Helwan university
Helwan, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06818799
The goal of this clinical trial is to know if thulium laser works to treat non-muscle invasive bladder cancer "NMIBC" efficiently in comparison to classical trans-urethral resection "TURBT". It will also learn about the safety of this technique. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does thulium laser lower the incidence of recurrence to participants with non- muscle invasive bladder cancer? What complications do participants have when using this technique? Investigators will compare thulium laser en-bloc resection to a classical trans-urethral en-bloc resection of bladder tumor
Participants will:
Do thulium laser en-bloc resection or trans-urethral en-bloc resection And will be classified to risk group according to European association of urology guidelines and followed up accordingly.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Helwan, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
The conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is the most common strategy for NMIBC and it is recommended by the guidelines. However, the TURBT has a complication rate of ~4-6%, of which urinary tract infections and significant haematuria are most common.
In some cases, major complications including obturator nerve reflex (ONR) and bladder perforation could occur. To overcome these drawbacks, lasers including holmium YAG and thulium YAG were introduced. Several studies have suggested the superior safety of Thulium laser resection of bladder tumors (TmLRBT) compared with conventional TURBT.
The TmLRBT is increasingly used in the treatment of NMIBC recently, but whether it can provide better cancer control than TURBT is still unclear.
Previous studies have compared the recurrence rates of these two therapies but no significant difference was detected.However, in all these studies, intravesical therapies were conducted using epirubicin or mitomycin C, instead of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), which is superior for preventing the recurrence of NMIBC.
En-bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT) was first described by Kawada et al. in 1997 and has been used by urologists since then. The main advantage of ERBT is that it can resect and extract the entire tumor with a high-quality specimen rather than piecemeal, overcoming some of the short comings of TURBT.
ERBT provides up to 95% of the detrusor muscle, thus leading to a more accurate pathological diagnosis. En-bloc resection is another well recognized procedure that can be performed with various types of energy, such as 2-μm continue-wave laser, holmium laser, Thulium laser, green-light laser, Hybrid-Knife, etc.
The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the outcome of Thulium laser with the Electrical Trans-urethral en-bloc resection of non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma regarding efficacy and complications.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
En-bloc laser technique
En-bloc technique
Time frame: 12 months
Number of participants with recurrence free survival during scheduled follow up protocol according to European association of urology guidelines
Time frame: 12 months
Number of participants with absence of local recurrence on the site of resection during follow up cystoscopy protocol
Time frame: Intra operative to 1 week post operative duration
Number of participants developed peri operative complications regarding severity of bleeding ,number of paricipants developed bladder wall perforation , number of participants developed obturator jerk and severity of lower urinary tract symptoms
Helwan University
Other
Evaluation of Thulium Laser Endoscopic En-bloc Resection Versus Conventional Trans-urethral En-bloc Resection of Primary Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07234968
Bladder Cancer, Bladder Neoplasm
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04617743
Bladder Cancer Recurrent, Carcinoma
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07657299
Bladder Cancer, Bladder Cancer Recurrence
Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07505615
Carcinoma, Female Urogenital Diseases
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
View Trial Details