Bucheon Sejong Hospital
Bucheon-si, South Korea
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06358391
The purpose of this study is to compare and assess efficacy and safety between the study device "TS-RF system consisting of a electrosurgical system, general-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a electrosurgical system electrode, hand-controlled, general-purpose, single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and the control device "needle, puncture, single-use (BRK Transseptal needle)", both of which are used for the transseptal puncture performed to enable left atrial access for the treatment of symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis and then to demonstrate that the study device is non-inferior to the control device.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bucheon-si, South Korea
Location status: Recruiting
The efficacy and safety of radiofrequency (RF) needles in transseptal puncture have been well established through several comparative clinical studies. In foreign countries, RF needles have already been used for transseptal puncture for more than 20 years since the FDA approval of the first RF Needle. However, in Korea, despite the fact that it has been approximately 30 years since the initiation of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for the treatment of arrhythmia, only the conventional mechanical needles have still been available after authorization for transseptal puncture that is the key for the treatment of cardiac disorders such as mitral stenosis as well as a part of RFCA for the treatment of arrhythmia.
Therefore, this study aims to compare and assess efficacy and safety between the study device "TS-RF system consisting of a electrosurgical system, general-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a electrosurgical system electrode, hand-controlled, general-purpose, single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and the control device "needle, puncture, single-use (BRK Transseptal needle)", both of which are used for the transseptal puncture performed to enable left atrial access for the treatment of symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis, and then to demonstrate that the study device is non-inferior to the control device.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
[Symptomatic arrhythmia]
= Clinical feature: The heart beats regularly 150 to 200 times per minute; the start and end of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia are clearly recognizable; these occur unexpectedly and stop abruptly.
= Clinical feature: Heart rhythm of less than 250 beats per minute; morphologic difference from P waves in the sinus rhythm; P waves that precede QRS waves are identifiable.
[Symptomatic mitral stenosis]
-"Mitral Stenosis requiring percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty through left atrial access" diagnostics
Exclusion criteria
[For symptomatic arrhythmia and mitral stenosis] If any of the following applies, you cannot participate in this clinical trial.1,26,37,45,46
Apply radiofrequency energy to the electrode tip via the TS-RF Generator and puncture the atrial septum
Cross and puncture the atrial septum with the BRK Transseptal Needle
Time frame: Day of procedure
Probability that the needle crosses from the superior vena cava to the fossa ovalis and its left atrial access is identified at a time by fluoroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE).
Time frame: Day of procedure
Time from the point where the needle crosses from the superior vena cava to the fossa ovalis to the point where its left atrial access is identified by fluoroscopy, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE).
Time frame: Day of procedure
Time from the point where invasive vascular monitoring is initiated with fluoroscopy following the femoral venous puncture and then the needle inserted into the femoral vein is visible on the fluoroscope's fluorescent screen to the point where the needle tip's left atrial access after TSP is identified.
Time frame: Day of procedure
Perform TSP by switching the needle from the BRK needle in the control group to the TS-RF needle in the study group, or from the TS-RF needle in the study group to the BRK needle in the control group. Collect the data based on the recorded videos and procedure record sheets. (Number of subjects who switched needles and percentage in each group)
Time frame: Day of procedure
Collect and total the numbers of intra-TSP procedural device-associated complications for each group based on the procedure record sheets and then calculate and compare the group-specific incidence rates (percent).
Time frame: before the procedure (baseline) and at 2 weeks after the procedure.
Check the improvement in patient's quality of life by measuring the degree of discomfort due to symptomatic arrhythmia or mitral stenosis before the procedure (baseline) and at 2 weeks after the procedure.
Calculate and compare group-specific mean changes in EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS before the procedure (baseline) and at the follow-up visit 2 weeks after the procedure.
It consists of 5 multiple-choice questions asking about current health status and 1 question (visual analogue scale, VAS) that displays subjective health level (0 to 100 points) in the form of a thermometer.
Time frame: for 2 weeks after the procedure
Check the complications collected during the hospitalization period within 7 days immediately after the procedure and at the follow-up visit 2 weeks after the procedure, including the following two durations:.
Time frame: During procedure
Types and numbers of adverse events, including all complications that occurred during TSP, such as perforations, damages and bleedings in tissues other than the atrial septum due to needles, sheaths, dilators, and other catheters, replacement with the same needle product, and deterioration of patient's vital signs.
Time frame: for 2 weeks after the procedure
Types and numbers of all adverse events including all complications occurring from the time of subject enrollment to the end of follow-up visit at 2 weeks after TSP, including the following three durations:
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Starmed
Industry
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Single-blind, Non-inferiority Confirmatory Study Designed to Compare and Assess Efficacy and Safety Between "TS-RF System Consisting of a Electrosurgical System, General-purpose (TS-RF Generator) and a Electrosurgical System Electrode, Hand-controlled, General-purpose, Single-use (TS-RF Needle)" and "Needle, Puncture, Single-use (BRK Transseptal Needle)", Both of Which Are Used for the Transseptal Puncture Performed to Enable Left Atrial Access for the Treatment of Symptomatic Arrhythmia and Mitral Stenosis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05452356
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
London, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06954610
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06455644
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Foshan, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04922281
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, New York, United States
View Trial Details