Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03840239

TNT to Increase the Clinical Complete Response Rate for Distal LARC

This is a open-label, single-arm study to investigate the safety and efficacy of total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) in patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China

About this study

Standard treatment of rectal cancer is neoadjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy with radiotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision.

A new concept suggests organ preservation as an alternative to rectal excision in good responders after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to decrease surgical morbidity and increase quality of life.

The rational is the fact that 15%-20% of patients have sterilized tumours after chemoradiotherpay for locally advanced rectal cancer. As compared to capecitabine alone, oxaliplatin and more intensified chemotherapy have been shown to increase tumor regression in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation setting. Meanwhile, prolong of time interval from the end of radiotherapy to assessment of tumor response could further increase pathologic complete response rate and complete clinical response rate.

The objective of this trial is to increase the rate of clinical complete response for distal rectal cancer patients by optimizing tumour response. The investigators expect to increase chance of clinical complete response by using total neoadjuvant treatment regimen as compared to conventional chemoradiotherapy alone.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Rectal adenocarcinoma
  • cT3-4aNany or cTanyN+
  • Location ≤5 cm from the anal verge
  • No distant metastasis
  • No gastrointestinal obstruction or relieved obstruction
  • No previous surgery of the rectum, no previous chemotherapy, no previous pelvic radiation, no previous biotherapy
  • ECOG 0-1
  • Expected survival length ≥ 2 years
  • Age 18-70
  • Sufficient bone marrow, kidney and liver function
  • Effective contraception during the study
  • Patient and doctor have signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Distant metastasis
  • Chronic intestinal inflammation and/or bowel obstruction
  • Contra indication for chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
  • Previous pelvic radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Severe renal, hepatic insufficiency (serum creatinine<30ml/min)
  • Peripheral neuropathy > grade 1
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
  • Certain or suspicious allergy to research drug
  • Cachexia, organ dysfunction
  • Active severe infection
  • Multiple primary cancers
  • Epileptic seizures
  • Malignant history within 5 years, except cervical carcinoma in situ or cutaneous basal cell carcinoma
  • Severe arrhythmia, cardiac dysfunction (NYHA grade III or IV )
  • Uncontollable severe hypertesion
  • Persons deprived of liberty or under guardianship
  • Impossibility for compliance to follow-up

Treatment and study plan

Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin

Drug

Drug: Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin

External Beam Radiotherapy

Radiation

External beam radiotherapy to the primary tumor, regional lymph nodes and clinical target volume

Surgery

Procedure

'Local excision' or 'Intersphincter resection' or 'Total mesorectal excision' or other surgeries

Watch and wait strategy

Other

Watch and wait strategy recommendation and discussion for cCR patients

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of clinical complete response

    Time frame: 1.5 year after diagnosis

    Rate of clinical complete response

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ratio of sphincter preservation strategy

    Time frame: 1.5 year after diagnosis

    Number of patients with sphincter preservation through Watch and wait strategy, or local excision, or intersphincter resection, or low anterior resection, etc.

  2. Rate of pathological complete response and tumor regression grade distribution

    Time frame: 1.5 year after diagnosis

    Rate of pathological complete response and tumor regression grade distribution

  3. Acute toxicity

    Time frame: Within the first course of anti-tumor treatment

    Acute toxicity according to CTCAE 5.0

  4. Rate of surgical complications

    Time frame: 1.5 year after diagnosis

    Rate of surgical complications

  5. Long-term anal function

    Time frame: 1.5 year after diagnosis

    Long-term anal function according to Wexner Continence Grading Scale

  6. Long-term toxicity grading

    Time frame: 3 year after the end of the first course of anti-tumor treatment

    Long-term toxicity grading according to CTCAE 5.0

  7. ECOG standard score

    Time frame: 1.5 year after diagnosis

    ECOG standard score

  8. 3 year disease free survival

    Time frame: 3 year after the end of the first course of anti-tumor treatment

    3 year disease free survival

  9. 5 year overall survival

    Time frame: 5 year after the end of the first course of anti-tumor treatment

    5 year overall survival

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sun Yat-sen University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Total Neoadjuvant trEatment to Increase the Clinical Complete reSponse Rate for diStal Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (TESS)

Acronym: TESS

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 15, 2019
Registry last updated
Oct 25, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.