Therapeutic Plasma Exchange
ProcedureThe removed plasma is 'exchanged or replaced' with either IV fluids, albumin, and/or Fresh frozen plasma
NCT Number: NCT04057872
The incidence of sepsis (severe infection) has increased over the last four decades. Severe sepsis and septic shock are among the leading causes of death for patients admitted to critical care units with mortality ranging from 20-70% depending on totality of organ dysfunction. Outside of antibiotics and good bedside care, little has changed in the management of this life-threatening problem.
Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) involves the separation of plasma from whole blood. The removed plasma is 'exchanged or replaced' with either IV fluids, albumin, blood products or a combination thereof.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of the TPE intervention protocol within 24 hours of study criteria being met. TPE is now a well-established program at the South Health Campus for neuro-muscular disorders. Since starting in May 2018, the investigators have performed over 150 runs making the SHC ICU one of the most experienced centers in Canada.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Peter Lougheed Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Background
The incidence of sepsis has increased over the last four decades (1). Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to an infection injures its own tissues and organs. Severe sepsis and septic shock are among the leading causes of death for patients admitted to critical care units with mortality ranging from 20-70% depending on totality of organ dysfunction (2, 3). The literature is replete with initial promising phase 2 therapies failing in definitive randomized trails (4-8). In fact, a recent systematic review concluded that no evidence exists for any pharmacologic intervention that has consistently reduced mortality in critically ill patients (9). This is both surprising and frustrating for the author. The most recent guidelines have tried to redefine sepsis as a 'syndrome' since neither validated criterion nor do standard diagnostic tests exist (10). The authors argue that sepsis should be viewed as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated or non-homeostatic host response. Most of the clinical manifestations of severe infections are caused by an intense, generalized inflammatory response in the host mediated by a multitude of interrelated cellular and humoral factors (3).
Plasmapheresis or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) involves the separation of plasma from whole blood. The removed plasma is 'exchanged or replaced' with crystalloids, albumin, fresh frozen plasma or a combination thereof. TPE use is well established in many neurological disorders including Guillain-Barre syndrome (11), Myasthenia Gravis (12, 13) and antibody mediated syndromes(14, 15). It is considered the standard of care for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) (16, 17). The rationale for the use of TPE in sepsis, a non-selective intervention, is to remove multiple toxic mediators including endotoxins, activated complement, pro-inflammatory cytokines and pro-coagulant factors (18, 19). If fresh-frozen plasma is used as replacement fluid, consumed plasma factors are substituted, thereby possibly restoring the opsonic capacity and improving the coagulation abnormalities and microcirculation.
Plasma exchange has been reported since the late 1970s as a potential adjunctive or salvage therapy in severe sepsis in both pediatric and adult patients (20-24). These case reports, retrospective reviews and observational studies suggest a survival advantage when compared to historical controls. However, the obvious bias limits any meaningful interpretation. A literature review found only 4 studies with any attempt at randomization. One study enrolled only adults (25), two were exclusively pediatric patients (26, 27) and one study involved both adults and children (28). Excluding the pediatric studies, the adult protocols had few similarities:
A more recent German pilot study tried to evaluate the safety and feasibility of enrollment within 12 hours of shock for a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) (29). The inclusion criteria were simple: (a) Current sepsis-3 definitions; noradrenaline dose >0.4ug/kg/min despite >30mls/kg of crystalloid; (b) Less than 12 hours of vasopressor support. They performed a single 1.2x plasma exchange using entirely FFP. The major findings were significantly less vasopressor support, fluid balance and a decline in plasma concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators. The "sustained -responders" mortality was 43% vs 77% of non-responders, but the small numbers prevented statistical significance.
The use of plasma exchange in severe sepsis is graded by the American Society for Apheresis as category III with grade 2C indications, indicating that there is a lack of reliable trials to support TPE use in the condition (30). The purpose of this phase 1 clinical trial is to assess the safety of using plasma exchange in critically ill adult patients with septic shock. TPE is now a well-established program at the South Health Campus (SHC) for neuro-muscular disorders. Since starting in May 2018, we have performed over 240 runs in 43 patients making the SHC ICU the most experienced TPE center in Canada in the past 2 years. One plasma volume is currently the standard dose used safely in patients with neuro-muscular disorders at SHC.
Justification of Research
Study Objectives
Primary Objective: To evaluate the safety of the TPE intervention protocol within 24 hours of study criteria being met.
Secondary Objectives:
Hypothesis
It is hypothesized that TPE will be safe for use in patients with septic shock. We will determine the maximum tolerable dose via a dose escalation study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Adult patients (age ≥18) with a documented or strong clinical suspicion of infection that meets the definition of septic shock as per the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
Exhibiting two of the four clinical signs of inflammation:
We will further identify the subset with a hospital mortality in excess of 40%:
Exclusion criteria
Patients will be excluded in cases where death is deemed inevitable or imminent during admission and either the attending physician, patient or surrogate legal decision maker is not committed to active treatment.
The removed plasma is 'exchanged or replaced' with either IV fluids, albumin, and/or Fresh frozen plasma
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Proportion of patients who experience at least 1 Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Proportion of patients who discontinue TPE administration due to an AE
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Protocol completion (patients who complete study protocol)
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Resolution or worsening of organ dysfunction as per SOFA score
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Hours of vasopressor support
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Days on ventilator if applicable
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Days in ICU (censored to day ready for discharge)
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Mortality
Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months
Need for RRT
Alberta Health Services, Calgary
Other
PILOT STUDY in the Use of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Adult Patients With Severe Sepsis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07658014
Cardiovascular Diseases, Infections
Querétaro City, Querétaro, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT05900284
Acute Kidney Injury, Female Urogenital Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02361528
Infections, Inflammation
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05194189
Infections, Inflammation
Guanzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details