Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05117684

To Compare "Balloon Occluded Thrombolysis" With "Conventional Catheter Directed Thrombolysis" in Thrombotically Occluded DIPSS Stent in Patients of Budd- Chiari Syndrome.

DIPSS has become a widely accepted treatment for complications of portal hypertension. Shunt or hepatic vein stenosis are common short and mid term complications of the procedure. When identified early, shunt stenosis or occlusion may be treated before recurrence of the symptoms for which DIPSS was done at the first place. Present day endovascular DIPSS revision techniques have significantly improved the primary assisted patency rates.

The purpose of this study is to understand the newer technique of Combined balloon occlusion thrombolysis and intra stent balloon sweeping being practiced at our institute and compare it with the widely used conventional thrombolytic methods.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070, India

About this study

Primary objective:

  • To study the outcome of combined technique of Balloon occluded thrombolysis, Balloon sweeping and maceration of thrombus in Blocked DIPSS stent and compare it with Conventional catheter directed thrombolysis and angioplasty.

Secondary objective:

  • Study DIPSS stent patency and re-occlusion rates at 1 month followup

Methodology:

Study population: Patients with Budd -Chiari syndrome who underwent DIPSS revision till February 2021

Study design: Single center retrospective cohort study

Study period: 1year

Sample size: All eligible patients according to inclusion and exclusion criteria who underwent TIPS/DIPS revision will be included in thestudy.

Intervention: DIPSS Revision

Monitoring andassessment:

The following parameters to be evaluated over a period at least 1 month after DIPSS revision and compare with pre revisionvalues

Clinical parameters:

Status of ascites Urine output Recurrence of UGI/LGI bleed

Laboratory parameters:

ALBI Score,LFT, KFT

DOPPLER PARAMETERS:

Mid stent velocity, velocity at hepatic venous end Main portal vein velocity Direction of flow in intrahepatic portal vein branches

Stopping rule: Not applicable.

Expected outcome of the project: Balloon Occluded thrombolytic infusion alongwith intratsent balloon sweeping gives faster and better patency as compared to conventional pharmaco-mechanicalthrombolytic methods

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of Budd- Chiari syndrome who underwent DIPSS revision for blocked stent till February 2021

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who underwent DIPSS revision more than one time using both the techniques were excluded.
  • Failure to cannulate existing shunt.

Treatment and study plan

Novel

Procedure

Balloon- Occlusion thrombolysis was done in adjunct to thrombus maceration, balloon sweeping and thrombosuction.

Conventional

Procedure

Continuous catheter directed thrombolysis (Continuous urokinase infusion) was done along with thrombus maceration, balloon sweeping and thrombosuction.

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare the rate of re-stenting between the two groups

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Compare the mean total dose of thrombolytic drug administered between the two groups

    Time frame: Day 0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Study DIPSS stent patency and re-occlusion rates at 1 month followup.

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. To compare the length of hospital stay between two groups

    Time frame: 1 month

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Nov 11, 2021
Registry last updated
Dec 27, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.