Menoufia university
Cairo, Shibin Elkom, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06324253
The aim of this study is to compare between Thoracic Epidural Analgesia (TEA) with ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block in radical cystectomy surgery for analgesic efficacy and hemodynamic effects
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Shibin Elkom, Egypt
The patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups using a computer program.
Group A: will receive bilateral Erector Spinae Block after induction of anesthesia.
Group B: will receive Thoracic Epidural Block before induction of anesthesia.
The methods:
Preoperative evaluation of each patient will include full history taking, revision of all laboratory investigations and full clinical examination.
On arrival to the operation room, a standard monitoring will be connected to the patient
In group A, after induction of anesthesia bilateral Ultrasound ESP block will be performed in the left lateral decubitus position under strict aseptic precautions. linear ultrasound transducer will be placed in a sterile cover, and positioned on the midline to identify the T10 spinous process. From this position, the ultrasound transducer will be moved 2-3 cm laterally to visualise the hyperechoic line of the T10 transverse process with its associated acoustic shadow inferiorly, and the overlying erector spinae muscle superiorly. transverse using in-plane approach a needle will be inserted in caudal-cephalad direction, until the tip is contact with the T10 transverse process and will be in the interfacial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle group. A dose of 30 ml 0.125% Bupivacaine will be injected.
In group B, before induction of anesthesia under strict aseptic precautions, 18Gauge Tuohy's needle with Huber's tip will be inserted via median approach after local infiltration with 5 ml of 2% lignocaine at the level of T9-T10 or T10-T11 intervertebral space in the sitting position. After identifying epidural space using loss of resistance technique, 5 ml of saline will be administered after negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid and 20Gauge epidural catheter will be threaded 5 cm cranially.then will be administered a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine through epidural catheter followed by continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at the rate of 0.1 ml/kg/hour . Patients in either group with inadequate analgesia will be excluded from the study.
General anesthesia induction will be achieved using fentanyl 1µg/kg (IV), propofol 2mg/kg (IV), and0.5mg/kg of IV Atracurium. General anesthesia will be maintained with mechanical ventilation with isoflurane (MAC 0.8: 1.2) with O2 \\ Air mixture.
During anesthesia maintenance Intraoperatively, if BP or heart rate (HR) increase more than 20% from baseline, intravenous morphine will be given to stabilize the patients' haemodynamics.
All patients will receive 1g intravenous paracetamol and 4 grams ondansetron 8mg dexamethasone.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
will receive bilateral Erector Spinae Block after induction of anesthesia
Other names: ESB
will receive Thoracic Epidural Block before induction of anesthesia .a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine through epidural catheter followed by continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at the rate of 0.1 ml/kg/hour
Other names: TEA
Time frame: 24 hours
the time of request of the patient of analgesia wil be recorded
Time frame: 24 hours
the record of patient expression to pain wil be recorded
Time frame: 24 hours
total opioid consumption
Time frame: pulse per minute--mmhge
the HR and MBP will be recorded perioperative
Time frame: 24 hours
possible complications to the blocks wil be recorded
Menoufia University
Other
Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia With Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Radical Cystectomy Surgery: A Randomised Trial
Acronym: TEAvsESB
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06546722
Cardiac Surgery, Neurologic Manifestations
Beirut, Lebanon
View Trial DetailsNCT05982392
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT01307202
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05374499
Neurologic Manifestations, Pain
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details