Lubna DAR
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT07624708
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of three Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) delivery modalities in treating Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in adult patients (ages 20-40) with mild to moderate PTSD severity in Pakistan.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Do participants show significant reductions in psychological inflexibility, emotional dysregulation, and PTSD symptom severity from pre- to post-intervention? 2. Which ACT delivery modality - treatment as usual (TAU/clinic-only), clinician-guided with web-app assistance, or online-only with web-app assistance - produces the greatest improvements in these outcomes?
Researchers will compare three groups: (A) TAU receiving clinic-based ACT sessions without app support, (B) clinic-based ACT sessions assisted by the "ACT PTSD" web application, and (C) fully online ACT delivery with web-app support - to determine whether digital augmentation enhances treatment outcomes beyond standard clinical delivery.
Participants will:
* Complete baseline assessments (PCL-5, AAQ-II, DERS-SF, PDEQ-SF) at intake * Attend 12 weekly individual ACT sessions (30-45 minutes each) covering psychoeducation, acceptance, cognitive defusion, self-as-context, grounding, values clarification, committed action, trauma processing, and relapse prevention * Use the "ACT PTSD" web application between sessions (Groups B and C), which delivers the six ACT core processes through guided exercises, audio tracks, symptom tracking, and therapist messaging * Complete post-intervention assessments and one follow-up session after the 12-week program
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The ACT Path web application is a clinician-gated, ACT-based treatment-assistance tool developed specifically for adults with PTSD. Unlike self-administered apps, it operates within a therapist-controlled workflow: clients access 12 structured weekly sessions only after clinical approval, with session assignment (including flexible sequencing of trauma narrative work) guided by the therapist. All six ACT hexaflex processes are delivered via interactive sessions with embedded audio guidance and gamified defusion exercises. Built-in validated assessments (PCL-5, AAQ-II, DERS-SF, PDEQ-SF) auto-score and populate a therapist dashboard; a unique safety screen flags suicidal ideation and harm risk across three timeframes. A panic button provides crisis support. Cultural adaptation for a collectivistic, low-resource context distinguishes it from existing Western-developed PTSD apps.
Time frame: pre-intervention and immediatly after the intervention
PCL-5 is a 20-item self-report measure designed to evaluate the severity of PTSD symptoms. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale from 0-4 (0= Not at all & 4=Extremely). The scores range from 0 to 80. The scales showed good internal reliability with a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0.90. The scale has no reverse-coded items. The scale has 4 subscales: Cluster B: Intrusion symptoms (5 items), Cluster C: Avoidance (2 items), Cluster D: Negative alterations in cognitions and mood (7 items), and Cluster E: Alterations in arousal and reactivity (6 items)
Time frame: pre-intervention and immediatly after the intervention
Psychological inflexibility was measured with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), which is a brief 7-item self-report measure. AAQ-II uses a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never true) to 7 (always true). The scale is also a unidimensional scale with no reverse coding. Low scores indicate the presence of psychological flexibility, whereas higher scores indicate higher psychological inflexibility.
Time frame: pre-intervention and immediatly after the intervention
The DERS-SF is an 18-item self-report measure designed to evaluate individuals' typical patterns of emotional regulation difficulties while maintaining the score structure of the original DERS. The scale utilizes a 5-point Likert scale (1=Almost never to 5=Almost always). The total score ranges from 18 to 90; a higher score indicates higher emotional dysregulation. The scale also showed good internal reliability, 0.89-0.94. The scale has 6 subscales: Non-acceptance of emotional responses (3 items), difficulty engaging in goal-directed behavior (3 items), impulse control difficulties (3 items), lack of emotional awareness (3 items), limited access to emotion regulation strategies (3 items), and lack of emotional clarity (3 items). All the items of lack of emotional awareness are reverse-coded items.
University of Central Punjab
Other
A Three-Arm Quasi-Experimental Study Comparing Treatment-as-Usual, Face-to-Face Acceptance and Commitment Therapy With App-Assisted Support, and Online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy With App-Assisted Support for PTSD Symptoms
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05862467
Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Laramie, Wyoming, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06130501
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Mental Disorders
Cape Girardeau, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05280691
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Winterthur, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07108608
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Mental Disorders
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details