Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04358250

Tissue Sparing Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Rationale of the study is to evaluate through a prospective randomized controlled study if a modified direct superior posterolateral approach (sperimental approach) to the hip articulation which entirely spares i.e. avoids the sacrifice of the fascia lata might elicit a better outcome in terms of gait, balance, strengths recovery, clinical performance, patient reported outcome measurement (Short Form-12(SF-12); Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)) and overall recovery time in patients undergoing TotalHipArthroplasty with the aid of dedicated, modified instrumentation in order to properly access this modified route.

The investigators expect an improvement on selected gait analysis parameters in sperimental approach in order of 2% of range of motion (ROM) recorded 1 month after surgery. Based on this assumption sample size calculation will be conducted.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Rationale of the study is to evaluate through a prospective randomized controlled study if a modified direct superior approach (experimental approach) to the hip articulation which entirely spares i.e. avoids the sacrifice of the fascia lata (posterolateral approach) might elicit a better outcome in terms of gait, balance,strenghts recovery, clinical performance, patient reported outcome measurements and overall recovery time in patients undergoing TotalHipArthroplasty with the aid of dedicated, modified instrumentation in order to properly access this modified route.Two patients groups will randomly be allocated in one of the two group with a computer generated 1:1 randomization table.Total number of subjects participating in the study:50.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

- Patients affected by:

  • Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis
  • Patients in the age from 60 to 85 included
  • Consenting to actively participate in the study and in the rehabilitation follow up program as foreseen by the study
  • 18 ≤ Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2
  • patient without contralateral THA

Exclusion criteria

-Revision procedures where other treatments or devices have failed

  • Active infection or suspected latent infection in or about the hip joint
  • Bone stock that is inadequate for support or fixation of the prosthesis
  • skeletal immaturity
  • any mental or neuromuscular disorder that would create an unacceptable risk of prosthesis instability, prosthesis fixation failure or complication in post-operative care
  • Obesity (BMI ≥30kg/m2)

Treatment and study plan

Direct Superior Approach

Procedure

GROUP II :Patients positioned in lateral decubitus.landmark for incision is the apex of the greater trochanter,and skin, subcutaneous tissue except fascia are incised accordingly. Fibers of gluteus will be separated and not incised.posterior capsulotomy is performed,;femur is dislocated and neck osteotomy carried out, followed by preparation of femoral canal with progressive broach. Acetabulum is prepared with burs of increasing diameter, and acetabular cup is impacted. A polyethylene insert and a femoral rasp are subsequently introduced.All remaining definitive implants can be positioned.

Other names: DSA

posterolateral approach

Procedure

GROUP I:patients are positioned in lateral decubitus.Landmark for incision is the apex of the greater trochanter.posterior capsulotomy is performed, femur is dislocated and neck osteotomy carried out, followed by preparation of femoral canal with progressive broach.Acetabulum is prepared with burs of increasing diameter,and acetabular cup is then impacted.All definitive implants can be positioned.

Primary outcomes

  1. evaluate spatiotemporal variables in meters among two different access routes, one a traditional posterolateral mini approach and the other a modified posterolateral superior approach fascia lata sparing

    Time frame: Change from Baseline spatiotemporal variables in meters at 3 months

    spatiotemporal variables: step length (meters), stride length (meters).

  2. evaluate spatiotemporal variables in percentage among two different access routes, one a traditional posterolateral mini approach and the other a modified posterolateral superior approach fascia lata sparing

    Time frame: Change from Baseline spatiotemporal variables in percentage at 3 months

    Spatiotemporal variables: stance phase (percentage), swing phase (percentage)

  3. evaluate kinematic parameters in degrees among two different access routes, one a traditional posterolateral mini approach and the other a modified posterolateral superior approach fascia lata sparing

    Time frame: Change from Baseline Kinematic parameters in degrees at 3 months

    Kinematic parameters (in degrees): hip flexion-extension ROM, hip abduction-adduction ROM, Hip rotation ROM, Hip Obliquity ROM.

Secondary outcomes

  1. evaluation of instability with BEStest

    Time frame: Change from Baseline BESTest at 3 months

    BESTest (Balance Evaluation System Test) that evaluate the risk of fall . Each patient will be asked to wear a belt and two gloves containing the magnetic sensors and to follow the OAK device instruction.The portable device detects, on real time, the position and the orientation of each sensor. It yields a point-score from 0 to 24 and it has been shown that the relative optimal cut-off point was a 16 point-score out of 24: a point score between 17 and 24 classifies a subject as low risk who would otherwise be classified as being at medium/high risk (the duration will be approximately 10 minutes)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2018
First posted
Apr 24, 2020
Registry last updated
Apr 24, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.