Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
NCT Number: NCT01390272
This randomized clinical trial examines whether programs aimed at matching resources to patient hypertension (i.e. high blood pressure) control lead to greater reduction in systolic blood pressure (top number of blood pressure reading) than simply having maintenance phone calls in addition to usual care. Answering this question will provide important evidence concerning the overall goal of sustained long-term implementation of the disease management programs as part of patient aligned care teams in the Veterans Affairs and other healthcare systems.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Durham, North Carolina, 27705, United States
Project Objectives: The investigators are conducting a two-arm 18-month randomized clinical trial for patients with pharmaceutically treated hypertension for which systolic BP is not controlled (>/=140 mmHg for non-diabetic or >/=130 mmHg for diabetic patients). The primary aim will be to compare two treatment arms/strategies in terms of impact on systolic BP control: Arm 1 - An intervention arm using titrated disease management in which patients' hypertension control, assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months, will be used to decide the resource intensity of strategies: 1) Medium/level 1 resource intensity strategy: a registered nurse will provide monthly tailored behavioral support telephone calls + home BP monitoring; 2) High/level 2 resource intensity strategy: a pharmacist will provide monthly tailored behavioral support telephone calls + home BP monitoring + pharmacist-directed medication management; and 3) Booster (low) resource intensity strategy: a license practice nurse (LPN) will provide bi-monthly, non-tailored behavioral support telephone calls to patients whose systolic BP comes under control. Arm 2 - A control arm, in which an LPN will provide bi-monthly non-tailored behavioral support telephone calls (same procedures as the booster (low) resource intensity strategy component of the titrated intervention).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients must indicate that they both:
Exclusion criteria
A LPN will provide behavioral support telephone calls that do not include goal setting and directed problem solving every two months.
Other names: Control Arm - Low resource
Monthly tailored RN delivered calls + home BP monitoring.
Other names: Intervention Arm - Level 1
Pharmacist delivered telephone behavioral self-management support + Home BP monitoring with feedback to pharmacist + Algorithmic medication changes directed by pharmacist (with physician backup).
Other names: Intervention Arm - Level 2
Time frame: Baseline
Continuous change in systolic blood pressure was measured as the primary outcome. Mean systolic blood pressure was calculated by the average of 3 blood pressure measurements collected at the baseline study visits.
Time frame: 6 months
Continuous change in systolic blood pressure was measured as the primary outcome. Mean systolic blood pressure was calculated by the average of 3 blood pressure measurements collected at the 6- month study visits.
Time frame: 12 months
Continuous change in systolic blood pressure was measured as the primary outcome. Mean systolic blood pressure was calculated by the average of 3 blood pressure measurements collected at the12-month study visits.
Time frame: 18 months
Continuous change in systolic blood pressure was measured as the primary outcome. Mean systolic blood pressure was calculated by the average of 3 blood pressure measurements collected at the18- month study visits.
Time frame: Baseline
The investigators examined the difference in the degree of systolic BP control over the 18 months of the study between the intervention and control arms. Control was defined as SBP < 130mmHg for hypertensive patients with diabetes and < 140mmHg for patients without diabetes. Mean systolic blood pressure was calculated by the average of 3 blood pressure measurements collected at the baseline study visit.
Time frame: 6 months
The investigators examined the difference in the degree of systolic BP control over the 18 months of the study between the intervention and control arms. Control was defined as SBP < 130mmHg for hypertensive patients with diabetes and < 140mmHg for patients without diabetes. Mean systolic blood pressure was calculated by the average of 3 blood pressure measurements collected at the 6-month study visit.
Time frame: 12 months
The investigators examined the difference in the degree of systolic BP control over the 18 months of the study between the intervention and control arms. Control was defined as SBP < 130mmHg for hypertensive patients with diabetes and < 140mmHg for patients without diabetes. Mean systolic blood pressure was calculated by the average of 3 blood pressure measurements collected at the 12-study visit.
Time frame: 18 months
The investigators examined the difference in the degree of systolic BP control over the 18 months of the study between the intervention and control arms. Control was defined as SBP < 130mmHg for hypertensive patients with diabetes and < 140mmHg for patients without diabetes. Mean systolic blood pressure was calculated by the average of 3 blood pressure measurements collected at the18- month study visit.
Time frame: Over 18 months of study intervention
One of our secondary research questions was: "If the intervention results in greater reduction in SBP than the control group, is it cost effective?"
Intervention results did not show statistically significant differences between arms, therefore cost effectiveness analysis was not appropriate.
While cost effectiveness was not analyzed because it was a null trial, the investigators would have used resource utilization and cost data from VA data sets to measure VA outpatient and inpatient utilization and costs by arms over 18 months. The investigators would have examined hypertension-related outpatient pharmacy prescription counts and costs in order to compare them to total outpatient pharmacy costs and the investigators would have examined inpatient utilization and costs.
Time frame: Baseline
The investigators assessed adherence using patient self-report on a modified Morisky scale using 4 items:
A response of YES to any one of the 4 items indicated non-adherence, and responses of all no indicated adherence.
The numbers in the descriptive tables reflect number non-adherent.
Time frame: 6 months
The investigators assessed adherence using patient self-report on a modified Morisky scale using 4 items:
A response of YES to any one of the 4 items indicated non-adherence, and responses of all no indicated adherence.
The numbers in the descriptive tables reflect number non-adherent.
Time frame: 12 months
The investigators assessed adherence using patient self-report on a modified Morisky scale using 4 items:
A response of YES to any one of the 4 items indicated non-adherence, and responses of all no indicated adherence.
The numbers in the descriptive tables reflect number non-adherent.
Time frame: 18 months
The investigators assessed adherence using patient self-report on a modified Morisky scale using 4 items:
A response of YES to any one of the 4 items indicated non-adherence, and responses of all no indicated adherence.
The numbers in the descriptive tables reflect number non-adherent.
VA Office of Research and Development
Fed
Randomized Trial of Titrated Disease Management for Patients With Hypertension
Acronym: TDM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05610059
Aging, Behavior
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02439775
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07735468
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Osuna, Sevilla, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00837122
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Accra, Ghana
View Trial Details