Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06358391

To Compare and Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety Between TS-RF System and BRK Transseptal Needles Used for Transseptal Puncture for Left Atrial Access.

The purpose of this study is to compare and assess efficacy and safety between the study device "TS-RF system consisting of a electrosurgical system, general-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a electrosurgical system electrode, hand-controlled, general-purpose, single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and the control device "needle, puncture, single-use (BRK Transseptal needle)", both of which are used for the transseptal puncture performed to enable left atrial access for the treatment of symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis and then to demonstrate that the study device is non-inferior to the control device.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Bucheon Sejong Hospital

Bucheon-si, South Korea

Location status: Recruiting

About this study

The efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) needles in transseptal puncture have been well established through several comparative clinical studies. In foreign countries, RF needles have already been used for transseptal puncture for more than 20 years since the FDA approval of the first RF Needle. However, in Korea, despite the fact that it has been approximately 30 years since the initiation of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the treatment of arrhythmia, only the conventional mechanical needles have still been available after authorization for transseptal puncture that is the key for the treatment of cardiac disorders such as mitral stenosis as well as a part of RFCA for the treatment of arrhythmia.

Therefore, this study aims to compare and assess efficacy and safety between the study device "TS-RF system consisting of a electrosurgical system, general-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a electrosurgical system electrode, hand-controlled, general-purpose, single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and the control device "needle, puncture, single-use (BRK Transseptal needle)", both of which are used for the transseptal puncture performed to enable left atrial access for the treatment of symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis, and then to demonstrate that the study device is non-inferior to the control device.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Diagnosed with one of the following cardiac disorders as shown in the medical record:

[Symptomatic arrhythmia]

  • "Atrial fibrillation" diagnostics (including paroxysmal, persistent, long-standing persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation)
  • Diagnostic criteria: atrial fibrillation lasting ≥ 30 seconds as a result of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) or single-lead ECG
  • ECG feature: irregular R-R interval, lack of visible P waves, irregular atrial activation
  • Symptoms: fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, chest discomfort, sleep disorders, mental stress
  • Type:
  • Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (stopping within 48 hours without any treatment; restoring the sinus rhythm with cardioversion within 7 days)
  • Persistent atrial fibrillation (persisting for ≥ 7 days; including sinus rhythm restoration with direct-current cardioversion (DCC) or pharmacological cardioversion after the persistence)
  • Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (persisting for ≥ 1 year; including cases requiring cardioversion)
  • Permanent atrial fibrillation (The patient and healthcare provider accept atrial fibrillation and do not consider cardioversion; if cardioversion is considered, the atrial fibrillation is reclassified as long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation)
  • "Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia" diagnostics

= Clinical feature: The heart beats regularly 150 to 200 times per minute; the start and end of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia are clearly recognizable; these occur unexpectedly and stop abruptly.

  • "Ectopic Atrial Rhythm Tachycardia" diagnostics

= Clinical feature: Heart rhythm of less than 250 beats per minute; morphologic difference from P waves in the sinus rhythm; P waves that precede QRS waves are identifiable.

  • "Ventricular Tachycardia" diagnostics = Clinical feature: Wide QRS waves appear in succession with a rapid ventricular rate of ≥ 100 beats per minute; the patients is diagnosed with persistent ventricular tachycardia if tachycardia persists for ≥ 30 seconds but with non-persistent ventricular tachycardia if not applicable.
  • "Arrhythmia requiring left atrial access, including left atrial appendage occlusion, in the left atrium" diagnostics = Clinical feature: moderate or higher risk of stroke, risk of bleeding, or contraindication to anticoagulation therapy

[Symptomatic mitral stenosis]

-"Mitral Stenosis requiring percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty through left atrial access" diagnostics

  • Diagnostic criteria: confirmation of mitral stenosis with echocardiography and assessment of severity
  • Symptoms: dyspnea; shortness of breath even at rest or inability to sleep in a supine position if dyspnea worsens; may accompanied by coughing, sputum, and chest pain.
  • Understood this clinical study and voluntarily signed the informed consent form (ICF)1

Exclusion criteria

[For symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis] If any of the following applies, you cannot participate in this clinical trial.1,26,37,45,46

  • Patients with significant congenital heart defects, such as atrial septal defect or pulmonary vein (PV) abnormalities (excluding patent foramen ovale (PFO)).
  • Thrombus in the left atrium
  • Atrial fibrillation to reversible causes (e.g. hyperthyroidism, thoracic surgery)
  • Known or suspected left atrial myxoma.
  • Unstable angina.
  • Pre-existing hemidiaphragmatic paralysis
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation or radiocontrast materials
  • liver disease (including active hepatitis) and kidney disease.
  • Cerebral ischemic event (strokes or TIAs) during the six-month interval preceding the consent date
  • Malignant tumors or hematological diseases or life expectancy of less than one (1) year.
  • Currently participating or anticipated to participate in any other clinical trial of a drug, device or biologic that has the potential to interfere with the results of this study
  • Unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up
  • A pregnant woman, a woman planning on becoming pregnant, or a lactating woman.
  • Ineligible for study participation in the judgment of the investigator.

Treatment and study plan

TS-RF Transseptal Needle

Device

Apply radiofrequency energy to the electrode tip via the TS-RF Generator and puncture the atrial septum

BRK Transseptal Needle

Device

Cross and puncture the atrial septum with the BRK Transseptal Needle

Primary outcomes

  1. First-pass TSP Success Rate (percent)

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    Probability that the needle crosses from the superior vena cava to the fossa ovalis and its left atrial access is identified at a time by fluoroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE).

Secondary outcomes

  1. TSP Time (Second)

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    Time from the point where the needle crosses from the superior vena cava to the fossa ovalis to the point where its left atrial access is identified by fluoroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE).

  2. Fluoroscopy Time (Second) for TSP

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    Time from the point where invasive vascular monitoring is initiated with fluoroscopy following the femoral venous puncture and then the needle inserted into the femoral vein is visible on the fluoroscope's fluorescent screen to the point where the needle tip's left atrial access after TSP is identified.

  3. Needle cross-over between the study and control groups

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    Perform TSP by switching the needle from the BRK needle in the control group to the TS-RF needle in the study group, or from the TS-RF needle in the study group to the BRK needle in the control group. Collect the data based on the recorded videos and procedure record sheets. (Number of subjects who switched needles and percentage in each group)

  4. Intra-TSP procedural device-associated complications

    Time frame: Day of procedure

    Collect and total the numbers of intra-TSP procedural device-associated complications for each group based on the procedure record sheets and then calculate and compare the group-specific incidence rates (percent).

  5. Changes in patient's quality of life

    Time frame: before the procedure (baseline) and at 2 weeks after the procedure.

    Check the improvement in patient's quality of life by measuring the degree of discomfort due to symptomatic arrhythmia or mitral stenosis before the procedure (baseline) and at 2 weeks after the procedure.

    Calculate and compare group-specific mean changes in EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS before the procedure (baseline) and at the follow-up visit 2 weeks after the procedure.

    It consists of 5 multiple-choice questions asking about current health status and 1 question (visual analogue scale, VAS) that displays subjective health level (0 to 100 points) in the form of a thermometer.

  6. Complications

    Time frame: for 2 weeks after the procedure

    Check the complications collected during the hospitalization period within 7 days immediately after the procedure and at the follow-up visit 2 weeks after the procedure, including the following two durations:.

    • From the end of TSP to the end of hospitalization within 7 days thereafter
    • From the discharge to the follow-up visit at 2 weeks after TSP

Other outcomes

  1. Intra-TSP procedural Adverse Events

    Time frame: During procedure

    Types and numbers of adverse events, including all complications that occurred during TSP, such as perforations, damages and bleedings in tissues other than the atrial septum due to needles, sheaths, dilators, and other catheters, replacement with the same needle product, and deterioration of patient's vital signs.

  2. Overall Adverse Events

    Time frame: for 2 weeks after the procedure

    Types and numbers of all adverse events including all complications occurring from the time of subject enrollment to the end of follow-up visit at 2 weeks after TSP, including the following three durations:

    • From the subject enrollment to the end of TSP
    • From the end of TSP to the end of hospitalization within 7 days thereafter
    • From the discharge to the follow-up visit at 2 weeks after TSP

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Eunji shin

CONTACT

[email protected]

+82-31-816-3546 ext. 603

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Starmed

Industry

Collaborators

  • Helptrial

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Single-blind, Non-inferiority Confirmatory Study Designed to Compare and Assess Efficacy and Safety Between "TS-RF System Consisting of a Electrosurgical System, General-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a Electrosurgical System Electrode, Hand-controlled, General-purpose, Single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and "Needle, Puncture, Single-use (BRK Transseptal Needle)", Both of Which Are Used for the Transseptal Puncture Performed to Enable Left Atrial Access for the Treatment of Symptomatic Arrhythmia and Mitral Stenosis

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Apr 10, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.