Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment in Patients With Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures Without Neurological Deficit
NCT06059820
Back Injuries, Fracture of Spine, Level Unspecified
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT02827214
Thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures in neurologically intact patients account for approximately 45% of all TL spine injuries. Despite being common fractures, there is significant variability in treatment recommendations encompassing surgery and non-surgical treatment options. The controversy regarding optimal treatment for these injuries is fueled by several studies which suggest a potential benefit to surgical treatment in the realm of patient satisfaction, and the overall socio-economic burden of treatment while other studies demonstrate improved outcomes and lower morbidity with non-surgical treatment. This study aims to perform a prospective cohort analysis investigating the clinical outcome of various treatment alternatives for patients with A3/A4 fractures in the thoracolumbar region. A cost-effectiveness analysis will also be performed to identify costs and benefits of each treatment option. More specifically a sub-group analysis will be performed for this group of patients, which have equipoise in regards to patients treatment, as decided by a blinded review panel.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Observational
Alfred Health operating through the Alfred hospital, Melbourne, Australia
208 subjects (i.e., 137 per surgical group; 71 per conservative group) with TL burst fractures AOSpine classification type A3 or A4 without neurological deficit as defined in the inclusion/exclusion criteria, and with or without suspected Posterior Ligament Complex (PLC) injury (M1) from T10 to L2, will be enrolled in a prospective multicenter cohort study. Patients may have an associated B injury, but must have an A3 or A4. Patients will be monitored prospectively for patient reported, clinical and radiologic outcomes, over a period of 2 years post-treatment. Specifically a patient diary will measure the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and employment information (indirect costs questionnaire) every second week until 6 months post-treatment. Diary will continue every second month until 2 years post-treatment. All interventions/examinations are considered as standard of care.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 1 year
ODI within the first year after surgical or non-surgical treatment using time to event analysis
Time frame: 2 years
AOSpine PROST consists of 19 questions on aspects of functioning such as personal care, traveling, and emotional functioning after the accident causing the spinal injury. Each item has a 0-100 numeric rating scale, supported by smileys at both ends of the ruler. It is important to realize that 0 indicates a level at which the patient is non-functional and 100 indicates the level before the accident, no matter how well or poorly the patient functioned before the accident.
Time frame: 2 years
The EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument that was designed for self-completion. It has five items (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression) with a three-point categorical response scale (1 = no problems, 2 = some / moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems) where the patient's current health status will be assessed.
Time frame: 2 years
The NPRS measures the subjective intensity of pain. The patient is asked to make a pain rating, corresponding to his/her experienced pain.
Time frame: 2 years
The SAVES is a prospective adverse event (AE) recording instrument. The AEs are defined as any unexpected or undesirable events occurring as a result of spinal surgery, and a complication as a disease or disorder, which, as a consequence of a surgical procedure, that will negatively affect the outcome of a patient.
Time frame: 2 years
The overall satisfaction with treatment questionnaire contents one question regarding the satisfaction with the results of the recent treatment of the spine injury with a rating system from extremely satisfied (1) to not sure/no opinion (8)
Time frame: 2 years
Failure rate of conservative treatment will be assessed during this study. Non-surgical treatment failure is defined as necessity of surgery after non-surgical treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
Surgical treatment failure is defined as necessity of an additional surgery after the primary surgical treatment.
Time frame: 2 years
The indirect cost questionnaire assesses the personal situation of the patient at his workplace regarding to health, support, and their financial income statement
Time frame: 2 years
The participating clinics will upload the clinical data (de-identified X-rays, CT, MRI images) on a secure web-based platform. AOSpine Knowledge Forum Trauma Steering committee members, blinded to the diagnosis made in the study, will analyze the different images to validate the different TL fractures type A3 or A4 with or without PLC injury according to the new AOSpine TL Classification System.
AO Innovation Translation Center
Other
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures (AOSpine A3, A4) in Neurologically Intact Patients: An Observational, Multicenter Cohort Study Comparing Surgical Versus Non-surgical Treatment
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06059820
Back Injuries, Fracture of Spine, Level Unspecified
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT05003180
Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture
Oslo, Norway
View Trial Details