TIER-HF-PC
OtherThe patient will be assigned to one of the three levels of care which is determined by the results given by Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS).
NCT Number: NCT06244953
There is evidence for the effectiveness and feasibility of the individual components of TIER-HF-PC, however there is a need to test how these individual components interact to allow the researchers to deliver TIER-HF-PC as a model of care in its totality. In the short term, this study will assess if TIER-HF-PC is beneficial for patients and caregivers.
Interested in participating?
Request Info21 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore
Timely Interventions to Enable and Reach patients with Heart Failure, and their caregivers with Palliative Care, or TIER-HF-PC, is a novel model of palliative care, designed to address gaps of palliative care delivery for patients with advanced heart failure, and their caregivers.
TIER-HF-PC is a service, led by a health coach, with support by a palliative care physician. This health coach will actively screen and monitor patients for problems, and then match the type and intensity of palliative care treatments to the severity of problems reported. The health coach will also facilitate processes for patients to initiate contact with health care providers should problems arise. This decreases the overall burden on palliative care services, enabling a scalable and more cost-effective model of care for a larger number of patients. The service will also utilize a proactive approach to care, increasing self-care skills and understanding of disease and treatment options. Earlier palliative care support will enable problems to be managed actively before they escalate into crises.
Overall aim: To test the effectiveness and implementation of the interacting components of TIER-HF-PC.
Specific aim 1a: To evaluate the impact of TIER-HF-PC on patients. The primary outcome is patient quality-of-life at 24 weeks, measured on the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include patient anxiety, depression, coping, spirituality, healthcare utilization, survival, and cost-effectiveness of TIER-HF-PC.
Specific aim 1b: To evaluate the impact of TIER-HF-PC on caregivers. Outcomes evaluated include caregiver quality-of-life.
Specific aim 2: To evaluate the implementation outcomes of TIER-HF-PC.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The patient will be assigned to one of the three levels of care which is determined by the results given by Distress Thermometer (DT) and the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS).
Patient continues on clinical care by his/her cardiologist. If the cardiologist picks up their symptoms or other concerns, he/or can be referred to a specialist palliative care physician by the cardiologist.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks from baseline, till the point of patient death, or till week 48, whichever is earlier.
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) will be used: It is a 12-item QOL scale, composed of physical function, symptoms, QOL, social interference and summary score will be used. The KCCQ-12 has similar validity to the 23-item version and is shorter with less respondent burden. The KCCQ-12 can be self-reported by patients or read to patients over the phone by a research coordinator. The total summary score can range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better health status. A clinically meaningful change is defined as a change of at least 5 points on the KCCQ. The KCCQ-12 will be measured for all participants (TIER-HF-PC and usual care), and tracked every 8 weeks from baseline, till the point of patient death, or till week 48, whichever is earlier. The frequency of our proposed KCCQ tracking is referenced from trials which used KCCQ to track longitudinal changes in QOL.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 24 weeks.
The non cardiac specific health-related quality of life (EUROQOL EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire will also be used: This is a global assessment of the patient's quality-of-life in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, that can also be administered over the phone. The results from the 5 dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state utility. The EQ-5D-5L has been validated in the Singapore cardiac population.
Time frame: Every 8 weeks from baseline, till the point of patient death, or till week 48, whichever is earlier.
The Singapore Caregiver Quality of Life Scale-15 (SCQOLS-15) will be used: This is a 15-item scale with 5 domains measuring QOL of life caregivers in domains: physical well-being, mental well-being, experience and meaning, impact on daily life, and financial well-being will be used. This will be measured for all caregiver participants (TIER-HF-PC and usual care), and tracked every 8 weeks from baseline, till the point of patient death, or till week 48, whichever is earlier. A difference of between 3-5 points in QOL scores could serve as a benchmark to evaluate if the difference between intervention and usual-care group is meaningful.
Time frame: At Week 25.
The client satisfaction questionnaire (CSQ-4) will be used. The total score of the CSQ per participant will be computed. Analysis will be conducted on the patient and caregiver scores separately. The percentage of participants in TIER-HF-PC who have at least a CSQ score of 12 and above will also be calculated.
Time frame: From Week 25 onwards, up to Week 48.
Regarding the analysis of semi-structured interviews, a qualitative coding team who is experienced in qualitative analysis will be formed. Interviews will be open coded line by line. Code categories will be developed and iteratively adjusted through discussions. The code categories will be subsequently mapped back to the main domains of the RE-AIM and PRISM framework to identify key multi-level contextual factors influencing the TIER-HF-PC outcomes as well as to assess the adoption, implementation, and impact of TIER-HF-PC. Hence, the analysis will involve both inductive and deductive approaches.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 24 weeks.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) will be used. This is a 14-item scale with a score range of 0 to 42. It is composed of two subscales- anxiety and depression- with a cut-off point of 11 for each subscale, that determines anxiety and depression of clinical significance.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 24 weeks.
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 Item Scale (Facit-SP-12)/Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Non-Illness (FACIT-Sp Non-Illness) will be used. This is a 12-item survey that measures the spiritual well-being of patients and caregivers. The total of Facit-SP-12/ FACIT-Sp Non-Illness ranges from 0 to 48 with higher scores representing increased spirituality.
Time frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 24 weeks.
Brief Coping with Problems Experienced (Brief-COPE) scale will be used. It is a 28-item scale measuring the ways people cope with stressful events. It has been used in the heart failure population, where the coping style was shown to correlate with the level of physical functioning.
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 24.
The differences in community hospice usage, number and length of hospital admissions, number of emergency visits, number, and length of intensive care visits between TIER-HF-PC participants and those in usual care will be assessed using generalized linear models, with binomial model for community hospice usage and Poisson model with robust standard effort for other healthcare utilization outcomes.
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks.
The total cost of inpatient bills and outpatient bills including emergency visit bills for TIER-HF-PC participants and usual care participants from week 1 to week 24 will be summed up and the cost differences between both groups will be quantified by generalized linear model with Gamma model and robust standard error. The net cost of the TIER-HF-PC model will be calculated based upon the cost of care provision in TIER-HF-PC minus the cost savings from reduction of health care utilization. We will also calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to measure the average net cost per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained for TIER-HF-PC versus usual care participants. The QALY will be calculated by the product of quality-of-life (EQ-5d-5L) and survival.
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks.
The differences in survival between TIER-HF-PC and usual care will be analyzed using a Cox model regression, censoring at week 48 or death, whichever occurs earlier.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
National Cancer Centre, Singapore
Other
Acronym: TIER-HF-PC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07278583
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Clermont-Ferrand, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07581587
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07492524
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Yancheng, Dongtai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07482943
Cardiovascular Abnormalities, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hong Kong
View Trial Details