Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04784832

TMS-based Assessment of Mental Training Effects on Motor Learning in Healthy Participants

The general purpose of this research project is to analyze the specific role of motor imagery on motor learning, assessed through corticospinal excitability measurements and behavioral data collection. This project is based on four sequences. For Sequence 1, the main objective is to examine the effect of mental training on movement speed and accuracy in a manual motor sequence task, as well as the influence of sensory feedback in immediate post-test (i.e., execution of a similar, but not identical, manual motor sequence, other manual tasks) on performance in delayed post-test. The secondary objective will be to examine corticospinal changes (i.e., amplitude of motor evoked potentials) induced by mental training, by measuring the amplitude of motor evoked potentials before and after mental training. For Sequence 2, the main objective is to examine the impact of a motor disturbance induced by a robotic arm at different intervals during the motor imagery process. The secondary objective will be to examine the corticospinal changes (i.e. amplitude of evoked motor potentials) induced by mental training as a function of the applied perturbations, before and after perturbation. For Sequence 3, the main objective will be to examine the influence of neuroplasticity on the quality of mental training. More specifically, the investigators will study the links between brain plasticity and motor learning through mental training. The secondary objective will be to examine the corticospinal changes (i.e. amplitude of evoked motor potentials) induced by mental training at different levels of the neuromuscular system (cortical, cervicomedullar, peripheral) after a training period. For Sequence 4, the main objective will be to examine the effect of short-term arm-immobilization of on the retention of motor learning induced by mental training. The secondary objective will be to examine the corticospinal changes (i.e., amplitude of motor evoked potentials) induced by of short-term arm-immobilization, or by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), on motor learning. The results of this fundamental research project will allow a better understanding of neurophysiological and behavioral mechanisms that underlie motor learning through motor imagery. The results will allow to efficiently consider inter-individual specificities and will thus open up to clinical research perspectives, towards the establishment of adapted motor rehabilitation protocols.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

INSERM - U1093 Cognition, Action, and Sensorimotor Plasticity

Dijon, France

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Florent Lebon, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 3 80 39 67 49

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female between 18 and 60 years old
  • Having given written informed consent
  • Affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

  • History of psychiatric illness (declarative)
  • Person under guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice
  • Neurological problem that could bias the results of the study (declarative)
  • Personal or family history of epilepsy
  • Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Person hospitalized without consent and not subject to legal protection, and person admitted to a health or social institution for purposes other than that of the research
  • Person subject to an exclusion period for another research
  • Pregnant women or women of childbearing age not using known contraception
  • Breastfeeding women
  • Person on medication that could influence neurophysiological measures (neuroleptics, anxiolytics, antidepressants)
  • Person carrying :
  • pacemaker or other device that could interfere with the magnetic field
  • Implants (mechanical or electronic: cochlear implants, neural or cardiac pacemakers, infusion pumps, magnetic aneurysm clips, etc.)
  • Metallic foreign bodies in the eye or nervous system
  • Metallic objects (tattoos, piercings, etc.)

Treatment and study plan

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Device

Magnetic stimulation of the cortex

Other names: TMS

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

Device

Electric stimulation of the nerves

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Device

Electric stimulation of the cortex

Other names: tDCS

Paired Associative Stimulation

Device

Combined magnetic and electric stimulation of cortex and nerve, respectively

Other names: PAS

Wrist

Device

Short-term immobilization of the arm

Robotic Arm

Device

External perturbation of force field induced by robotic arm

Cervicomedullar stimulation

Device

Electric stimulation of the muscle

Physical training

Other

Training to perform the task by actually doing the task

Mental training

Other

Training to perform the task by imaging doing the task

Primary outcomes

  1. Evolution of movement speed - Sequence 1

    Time frame: Each day in Sequence 1 (Sequence 1 is 11 days)

    The duration of performed movement sequences

  2. Evolution of movement accuracy - Sequence 1

    Time frame: Each day in Sequence 1 (Sequence 1 is 11 days)

    The accuracy of performed movement sequences (i.e., the correspondence between the performed finger motor sequences and the requested finger motor sequence).

  3. Evolution of trajectory error - Sequence 2

    Time frame: Each day in Sequence 2 (Sequence 1 is 10 days)

    The area under the curve of hand's trajectory according to the straight line joining the starting target and the final target.

  4. Evolution of maximal deviation - Sequence 2

    Time frame: Each day in Sequence 2 (Sequence 1 is 10 days)

    The maximal perpendicular distance between the position of the hand and the straight line joining the starting target and the final target

  5. Evolution of final error - Sequence 2

    Time frame: Each day in Sequence 2 (Sequence 1 is 10 days)

    The distance between the final position of the hand and the position of the final target.

  6. Evolution of movement speed - Sequence 3

    Time frame: Each day from day 2 to day 11 of Sequence 3 (Sequence 3 is 11 days)

    The duration of performed movement sequences

  7. Evolution of movement accuracy - Sequence 3

    Time frame: Each day from day 2 to day 11 of Sequence 3 (Sequence 3 is 11 days)

    The accuracy of performed movement sequences (i.e., the correspondence between the performed finger motor sequences and the requested finger motor sequence).

  8. Evolution of movement speed - Sequence 4

    Time frame: Each day in Sequence 4 (Sequence 4 is 6 days)

    The duration of performed movement sequences

  9. Evolution of movement accuracy - Sequence 4

    Time frame: Each day in Sequence 4 (Sequence 4 is 6 days)

    The accuracy of performed movement sequences (i.e., the correspondence between the performed finger motor sequences and the requested finger motor sequence).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evolution of motor evoked potentials amplitude - Sequence 1

    Time frame: Day 1, 5, 6, 10 and 11 in Sequence 1 (Sequence 1 is 11 days).

    Peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potentials

  2. Evolution of motor evoked potentials amplitude - Sequence 2

    Time frame: Each day in Sequence 2 (Sequence 2 is 10 days)

    Peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potentials

  3. Evolution of motor evoked potentials amplitude - Sequence 3

    Time frame: Day 1, 5, 6, 10 and 11 in Sequence 3 (Sequence 1 is 11 days)

    Peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potentials

  4. Evolution of motor evoked potentials amplitude - Sequence 4

    Time frame: Days 1, 5, and 6 in Sequence 4 (Sequence 4 is 6 days)

    Peak-to-peak amplitude of motor evoked potentials

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Florent Lebon, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 3 80 39 67 49

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-based Assessment of Mental Training Effects on Motor Learning in Healthy Participants

Acronym: IMAP-TMS

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2029
First posted
Mar 5, 2021
Registry last updated
Apr 20, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.