UConn Health
Farmington, Connecticut, 06030, United States
NCT Number: NCT05862870
This is a proposal for an administrative supplement to the parent study, "Individualized Assessment and Treatment Program for TMD: Coping as a Mechanism" (U01 DE028520). The parent study is currently engaged in exploring the extent to which the training of coping skills per se is an important mechanism of psychosocial treatment. The current project seeks to lay the groundwork for expanding the range of treatment mechanisms examined to include therapeutic relationship factors (therapist support, empathy, acknowledgment). The present supplemental study will provide instruction for individual patient pain management via an online application, with no therapist or counselor assistance. The aim is to determine the extent to which treatment-related outcomes (including adherence and pain) may be influenced by therapist support factors.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Farmington, Connecticut, 06030, United States
Psychosocial treatments have been effective for temporomandibular disorders (TMD), but the mechanisms of action for these treatments are unclear. Most studies of psychosocial treatment, including the parent U01, have focused on relatively specific psychosocial mechanisms, including coping skills acquisition, pain management self-efficacy, decrease in catastrophizing, increased mindfulness, acceptance, and readiness to change behavior to ameliorate pain. The 2 therapist-delivered treatments in the parent study are packaged CBT or Individualized Assessment and Treatment (IATP). Left untested in this study are common therapeutic factors that often emerge as influential in pain outcome research. These common, non-specific therapeutic factors include (especially): the therapeutic alliance; interpretation and understanding; emotional expression; reinforcement; information; and reassurance and support. Because both conditions of the parent U01 involve similar levels of therapist involvement, therapist support and other treatment-non-specific variables cannot be tested clearly. One way to assess these factors is to introduce a pain treatment that explicitly does not contain these factors; i.e., a treatment that does not employ therapists or require supervision by health care professionals. There are currently no studies published in which therapist-led treatments have been compared to a mobile application-based treatment.
The Investigators therefore propose to pilot test a mobile application treatment condition (painTrainer©) added as an additional treatment condition to the parent study, and provided to 20 patients in the coming year. This condition will deliver the content of the CBT condition of the parent study, but will do so with no therapist contact. If this mobile application is found credible and acceptable it may be used in additional comparisons with treatments conducted by therapists. Thus at some point it will be possible to parse the effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment content per se and therapist support factors.
An additional benefit of testing such a mobile application is that it might in the future provide a means to expand the reach of pain management professionals to remote and underserved populations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
patient self-administered pain management web application
Time frame: 8 months
Treatment is deemed feasible if 20 persons are recruited with 8 months and complete the program.
This number of patients recruited over this time period would indicate that the program is attractive to the target patient population.
If this number finish the program, it would indicate that the program was a feasible means of intervention.
Time frame: 3 months
The Treatment Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire is composed of 4 questions that assess treatment credibility, or the extent to which a treatment seems logical and able to address patient complaints. The credibility scores may range from 4 to 36, with higher scores indicating greater endorsement of credibility.
Time frame: baseline to 3 months after treatment
Graded Chronic Pain Scale Characteristic Pain Intensity (GCPS-CPI) score: GCPS-CPI is made up of 3 questions asking the patient to rate their pain Now, at its worst, and on average over the past 30 days. Scores on the index may range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicative of greater characteristic pain. Outcome is measured in change from baseline.
UConn Health
Other
Mobile Application Treatment for TMD: Feasibility Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07123883
Craniomandibular Disorders, Jaw Diseases
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06339736
Craniomandibular Disorders, Jaw Diseases
Pisa, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07614932
Craniomandibular Disorders, Jaw Diseases
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06948162
Behavior, Crowding
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details