University of Porto - Biomedical Sciences Institut
Porto, 4050-313, Portugal
NCT Number: NCT05131568
This study compares the effectiveness of a new layered thermal insulation system (SIT-3c) versus the traditional thermal body protection (warmed forced air system) for patients under total knee arthroplasty, during the intra-operative phase.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Porto, 4050-313, Portugal
Protecting patients from the cold in the operating room is a complex problem that has encouraged the search for better and more effective thermal protection systems. Some disadvantages have been observed in the daily use of the recommended thermal protection system (forced warm air).
This study intends to design and evaluate the effectiveness of a three-layer thermal insulation system, comparing its effect with the forced warm air system on temperature variation, shivering incidence and comfort perception, in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under neuro-axial anesthesia, during the intra-operative phase.
Participants are randomly assigned to the experimental group (EG) or control group (CG). The experimental group receives as a skin protection the three-layer thermal insulation system (SIT-3c) and the control group receives the usual recommended system (forced warm air).
Both systems are placed at the entrance to the operating room and held on patients during the entire intra-operative phase.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
No other intervention
Time frame: Baseline (entrance in the operating room)
Method of assessment - the TTS-400 thermometer, Smiths Medical was used
Time frame: immediately after anesthesia
Method of assessment - the TTS-400 thermometer, Smiths Medical was used
Time frame: 15 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the TTS-400 thermometer, Smiths Medical was used
Time frame: 30 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the TTS-400 thermometer, Smiths Medical was used
Time frame: 45 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the TTS-400 thermometer, Smiths Medical was used
Time frame: Up to 10 min after the end of surgery (living the operating room)
Method of assessment - the TTS-400 thermometer, Smiths Medical was used
Time frame: Baseline (entrance in the operating room)
Method of assessment - the Leslie and Sessler Scale, which measures tremors at three levels (0 - no tremors; 1 - slight tremors; 2 - vigorous tremors).
Time frame: immediately after anesthesia
Method of assessment - the Leslie and Sessler Scale, which measures tremors at three levels (0 - no tremors; 1 - slight tremors; 2 - vigorous tremors).
Time frame: 15 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Leslie and Sessler Scale, which measures tremors at three levels (0 - no tremors; 1 - slight tremors; 2 - vigorous tremors).
Time frame: 30 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Leslie and Sessler Scale, which measures tremors at three levels (0 - no tremors; 1 - slight tremors; 2 - vigorous tremors).
Time frame: 45 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Leslie and Sessler Scale, which measures tremors at three levels (0 - no tremors; 1 - slight tremors; 2 - vigorous tremors).
Time frame: Up to 10 min after the end of surgery (living the operating room)
Method of assessment - the Leslie and Sessler Scale, which measures tremors at three levels (0 - no tremors; 1 - slight tremors; 2 - vigorous tremors).
Time frame: Baseline (entrance in the operating room)
Method of assessment - the Visual Comfort Scale, which measures the perception of thermal comfort in two components: numerical (1 to 10) and visual (5 faces). The numerical component varies between 0 (very cold) and 10 (very hot), the value of the thermal neutrality, which means thermal comfort, identified in point 5; and the visual component where five expressive faces are presented. The first one, located between the numbers 0-2, shows strong cold discomfort, the second, located between 2-4, expressed cold discomfort, the third, located in the area of the number 5, expresses a sensation of thermal comfort, the fourth, located between the numbers 6-8, reveals heat discomfort and the fifth, located between 8-10, shows strong heat discomfort.
Time frame: immediately after anesthesia
Method of assessment - the Visual Comfort Scale, which measures the perception of thermal comfort in two components: numerical (1 to 10) and visual (5 faces). The numerical component varies between 0 (very cold) and 10 (very hot), the value of the thermal neutrality, which means thermal comfort, identified in point 5; and the visual component where five expressive faces are presented. The first one, located between the numbers 0-2, shows strong cold discomfort, the second, located between 2-4, expressed cold discomfort, the third, located in the area of the number 5, expresses a sensation of thermal comfort, the fourth, located between the numbers 6-8, reveals heat discomfort and the fifth, located between 8-10, shows strong heat discomfort.
Time frame: 15 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Visual Comfort Scale, which measures the perception of thermal comfort in two components: numerical (1 to 10) and visual (5 faces). The numerical component varies between 0 (very cold) and 10 (very hot), the value of the thermal neutrality, which means thermal comfort, identified in point 5; and the visual component where five expressive faces are presented. The first one, located between the numbers 0-2, shows strong cold discomfort, the second, located between 2-4, expressed cold discomfort, the third, located in the area of the number 5, expresses a sensation of thermal comfort, the fourth, located between the numbers 6-8, reveals heat discomfort and the fifth, located between 8-10, shows strong heat discomfort.
Time frame: 30 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Visual Comfort Scale, which measures the perception of thermal comfort in two components: numerical (1 to 10) and visual (5 faces). The numerical component varies between 0 (very cold) and 10 (very hot), the value of the thermal neutrality, which means thermal comfort, identified in point 5; and the visual component where five expressive faces are presented. The first one, located between the numbers 0-2, shows strong cold discomfort, the second, located between 2-4, expressed cold discomfort, the third, located in the area of the number 5, expresses a sensation of thermal comfort, the fourth, located between the numbers 6-8, reveals heat discomfort and the fifth, located between 8-10, shows strong heat discomfort.
Time frame: 45 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Visual Comfort Scale, which measures the perception of thermal comfort in two components: numerical (1 to 10) and visual (5 faces). The numerical component varies between 0 (very cold) and 10 (very hot), the value of the thermal neutrality, which means thermal comfort, identified in point 5; and the visual component where five expressive faces are presented. The first one, located between the numbers 0-2, shows strong cold discomfort, the second, located between 2-4, expressed cold discomfort, the third, located in the area of the number 5, expresses a sensation of thermal comfort, the fourth, located between the numbers 6-8, reveals heat discomfort and the fifth, located between 8-10, shows strong heat discomfort.
Time frame: Up to 10 min after the end of surgery (living the operating room)
Method of assessment - the Visual Comfort Scale, which measures the perception of thermal comfort in two components: numerical (1 to 10) and visual (5 faces). The numerical component varies between 0 (very cold) and 10 (very hot), the value of the thermal neutrality, which means thermal comfort, identified in point 5; and the visual component where five expressive faces are presented. The first one, located between the numbers 0-2, shows strong cold discomfort, the second, located between 2-4, expressed cold discomfort, the third, located in the area of the number 5, expresses a sensation of thermal comfort, the fourth, located between the numbers 6-8, reveals heat discomfort and the fifth, located between 8-10, shows strong heat discomfort.
Time frame: 30 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Perioperative Comfort Scale, based on Kolcaba´s theory, composed of 15 items answered by a six-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 6 (I totally agree), which measures general aspects of comfort in three dimensions: relief, ease and transcendence.
Time frame: 30 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Thermal Comfort Scale, composed of 9 items answered by a six-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 6 (I totally agree), which measures thermal aspects of comfort in two dimensions: physical and emotional.
Time frame: 30 minutes after beginning surgery
Method of assessment - the Ergonomic questionnaire, composed of 10 items answered by a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all comfortable) to 5 (very comfortable).
Universidade do Porto
Other
Efficacy of a Thermal Insulation System in Inadvertent Hypothermia and Perioperative Comfort
Acronym: SIT-3c
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03273894
Body Temperature Changes, Hypothermia
Brno, Jihomoravská Kraj, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT06428604
Perioperative Hypothermia
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT01858727
Body Temperature Changes, Hypothermia
Ankara, Altindag, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT01795482
Epidural Anaesthesia, General Anaesthesia
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
View Trial Details