Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07463456

Inter-Device Concordance of Plantar Thermal Asymmetry Measurement (HIK-DM-2026)

This cross-sectional observational study measures the inter-device concordance between two infrared thermographic cameras, a low-cost model (HIKMICRO Mini2 V2) and a high-resolution model (HIKMICRO M60), when measuring plantar skin temperature in adults with diabetes mellitus. Each participant undergoes two consecutive thermographic acquisitions, always less than 10 seconds apart, from a fixed tripod at 75 cm, under standardized environmental conditions. The order of the two cameras is randomized 1:1 at participant level (sequence A: M60 then Mini2 V2; sequence B: Mini2 V2 then M60). The primary endpoint is the agreement between the two devices for contralateral thermal asymmetry (Delta T) in each of six pre-specified plantar regions of interest (ROIs), quantified by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for absolute agreement, with the consistency ICC for mean plantar temperature (Tmean) as an exploratory endpoint.

The study is strictly metrological. Neither camera is a medical device under Regulation (EU) 2017/745, no clinical decision is derived from the measurements, and the study does not evaluate the detection, diagnosis, screening or prevention of any disease. Neither device is designated as a diagnostic reference standard. Participants with diabetes mellitus are included solely because plantar thermal variability is greater in this population, which makes the inter-device comparison metrologically demanding.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Clínica Avanza Salud

San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, 38201, Spain

Location contact

Eduardo Luis Martín Javier

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34 647 773 675

About this study

Each participant is assessed in a single session in a thermally stable room at 20 to 25 degrees Celsius, with relative humidity recorded as a covariate. After 15 minutes of acclimatization in a semi-Fowler position with the backrest at 30 to 45 degrees, both cameras acquire plantar thermograms from a static tripod at a fixed distance of 75 cm, with the tripod head at 90 degrees to the plantar plane and an emissivity setting of 0.98. The two radiometric acquisitions are consecutive and always less than 10 seconds apart. The order of the cameras is randomized 1:1 at participant level (sequence A: M60 then Mini2 V2; sequence B: Mini2 V2 then M60), from a list generated in advance by a team member not involved in image acquisition and kept in a password-protected file until recruitment is complete. No specific background is used.

Thermograms are exported to HIKMICRO Analyzer version 2.0.1. Six anatomical regions of interest, defined a priori and identical for both cameras, are delimited on each foot: hallux, first, third and fifth metatarsal heads, midfoot and heel. There is no post-hoc region selection and no indexing to either device. Contralateral thermal asymmetry (Delta T) is computed per region as the absolute difference in mean temperature between homologous regions of the right and left foot.

Images are renamed with an alphanumeric code that removes any explicit reference to the source device before analysis, and regions are delimited by an independent evaluator blinded to the neurological status of the participant. Technical blinding is acknowledged as partial, because the difference in spatial resolution between the two cameras may allow a trained evaluator to infer the source device.

The sample size follows the method of Walter, Eliasziw and Donner for the intraclass correlation coefficient, with a null hypothesis of ICC0 = 0.65 against an alternative of ICC1 = 0.80, alpha = 0.05, nominal power 0.80 and two observations per participant, which yields a minimum of 77 participants. The study enrolls 130 participants, which raises the actual power for this contrast to 95.7 percent and absorbs expected losses.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Preserved plantar skin integrity at the time of the test.
  • Voluntary signature of the informed consent after receiving detailed information about the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Active ulcers or open wounds in the plantar area, since exudation alters thermal emissivity.
  • Acute skin infection or extensive mycosis of the foot.
  • Previous partial amputation of the forefoot or midfoot that alters the anatomy of the regions of interest.
  • Severe peripheral arterial disease (Fontaine grade IV, critical ischemia) compromising tissue viability.
  • Physical or cognitive inability to remain in the semi-Fowler position (backrest 30 to 45 degrees) during the 15 minutes of the acclimatization protocol.
  • Intense physical activity or hydrotherapy within the 2 hours before the appointment, and caffeine intake or tobacco use within the same period, because of their vasoconstrictor effects.
  • Acute febrile state, body or tympanic temperature above 37.5 degrees Celsius at the time of the test.
  • Application of creams, moisturizing lotions, topical ointments or talcum powder to the plantar area within the 4 hours before the examination, because of the alteration of infrared emissivity and the evaporative cooling effect.

Treatment and study plan

HIKMICRO® Mini2 V2

Device

Low-cost infrared thermographic camera (256 x 192 pixels, NETD below 40 mK) used solely as a measuring instrument. It is not a medical device and no clinical decision is derived from its readings.

HIKMICRO® M60

Device

High-resolution infrared thermographic camera (640 x 480 pixels, NETD below 35 mK) used as a technical comparator. It is not designated as a clinical or diagnostic reference standard.

Primary outcomes

  1. Intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement, ICC(A,1), between the two cameras for contralateral thermal asymmetry (Delta T) in each of six pre-specified plantar regions of interest

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    Delta T is computed per region as the absolute difference in mean temperature between homologous regions of the right and left foot. One ICC(A,1) is reported for each of the six regions defined a priori (hallux, first, third and fifth metatarsal heads, midfoot and heel), with its 95 percent confidence interval, using the McGraw and Wong (1996) formulation, equivalent to ICC(2,1) of Shrout and Fleiss (1979), two-way random effects, single measurement. Each region contributes 130 paired measurements. The study hypothesis is ICC greater than or equal to 0.80, tested against a null of ICC0 = 0.65. Neither device is treated as a reference standard.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cohen's Kappa for inter-device agreement in the binary classification of thermal asymmetry at the 2.2 degree Celsius cut-off, per region of interest

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    Overall agreement proportion and Kappa with 95 percent confidence interval for the dichotomous classification Delta T greater than or equal to 2.2 degrees Celsius versus below it, in each of the six regions. The cut-off is used as an operational category without clinical connotation, and neither device is designated as the diagnostic reference.

  2. Consistency intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC(C,1), between the two cameras for mean plantar temperature (Tmean)

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    McGraw and Wong (1996) consistency formulation, equivalent to ICC(3,1) of Shrout and Fleiss (1979), reported with its 95 percent confidence interval. Exploratory endpoint with a hypothesis of ICC greater than or equal to 0.75. It is not powered by an independent sample size calculation.

  3. Bland-Altman systematic bias and 95 percent limits of agreement between the two cameras for mean plantar temperature (Tmean) and for contralateral thermal asymmetry (Delta T)

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    Systematic bias and 95 percent limits of agreement computed across the six pre-specified plantar regions of interest, for both the mean plantar temperature and the contralateral thermal asymmetry. Neither device is treated as a reference standard.

  4. Influence of participant clinical variables on the magnitude of inter-device discordance

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    The absolute inter-device difference is analyzed against the presence of peripheral sensory neuropathy, body mass index and type of diabetes mellitus.

  5. Image acquisition time

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    Time elapsed from the end of the acclimatization period to the correct export of both thermograms, measured with a stopwatch for each participant and reported in seconds.

  6. Proportion of technically valid thermograms

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    Percentage of thermographic acquisitions that did not require repetition because of a technical error, namely defocus, participant movement or a saving failure.

  7. Participant acceptability of the measurement protocol

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    Number of participants answering yes to a single dichotomous question asked verbally at the end of the session, on whether they would consider repeating this procedure at a future appointment.

  8. Descriptive distribution of the maximum contralateral thermal asymmetry per participant

    Time frame: Single measurement session (Day 1)

    Median and interquartile range reported separately for each camera. This measure is descriptive only. It is not the primary criterion and it is not indexed to either device.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Eduardo Luis Martín Javier

CONTACT

[email protected]

+34 647 773 675

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Eduardo Luis Martín Javier

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Inter-Device Concordance in the Measurement of Plantar Thermal Asymmetry: Comparative Evaluation of a Low-Cost Thermographic Camera (HIKMICRO Mini2 V2) Versus a High-Resolution Camera (HIKMICRO M60) in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Mar 11, 2026
Registry last updated
Aug 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.