Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00147498

Three Dose Levels of CP-690,550 Monotherapy Versus Placebo, Administered Orally Twice Daily (BID) for 6 Weeks

The study's objective is to compare the efficacy of 3 dose levels of oral CP-690,550 monotherapy (5 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg twice daily [BID]) versus placebo administered over 6 weeks for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Pfizer Investigational Site, Ghent, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject has a history of inadequate response to at least 1, but no more than 4, of the following DMARDs: sulfasalazine, injectable gold, methotrexate, leflunomide, cyclosporine, or a thiopurine derivative (azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine)

Exclusion criteria

  • Current Therapy With Any DMARD Or Biologic

Treatment and study plan

CP-690,550

Drug

Oral tablets administered at a dose of 5 mg BID for 6 weeks

Placebo

Other

Placebo tablets

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in tender joints count (TJC); >= 20% improvement in swollen joints count (SJC); and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, and 8

    ACR20 response: >=20% improvement in TJC; >= 20% improvement in SJC; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    ACR50 response: >= 50% improvement in TJC or SJC and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response

    Time frame: Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    ACR70 response: >= 70% improvement in TJC or SJC and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.

  4. Area Under the Numeric Index of American College of Rheumatology Response (ACR-n) Curve

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 6

    ACR-n: calculated by taking the lowest percentage improvement in (1) SJC or (2) TJC or (3) the median of the remaining 5 components of the ACR response (participant's assessment of disease activity; participant's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value - CRP). Negative numbers indicate worsening. The area under the curve (AUC) for ACR-n is the measure of the AUC of the mean change from baseline in ACR-n. The trapezoidal rule was used to compute the AUC.

  5. Tender Joints Count (TJC)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.

  6. Change From Baseline in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from baseline indicated an improvement.

  7. Swollen Joints Count (SJC)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.

  8. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from baseline indicates an improvement.

  9. Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

  10. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.

  11. Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

  12. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.

  13. Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

  14. Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.

  15. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

  16. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

  17. C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is 0 milligram per liter (mg/L) to 100 mg/L. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

  18. Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is 0 mg/L to 100 mg/L. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

  19. Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP])

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score ranging 0 to 9.4; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS 28-3 (CRP) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and greater than (>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and less than (<) 2.6 = remission.

  20. Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count and CRP (mg/L). Total score ranging 0 to 9.4; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity. DAS 28-3 (CRP) <=3.2 implied low disease activity and >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and <2.6 = remission.

  21. Number of Participants With Categorization of Disease Improvement Based on DAS28-3 (CRP)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8

    Disease improvement was classified as good, moderate, and no change based on improvement in DAS 28-3 (CRP) from baseline and present DAS 28-3 (CRP) score. Good: an improvement from baseline of >1.2 and a present score of <=3.2; none: an improvement of <=0.6 or >0.6 to <=1.2 with a present score of >5.1; remaining participants were classified as having moderate improvement. Scores of good and moderate were considered to have therapeutic response.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study To Compare 3 Dose Levels Of CP-690,550 Versus Placebo, Administered Orally Twice Daily (BID) For 6 Weeks, In The Treatment Of The Signs And Symptoms Of Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2006
First posted
Sep 7, 2005
Registry last updated
Jan 30, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.