Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03448419

This Study Tests Empagliflozin in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF). The Study Looks at How Far Patients Can Walk in 6 Minutes and at Their Heart Failure Symptoms

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin 10 mg versus placebo on exercise ability using the 6 minute walk test in patients with chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 40%) Secondary objectives are to assess Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO)

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Of full age of consent (according to local legislation, usually ≥ 18 years) at screening.
  • Male or female patients. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP)1 must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in the patient information.
  • Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with ICHGCP and local legislation prior to admission to the trial
  • 6MWT distance ≤350 m at screening and at baseline.
  • Patients with chronic HF diagnosed for at least 3 months before Visit 1 and currently in NYHA class II-IV
  • Chronic HF with reduced EF defined as LVEF ≤ 40 % as per echocardiography at Visit 1 as per local reading (obtained under stable condition).
  • Elevated NT-proBNP > 450 pg/ml for patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) OR NTproBNP > 600 pg/ml for patients with AF as analysed at the Central laboratory at Visit 1
  • Patients must be clinically stable and on appropriate and stable dose of medical therapy for HF (such as ACEi, ARB, β-blocker, oral diuretics, MRA, ARNI, ivabradine), consistent with prevailing CV guidelines, stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1(screening) with the exception of diuretics which must have been stable for at least two weeks prior to Visit 1. The investigator must document the reason in case the patient is not on such medication or if not on target dose of any heart failure medication as per local guidelines.
  • Clinically stable at randomization with no signs of heart failure decompensation (as per investigator judgement).
  • Appropriate use of medical devices such as cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) consistent with prevailing local or international CV guidelines, and if a device is required, it must have been implanted for at least 3 months prior to visit 1 for CRT and 1 month prior to visit 1 for ICD.

Exclusion criteria

  • Myocardial infarction (increase in cardiac enzymes in combination with symptoms of ischaemia or newly developed ischaemic ECG changes), coronary artery bypass graft surgery or other major cardiovascular surgery, stroke or TIA in past 90 days prior to Visit 1
  • Acute decompensated HF (exacerbation of chronic HF) requiring intravenous (i.v.) diuretics, i.v. inotropes or i.v. vasodilators, or left ventricular assist device within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1, and/or during screening period until Visit 2
  • Previous or current randomisation in another Empagliflozin Heart Failure trial (i.e. studies 1245.110, 1245.121, 1245-0167)
  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM)
  • Impaired renal function, defined as eGFR < 20 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD-EPIcr) or requiring dialysis, as determined at Visit 1
  • Symptomatic hypotension or a SBP < 100 mmHg at Visit 1 or 2
  • Systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 180 mmHg at Visit 1 or 2, or SBP >160mmHg at both Visit 1 and 2
  • Atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with a resting heart rate >110 bpm documented by ECG at Visit 1 (Screening)
  • Unstable angina pectoris in past 30 days prior to Visit 1
  • Largest distance walked in 6 minutes (6MWTD) at baseline <100m.
  • Any presence of condition that precludes exercise testing such as:
  • claudication,
  • uncontrolled (according to investigator judgement) bradyarrhythmia or tachyarrhythmia,
  • significant musculoskeletal disease,
  • primary pulmonary hypertension,
  • severe obesity (body mass index ≥40.0 kg/m2),
  • orthopedic conditions that limit the ability to walk (such as arthritis in the leg, knee or hip injuries)
  • amputation with artificial limb without stable prosthesis function for the past 3 months
  • Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would contraindicate the assessment of 6MWT
  • Patients in a structured (according to Investigator judgement) exercise training program in the 1 month prior to screening or planned to start one during the course of this trial.
  • Planned implantation of ICD or CRT during the course of the trial.
  • Treatment with i.v. iron therapy or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to screening
  • Treatment with i.v. iron therapy or erythropoietin within 3 months prior to screening
  • Further exclusion criteria applies

Treatment and study plan

Empagliflozin

Drug

Film-coated tablet

Other names: JARDIANCE, JARDIANZ, GIBTULIO

Placebo

Drug

Film-coated tablet

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) Distance

    Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

    Change from baseline to week 12 in exercise capacity as measured by the distance walked in 6 minutes in standardised conditions. If repeated 6MWT measurements were available for the same day, the longest distance was used for analysis. Change from baseline was defined as the distance walked in 6 minutes at week 12 minus the baseline value. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. If a participant was present at the visit at week 12 but did not perform the 6MWT, the participant was evaluated as having walked a distance of 0 meter. If no value was available for week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Total Symptom Score (TSS)

    Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

    Change from baseline in KCCQ-TSS was defined as the endpoint value at week 12 minus the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The KCCQ is 23 item self-administered questionnaire and comprises 7 domains: physical limitation, symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, social limitation, self-efficacy and quality of life. Additionally 3 summary scores exist: TSS, clinical summary score, and overall summary score. The scores of the KCCQ domains and summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better outcome. If no questionnaire was available at week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above. If no questionnaire was available at baseline, change from baseline was not imputed.

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Chronic Heart Failure Questionnaire Self- Administered Standardized Format (CHQ-SAS) Dyspnea Score

    Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

    Change from baseline in CHQ-SAS was defined as the endpoint value at week 12 minus the last available endpoint value before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The CHQ-SAS evaluates 3 domains: dyspnoea, fatigue, and emotional function. Scores of the domains range from 1 to 7, with higher score indicating better quality of life. If no questionnaire was available at week 12, an imputed value was used. Patients with missing week 12 data who had no clinical event were ranked below any patient with non-missing data, but above the patients who had clinical events. Patients who died before week 12 were ranked below the patients in all categories above. If no questionnaire was available at baseline, change from baseline was not imputed.

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Exercise Capacity as Measured by the 6-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT) Distance

    Time frame: At baseline and at week 6

    Change from baseline to week 6 in exercise capacity as measured by the distance walked in 6 minutes in standardised conditions. Change from baseline was defined as the distance walked in 6 minutes at week 6 minus the baseline value. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication.

    If a participant was present at the visit at week 6 but did not perform the 6MWT, the participant was evaluated as having walked a distance of 0 meter. If no value was available for week 6, an imputed value was used.

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Clinical Congestion Score

    Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

    Change from baseline to week 12 in Clinical Congestion score is defined as the score-value at week 12 minus the score-value at baseline. Baseline value was defined as the last available measurement before start of treatment with randomised study medication. The Clinical Congestion Score (summary score) is based on 3 items: orthopnoea, jugular venous distention (JVD) and oedema. Each item was assessed through a 4-measure questionnaire, which was further converted to a standardised 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3, with 0 indicating no or fewer symptoms and 3 indicating continous or more symptoms. If at least 2 of the 3 items are not missing, the summary score is calculated as: (average over items JVD, orthopnea and oedema actually answered)*3. The summary score range from 0 to 9, with lower value indicating better health, and higher value indicating worse health. Mean is adjusted mean.

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms

    Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

    Change from baseline to week 12 in PGI-S of Heart Failure Symptoms. The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Heart Failure Symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the patient's impression of symptoms severity, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue and swelling. The PGI-S asks the Patient to choose one response that best describes how his/her heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue and swelling are now on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'Not at all' (1) to 'Very severe' (5). Number of participants by change in score are reported. Change in score was defined as the number of categories improved/deteriorated from baseline to week 12.

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of Dyspnoea

    Time frame: At baseline and at week 12

    Change from baseline to week 12 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) of dyspnoea. The PGI-S of Dyspnoea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the participant´s impression of symptom severity, specifically dyspnoea. The PGI-S item asks the participant to choose one response that best describes how his/her dyspnoea is now on a 5-point scale, ranging from 'Not at all' (1) to 'Very severe' (5). Number of participants by change in score are reported. Change in score was defined as the number of categories improved/deteriorated from baseline to week 12.

  7. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms at Week 12

    Time frame: At week 12

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Heart Failure Symptoms is a 1-item questionnaire to assess the patient's impression of change in heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling. The PGI-C asks the patient to choose one Response that best describes the overall change (if any) in his/her heart failure symptoms, specifically: shortness of breath, fatigue, and swelling since he/she started taking the study medication on a 7- category scale ranging from 'Very much better' (+3) to 'Very much worse' (-3).

  8. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) in Dyspnea at Week 12

    Time frame: At week 12

    The PGI-C in Dyspnoea is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess the patient's Impression of change in dyspnoea. The PGI-C asks the patient to choose one response that best describes the change (if any) in his/her shortness of breath when performing usual activities since he/she started taking the study medication on a 7-category scale ranging from 'Very much better' (+3) to 'Very much worse' (-3).

  9. Relative Change From Baseline to Week 12 in N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide (NTproBNP)

    Time frame: Within 3 weeks prior to treatment start and at Week 12

    Relative change from baseline to week 12 in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP). Relative change from baseline is expressed as ratio of week 12 to baseline. Baseline value was defined as the mean of all available measurements from the screening visit until start of treatment with randomised study medication.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim

Industry

Collaborators

  • Eli Lilly and Company

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Randomised, Double-blind Trial to Evaluate the Effect of 12 Weeks Treatment of Once Daily EMPagliflozin 10 mg Compared With Placebo on ExeRcise Ability and Heart Failure Symptoms, In Patients With Chronic HeArt FaiLure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) (EMPERIAL-reduced)

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Feb 28, 2018
Registry last updated
Nov 27, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.