Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07376850

Time in rANge vs. Time in nOrmal Glycemia for Better Glycemic Control

The TANGO study is a 12-month study involving 120 children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) across the Czech Republic, Israel, and Poland who use automated insulin delivery (AID) systems.

Currently, the global standard for diabetes management is "Time in Range" (TIR), which aims to keep blood sugar levels between 70-180 mg/dL. However, newer technologies like AID systems may now allow for a tighter, more physiological goal called "Time in Normal Glycemia" (TING), which targets a range of 70-140 mg/dL.

This study will randomly assign participants to follow either the standard TIR target or the tighter TING target to see if the narrower range improves overall blood sugar control and HbA1c without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia, family stress, or daily treatment burden.

By comparing these two approaches, researchers hope to determine if clinical guidelines should be updated to reflect a more precise glucose target for children and adolescents worldwide

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

5 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This multinational, multicenter, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the clinical impact of targeting Time in Normal Glycemia (TING; 70-140 mg/dL) compared to the current standard, Time in Range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dL), in children and adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D).

Background and Rationale Managing glucose levels in pediatric T1D is essential for preventing long-term complications. While the international consensus currently recommends maintaining a TIR >70%, recent technological advances-such as automated insulin delivery (AID) systems and next-generation continuous glucose monitors (CGM)-now make it feasible to target narrower, more physiological glucose ranges. TING (70-140 mg/dL) has emerged as a potential new clinical metric for improved metabolic compensation. However, there is no definitive evidence yet that aiming for this tighter range leads to better long-term outcomes than the standard TIR without increasing treatment burden or psychological stress.

Study Objectives The primary objective is to determine if setting TING as the glycemic target improves CGM-derived glycemic metrics compared to the standard TIR approach.

Secondary objectives include:

Evaluating changes in HbA1c. Assessing differences in Quality of Life (QoL) and treatment burden using standardized patient and caregiver questionnaires.

Monitoring the safety and incidence of acute complications, such as severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).

Study Design and Population The study will enroll 120 children and adolescents (ages 5.0-17.99) across three tertiary pediatric diabetes centers in the Czech Republic, Israel, and Poland. All participants must be using AID systems and have used a CGM for at least 70% of the time in the month prior to enrollment.

From the target population, we aim to recruit 25% of individuals newly diagnosed.

Intervention and Methods

Participants will be randomized 1:1 into two groups:

TING Group (Intervention): Will follow a target glucose range of 70-140 mg/dL (3.9-7.8 mmol/L).

TIR Group (Control): Will follow the standard target range of 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10.0 mmol/L).

Both groups will receive structured education from a multidisciplinary team regarding CGM interpretation, glycemic targets, and self-management. In the TING group, CGM hyperglycemia targets will be lowered by at least 10% from baseline.

Timeline and Endpoints The study duration is 12 months. Data collection includes CGM metrics, insulin dose data, and HbA1c at 3-month intervals (Months 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12). A telephone check-up will occur 6 weeks after baseline to assess early adherence and treatment satisfaction.

Primary Endpoint: Change in TIR (70-180 mg/dL) between baseline and 12 months.

Secondary/Exploratory Endpoints: Percentage of time in TING, time in hypoglycemia (Levels 1 and 2), glycemic variability, and various QoL scores (PAID, INSPIRE, Hypoglycemia/Hyperglycemia Fear Surveys) .

Impact If targeting TING is proven beneficial and acceptable, the results of this trial could inform future clinical guidelines and redefine optimal glycemic targets for pediatric diabetes care globally.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of T1D per ADA criteria
  • Age 5.0-17.99 at the start of study
  • CGM use >70% of the time during the month prior to enrollment
  • Maximum HbA1c of 86mmol/mol (10% in DCCT)

Exclusion criteria

  • No concurrent illnesses impacting glycemia
  • No treatments impacting glycemia
  • Severe hypoglycemia documented in the 60 day period leading up to patient recruitment
  • Current participation in any other interventional study
  • Any significant diseases / conditions including psychiatric disorders and substance abuse that in the opinion of the investigator is likely to affect the subject's ability to complete the study or compromise participant's safety
  • Female subject who is pregnant or lactating or planning to become pregnant within the planned study duration

Treatment and study plan

Structured Diabetes Education

Other

A comprehensive standardized guideline will be provided to recruiting physicians from all centers, including the points below:

  • Understanding CGM data and trend interpretation
  • TIR or TING concepts according to randomization, target range, consequences of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia
  • Recognizing and management of hypoglycemia
  • Recognizing and management of hyperglycemia
  • Setting and adjusting of glycemic targets, alarms in CGM and insulin pumps, and insulin doses based on randomisation
  • Emotional coping strategies and involving family support

Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) System Adjustment

Other

For the TING group, CGM hyperglycemia target settings will be lowered by at-least 10% from the baseline values. The extent of the adjustment will be at the discretion of the attending physician

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Endpoint

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in TIR over 12 months (between M0 and M12) between TING and TIR groups

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diabetes-Related Emotional Distress in Pediatric Participants (PAID-Teen

    Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months

    A 20-item survey assessing emotional distress. Items are scored 0-4. Unit of Measure: Standardized score (Range: 0 to 100). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate higher distress.

  2. Participant Perceptions of Diabetes Technology - INSPIRE Patient Scale

    Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months

    QoL questionnaire: Assesses how young patients feel about their insulin delivery systems.

    Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (Range: 0 to 100). Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction and more positive expectations of the device.

  3. Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Diabetes Technology - INSPIRE Parent/Caregiver Scale

    Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months

    Assesses parent/caregiver perceptions of automated insulin delivery systems. Each item is scored 0-4.

    Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (Range: 0 to 100). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a more positive appraisal of the technology and better QoL.

  4. Parent/Caregiver Fear of Hypoglycemia (HFS-P)

    Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months

    A 26-item survey with two subscales: Behavior (11 items) and Worry (15 items). Items are rated from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).

    Unit of Measure: Total score (Range: 0 to 104). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate a greater fear of hypoglycemia.

  5. Parent/Caregiver Fear and Behaviors Related to Hyperglycemia (HAQ)

    Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months

    QoL questionnaire: Measures the extent of potentially problematic attitudes and behaviors used to avoid high blood sugar. It consists of 22 items rated 0-4.

    Unit of Measure: Total score (Range: 0 to 88). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater levels of hyperglycemia-related worry and more frequent avoidance behaviors.

  6. Diabetes-Related Emotional Distress in Parents/Caregivers (PAID-PR)

    Time frame: At enrollment, 6 months and 12 months

    A 18-item scale measuring the emotional burden of caregiving. Items are rated from 0 (no problem) to 4 (serious problem).

    Unit of Measure: Total score (Range: 0 to 72). Interpretation: Higher scores reflect greater diabetes-specific emotional distress.

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory endpoints

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference in the percentage of time in range (TIR) and time in normal glycemia (TING) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  2. Exploratory endpoints

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in time in hypoglycemia level 1 (3,0-3,8 mmol/l) and level 2 (<3,0 mmol/l), hyperglycemia level 1 (10,1-13,9 mmol/l) and level 2 (>13,9 mmol/l) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  3. Exploratory endpoints

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in Glycemic variability (SD, CV)

  4. Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in Mean glucose level

  5. Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: 12 months

    Difference in Insulin dose

  6. Exploratory endpoint

    Time frame: 12 months

    Change in HbA1c

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Motol

Other

Collaborators

  • Medical University of Warsaw
  • Schneider Children's Medical Center, Israel

Registry information

Acronym: TANGO

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 29, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 29, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.