoints: The main study parameter in this study is the change in CRF from baseline to post-intervention and at 3 and 9 months follow-up. This will be assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participation in this study includes completion of a light intervention for 3,5 weeks (30 min each day) and 2 visits (1h) to the treating hospital pre- and post-intervention. The visits aim to provide instructions and equipment and to collect two blood samples. Additionally, 5 saliva samples will be collected by the participant at home pre- and post-intervention. Moreover, participants complete questionnaires (30 min, 4 times) and wear an accelerometer (10d, 4 times and during light therapy) to objectively measure sleep quality and activity. Risks of the light intervention are limited, although there are few known reports of agitation, headache and nausea during the first days of light exposure. Benefits are the use of an easy to administer treatment for one of the most distressing symptoms that participants report.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • A history of Hodgkin or DLBCL with a survivorship of ≥ 3 years.
  • The presence of moderate to severe fatigue symptoms since diagnosis of or treatment for Hodgkin lymphoma or DLBCL.

Exclusion criteria

  • Fatigue is explained by a somatic factor as defined in the guidelines of chronic fatigue syndrome of the Dutch internists association (NIV). When a somatic cause for fatigue is resolved by stable medication use ≥ 6 months, patients can be included in the current trial.
  • Pregnancy (until 3 months postnatal) or women who provide breast feeding
  • Extensive surgical operations in the past 3 months.
  • Current diagnosis of a psychiatric disorder (e.g. personality disorders, psychosis, bipolar disorder) which would limit participation.
  • Diagnosis of and treatment for a secondary malignancy in the past 12 months.
  • Presence of photophobia (abnormal intolerance to visual perception of light) or another eye disease that shows symptoms of photophobia (e.g. aniridia, retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma).
  • Current or previous use of light therapy for more than 1 week.
  • Current employment in shift work.
  • Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language.

Treatment and study plan

Light therapy intensity 1

Device

Exposure to white light (10.000 lux) in the morning

Light therapy intensity 2

Device

Exposure to white light (10-20 lux) in the morning

Primary outcomes

  1. Cancer related fatigue

    Time frame: Change from baseline fatigue at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory

  2. Cancer related fatigue

    Time frame: Change from baseline fatigue at 3 months after light therapy

    Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue

  3. Cancer related fatigue

    Time frame: Change from baseline fatigue at 9 months after light therapy

    Fatigue is assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subjective sleep quality

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Subjective sleep quality is assessed with the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index

  2. Subjective sleep quality

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at 3 months after light therapy

    Subjective sleep quality is assessed with the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index

  3. Subjective sleep quality

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective sleep quality at 9 months after light therapy

    Subjective sleep quality is assessed with the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index

  4. Objective sleep quality

    Time frame: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Objective sleep quality data is assessed by wearing an accelerometer for 10 days

  5. Objective sleep quality

    Time frame: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at 3 months after light therapy

    Objective sleep quality data is assessed by wearing an accelerometer for 10 days

  6. Objective sleep quality

    Time frame: Change from baseline objective sleep quality at 9 months after light therapy

    Objective sleep quality data is assessed by wearing an accelerometer for 10 days

  7. Depression

    Time frame: Change from baseline depression at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Depression is assessed with the Center for Epidemiological Studies - depression scale

  8. Depression

    Time frame: Change from baseline depression at 3 months after light therapy

    Depression is assessed with the Center for Epidemiological Studies - depression scale

  9. Depression

    Time frame: Change from baseline depression at 9 months after light therapy

    Depression is assessed with the Center for Epidemiological Studies - depression scale

  10. Anxiety

    Time frame: Change from baseline anxiety at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Anxiety is assessed with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 items

  11. Anxiety

    Time frame: Change from baseline anxiety at 3 months after light therapy

    Anxiety is assessed with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 items

  12. Anxiety

    Time frame: Change from baseline anxiety at 9 months after light therapy

    Anxiety is assessed with the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 items

  13. Quality of life

    Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Quality of life is assessed with the Medical Outcome studies short form (SF-36)

  14. Quality of life

    Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 3 months after light therapy

    Quality of life is assessed with the Medical Outcome studies short form (SF-36)

  15. Quality of life

    Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 9 months after light therapy

    Quality of life is assessed with the Medical Outcome studies short form (SF-36)

  16. Subjective cognitive complaints

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the Medical Outcomes Studies Cognitive functioning.

  17. Subjective cognitive complaints

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory

  18. Subjective cognitive complaints

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 3 months after light therapy

    Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the Medical Outcomes Studies Cognitive functioning

  19. Subjective cognitive complaints

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 3 months after light therapy

    Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory

  20. Subjective cognitive complaints

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 9 months after light therapy

    Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the Medical Outcomes Studies Cognitive functioning

  21. Subjective cognitive complaints

    Time frame: Change from baseline subjective cognitive complaints at 9 months after light therapy

    Subjective cognitive complaints assessed with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory

  22. Objective cognitive complaints - alertness and sustained attention

    Time frame: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Objective cognitive complaints are assessed with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task.

  23. Objective cognitive complaints - long-term memory

    Time frame: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Objective cognitive complaints are assessed with the 15 words test.

  24. Objective cognitive complaints - short-term memory

    Time frame: Change from baseline objective cognitive complaints at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Objective cognitive complaints are assessed with the digit span task.

  25. Cancer worries

    Time frame: Change from baseline cancer worries at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Cancer worries is assessed with the Cancer Worry scale

  26. Cancer worries

    Time frame: Change from baseline cancer worries at 3 months after light therapy

    Cancer worries is assessed with the Cancer Worry scale

  27. Cancer worries

    Time frame: Change from baseline cancer worries at 9 months after light therapy

    Cancer worries is assessed with the Cancer Worry scale

  28. Fatigue catastrophizing

    Time frame: Baseline

    Fatigue catastrophizing is assessed with the Fatigue catastrophizing scale

  29. Self-efficacy

    Time frame: Baseline

    Self-efficacy is assessed with the Self-efficacy Scale 28

  30. Circadian rhythms of cortisol and melatonin

    Time frame: Change from baseline circadian rhythms at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Circadian rhythms of cortisol and melatonin will be determined from saliva samples

  31. Biomarkers of inflammation and genotype

    Time frame: Change from baseline levels of biomarkers at end of 3,5 weeks light therapy

    Biomarkers of inflammation (hsIL-6, sTNF-RII, IL-1RA, hsCRP, vitamin D) and genotype will be determined from blood samples

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The Netherlands Cancer Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • Dutch Cancer Society

Registry information

Official study title

Improving Sleep Quality, Psychosocial Functioning, and Cancer Related Fatigue With Light Therapy

Acronym: SPARKLE

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Aug 8, 2017
Registry last updated
Sep 1, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.