The use of topical treatments for Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is an option that has been widely explored and it is currently listed as an options by WHO in those situations where the patient has few lesions (≤ 4) of less than ≤ 4 cm in diameter and located in areas of the body which may be treated topically.
Local heat, especially the one produced by radio frequency waves (Themo-Med®) has been widely tested for CL in both Old and New World. The advantages of using thermotherapy include: 1) high security profile; 2) only one session is required which ensures compliance with treatment; 3) easy to use in the field since the machine operates with batteries; 4) its effectiveness does not depend on the species of Leishmania causing the lesion as it is a physical measure; and 5) it can be used in patients in whom systemic treatment with antimonials are contraindicated, including women who are pregnant or breastfeeding. In the New World, Thermo-Med® has been evaluated in Mexico, Guatemala, Colombia and Brazil (all but one were randomized clinical trials), reporting cure rates of 90%, 73%, 64% and 75% respectively
There are no clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of miltefosine for CL when given for less than 20 days. The 21-day course was chosen to give the best chances to the combination approach and based on a) the results of a Phase II trial conducted in Colombia showing that a mean dose of miltefosine of 133 mg/day/20 days resulted in a cure rate of 82%20 and; b) a report showing that the a daily administration of 100 mg/day (2.5 mg/kg of body weight/day for 28 days) resulted in a mean maximum concentration of drug in serum at day 23 of treatment of 70,000 ng/ml21.
The theoretical advantages offered by this combination are that a) we are using two approaches that are currently recommended for use individually and for which there is good information regarding their efficacy and safety when used alone; b) the use of a topical plus a systemic treatment would hypothetically have an additive effect, since systemic treatment would eliminate those circulating or remaining parasites located in the periphery of the lesion that topical treatment fails to remove and which might be the cause of relapses22,23; c) it offers the opportunity to increase the current cure rate reported with any other treatment approach available when used alone; d) it will reduce the length of treatment with miltefosine and hopefully the cost and rates of adverse events associated with 28 days of treatment with miltefosine.