Clinical Research Facility
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT04237454
When a child less than 2 years old attends the Emergency Department (ED) with an injury, carers should offer an explanation. When there is no explanation or if the explanation is inconsistent & because the child cannot say what happened, the doctor will need to consider all possible causes including child abuse. To help exclude abuse, the doctor will request x-rays of all the child's bones to make sure there are no other unexplained fractures. This requires up to 20 x-rays, which are called a skeletal survey. Even if there are no fractures, some or all of the x-rays will be repeated in the following 7-21 days, because by that time any fractures will have started to heal and so are easier to see than on the first skeletal survey. It means that if a doctor is worried about abuse, the child may need to have up to 40 x-rays, which amounts to a significant radiation dose (more than 6 months of natural UK background radiation) & increases the child's lifetime risk of getting cancer. 79 to 97 out of 100 skeletal surveys performed are normal. While it is of paramount importance to identify if a child is being abused, it is also important to minimise radiation dose. A camera which detects light and heat given off by the body has shown promise in some areas of medical practice. We plan to compare the results from the camera to those of the skeletal survey in 40 children below 2 years of age attending our hospital over a 6-month period. We hope to demonstrate that this technology can be used to further select children who should have a skeletal survey, reducing radiation dose in children without missing those who are being abused and sending them home to be abused again.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 month–16 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
To develop a non-ionising radiation-based method of excluding fractures in children with suspected physical abuse
Time frame: 6 months
Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) of thermal imaging compared to the full skeletal survey as gold standard
Time frame: 6 months
Radiation dose saving of a protocol that only images those areas of abnormality seen on thermal imaging compared to the full skeletal survey as gold standard
Time frame: 6 months
Descriptive statistics based on responses to a non-validated questionnaire on carer experiences of both imaging techniques
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Other
Thermal Imaging Compared to Skeletal Survey for Diagnosis of Fractures in Suspected Inflicted Injury in Children Below 2 Years of Age: A Prospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07256405
Bone, Fracture
Marseille, Bouches-du-Rhône, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04564625
Fracture, Fracture Nonunion
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01544725
Dislocation, Fracture
Nice, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06130397
Bone Fracture, Dislocation
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details